Availability and Use of Contraceptive Implants in Jamaica: Results of a Review of Medical Records and a Survey of Reproductive Healthcare Providers in Six Public Health Centres / Disponibilidad y uso de los implantes anticonceptivos en Jamaica: resultados de una revisión de las historias clínicas y una encuesta de los proveedores de salud reproductiva en seis centros de salud pública

ABSTRACT Objective: The prevalence of sub-dermal contraceptive implant use in Jamaica is low, despite growing international acceptance of long-acting reversible contraception. This study assessed the availability, effectiveness, side-effects and utilization of sub-dermal contraceptive implants and described the characteristics of users over a one-year period. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of women aged 15-45 years who utilized contraceptive implant-related services at any of the six included public health centres in Jamaica during 2013, and surveyed 20 available reproductive healthcare providers. Results: In 2013, 738 women attended a Jamaican public health centre for contraceptive implant services: 493 (66.8%) for insertion, 202 (27.4%) for removal and 53 (7.2%) for follow-up visits (10 women had the same implant inserted and removed in 2013). The women's median age was 26.0 years, 24.3% were ≤ 18 years, and 85.9% had ≥ 1 child. Most women (68.5%) did not have documented side-effects; irregular bleeding, the most commonly documented side-effect, was recorded for 24%. Of the 493 women who had implants inserted, three (0.6%) were identified to be pregnant within three months of insertion. Among the 202 women who had implants removed, 11 (5.4%) experienced complications with removal. Reproductive healthcare providers highlighted the need for an expansion of contraceptive implant availability and provider training. Conclusion: Sub-dermal implants have few insertion complications and side-effects and are effective, but were underutilized in Jamaica. Increased implant availability and enhanced reproductive healthcare provider training may improve implant utilization and reduce unintended pregnancy rates in Jamaica.

RESUMEN Objetivo: La prevalencia del uso de implantes anticonceptivos subdérmicos en Jamaica es baja, a pesar de la creciente aceptación internacional de la anticoncepción reversible de acción prolongada. El presente estudio evalúa la disponibilidad, efectividad, efectos secundarios y utilización de los implantes anticonceptivos subdérmicos, y describe las características de los usuarios durante el período de un año. Métodos: Se revisaron las historias clínicas de mujeres de 15 a 45 años de edad, que utilizaron servicios relacionados con los implantes anticonceptivos en cualquiera de los seis centros de salud pública de Jamaica durante 2013, y se encuestaron 20 profesionales de salud reproductiva disponibles. Resultados: En 2013, 738 mujeres asistieron a un centro de salud pública de Jamaica para recibir servicios de implantes anticonceptivos: 493 (66.8%) para inserción, 202 (27.4%) para eliminación, y 53 (7.2%) para visitas de seguimiento (a 10 mujeres se les insertó y se les quitó el mismo implante en 2013). La edad promedio de las mujeres fue 26.0 años, 24.3% tenían ≤ 18 años, y el 85.9% tenían ≥ 1 niño. La mayoría de las mujeres (68.5%) no presentaban efectos secundarios documentados. El sangramiento irregular - el efecto secundario más comúnmente documentado - se registró en un 24%. De las 493 mujeres que tenían implantes insertados, se halló que tres (0.6%) resultaron embarazadas en el plazo de tres meses tras la inserción. De las 202 mujeres a las que se les había retirado el implante, 11 (5.4%) tuvieron complicaciones en el proceso de la eliminación. Los profesionales de la salud reproductiva destacaron la necesidad de expandir la disponibilidad de implantes anticonceptivos y la capacitación de proveedores. Conclusión: Los implantes subdérmicos presentan pocas complicaciones a la hora de su inserción, y tienen pocos efectos secundarios. Sin embargo, son subutilizados en Jamaica, a pesar de ser efectivos. Una mayor disponibilidad de implantes y una mejor capacitación de los profesionales de la salud reproductiva pueden mejorar la utilización de implantes y reducir las tasas de embarazos no intencionados en Jamaica.

Comparison of methods to assess coronary heart disease prevalence in South Asians.

BACKGROUND: Migrants from the Indian subcontinent (South Asian migrants) in the United Kingdom have high mortality from coronary heart disease (CHD) in comparison to the indigenous population. Few studies have assessed the prevalence of CHD in South Asians, and the applicability of conventional survey methods in this population is not known. In this pilot random population survey of South Asian men and women living in West London, the prevalence of CHD as judged by the Rose questionnaire, past cardiac history, cardiologist and resting electrocardiogram were compared. METHODS: Subjects aged 30-64 years from randomly selected households were invited for a cardiological assessment. A lay person administered the Rose questionnaire and recorded the past cardiac history. A cardiologist also made an independent assessment and a 12-lead electrocardiogram was recorded and analysed according to the Minnesota code. RESULTS: Three hundred and seventy-six individuals (192 men and 184 women) were assessed. The prevalence of angina in men and women, respectively, was 3.1% and 4.9% by the Rose questionnaire; 2.6% and 2.2% by past cardiac history; and 4.2% and 0.5% according to the cardiologist. The prevalence of myocardial infarction in men and women, respectively, was 5.2% and 2.2% by the Rose questionnaire, 3.6% and zero by past cardiac history and 3.6% and 0.5% by the cardiologist. Q/QS codes were present in 1.6% men and 0.5% women and ischaemic codes in 13% men and 14% women. Ischaemic changes were not associated with any cardiac history in 72% of men and 92% of women. For a diagnosis of CHD in men, there was poor agreement between the Rose questionnaire and either the past cardiac history or the cardiologist's assessment, but moderate agreement between the past cardiac history and the cardiologist. Agreement was poor between all three methods for a positive diagnosis of CHD in women. CONCLUSION: Current accepted epidemiological methods for assessing CHD prevalence may be inaccurate in South Asians, especially women. Electrocardiogram abnormalities suggestive of ischaemia are common in South Asians and are usually not associated with evidence of CHD. Thus, their value as indicators of CHD is questionable.