Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 14 de 14
Filtre
Ajouter des filtres








Gamme d'année
1.
SJA-Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia. 2012; 6 (2): 186
Dans Anglais | IMEMR | ID: emr-131534
2.
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology [The]. 2011; 17 (3): 222
Dans Anglais | IMEMR | ID: emr-131627
3.
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology [The]. 2011; 17 (3): 222-223
Dans Anglais | IMEMR | ID: emr-131628
4.
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology [The]. 2011; 17 (4): 298
Dans Anglais | IMEMR | ID: emr-124764
5.
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology [The]. 2011; 17 (1): 80-81
Dans Anglais | IMEMR | ID: emr-112935

Résumé

A 56-year-old female came to emergency department with complaints of severe abdominal pain in the epigastric region with abdominal distention. She had also complained of fever. No significant past medical or surgical history was available. Her pulse rate and respiratory rate were 110/min and 26/min, respectively. On examination of abdomen, belly was distended with guarding and rigidity and periumbilical ecchymosis. She was post-menopausal. Per-vaginal and per-rectal examination were normal


Sujets)
Humains , Femelle , Douleur abdominale/étiologie , Urgences , Obésité , Post-ménopause/physiologie
6.
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology [The]. 2011; 17 (1): 82-83
Dans Anglais | IMEMR | ID: emr-112936

Résumé

A 50-year-old lady presented to the emergency room with severe left-sided chest pain following an episode of forceful vomiting. A history of giddiness was present. Her past medical and surgical history were insignificant. On examination, she was having a respiratory rate of 24/ min and her blood pressure was 100/60 mmHg. She was diaphoretic and surgical emphysema was present. On plain radiography, hydropneumothorax was present. Gastrograffin study of the patient was performed


Sujets)
Humains , Femelle , Douleur thoracique/étiologie , Amidotrizoate de méglumine/effets indésirables
9.
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology [The]. 2010; 16 (3): 228
Dans Anglais | IMEMR | ID: emr-123585
10.
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology [The]. 2010; 16 (3): 241-242
Dans Anglais | IMEMR | ID: emr-123590
11.
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology [The]. 2010; 16 (4): 268-271
Dans Anglais | IMEMR | ID: emr-139391

Résumé

To establish the efficacy of two-port appendectomy as an alternative to standard laparoscopic and open appendectomy in the management of acute appendicitis. Of the 151 patients included in the study, 47 patients were in the open group, 61 in two-port and 43 patients were included in the three-port group. Only patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis were included in the study. Patients with complicated appendicitis like perforated appendix, appendicular lump and appendicular abscess were excluded from the study. Patients converted to open procedure after initial diagnosis and patients with other pathology in addition to appendicitis were also excluded. Patients with recurrent appendicitis and chronic appendicitis were excluded. The total number of excluded cases was 50. Data were compared with cases of open and three-port appendectomy. The mean operative time was 43.94, 35.74, and 59.65 min [SD: 18.91, 11.06, 19.29] for open, two-port, and three-port appendectomy groups respectively. Mean length of stay in days was 3.02, 1.93, and 2.26 [SD: 1.27, 1.04, 1.09] for open, two-port, and three-port appendectomy groups respectively. Surgical site infection was significantly lower [P = 0.03] in laparoscopy group as compared to that in open appendectomy group. Seven patients [4.63%] developed surgical site infection, 5 [10.63%] in the open and 2 [1.92%] in the laparoscopy group. Surgical site infection was 1.63% and 2.32% in two-port and three-port appendectomy groups respectively. For uncomplicated appendicitis, the two-port appendectomy technique significantly reduces operative time as well as length of hospital stay. It also reduces surgical site infection as compared to open appendectomy group

12.
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology [The]. 2010; 16 (4): 306
Dans Anglais | IMEMR | ID: emr-139403
13.
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology [The]. 2010; 16 (4): 306-307
Dans Anglais | IMEMR | ID: emr-139404
14.
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology [The]. 2010; 16 (4): 319-320
Dans Anglais | IMEMR | ID: emr-139410
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
Détails de la recherche