Long-term outcomes of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stent implantation in patients with chronic total coronary artery occlusions / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>There are limited data on the efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) for treatment of chronic total occlusions (CTO). The aim of the study was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of DES implantation for CTO compared with bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Between June 1995 and December 2006, a total of 1184 patients with successful recanalization of at least one de novo CTO lesion were consecutively registered, including 660 (55.7%) who underwent DES and 524 (44.3%) who underwent BMS implantation. All patients were followed up for up to 5 years for occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Long-term survival rates were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were comparable between the two groups except that patients in the DES group received longer dual antiplatelet therapy ((7.4 +/- 2.5) months vs (1.7 +/- 0.8) months, P < 0.001). Average follow-up periods were (4.7 +/- 0.89) and (3.2 +/- 1.3) years for the BMS and DES groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in 5-year survival rates between the two groups (90.3% for DES group vs 89.6% for BMS group, Log-rank P = 0.38), but the 5-year target vessel revascularization (TVR)-free survival rate in the DES group was significantly higher than that in the BMS group (81.6% vs 73.5%, Log-rank P < 0.001). The cumulative MACE-free survival in the DES group was also significantly higher than that in the BMS group (80.6% vs 71.5%, Log-rank P < 0.001). The rates of re-admission caused by cardiovascular disease (27.0% vs 37.8%, P < 0.001) and the need for bypass surgery were significantly lower in the DES group (1.5% vs 3.4%, P < 0.05). By multivariable analysis, DES implantation could significantly lower the long-term MACE risk of PCI for CTO patients (HR: 0.492; 95% CI 0.396 - 0.656, P < 0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% and elderly (> or = 65 years) were identified as independent predictors of long-term MACE during follow-up.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>This study demonstrates the long-term (up to 5 years) efficacy of DES for treatment of CTO, which is superior to BMS implantation in reducing the rates of TVR and MACE, as well as the need of re-admission and bypass surgery.</p>

Long-term clinical outcomes of patients undergoing successful or failed percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions of coronary arteries / 中华心血管病杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the long-term outcomes of successful or failed revascularization in patients with chronic total occlusions (CTO).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The clinical data of 1332 consecutive patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for CTO between June 1993 and December 2006 in our hospital were analyzed. These patients were divided into two groups according to the procedural success (n = 1202) or failure (n = 130).</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Overall success rate of procedure was 90.2% (1202/1332). The patients in CTO success group experienced a superior 10-year survival rate (76.9% vs. 64.6%, log rank P = 0.012) and a significantly higher no major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) survival rate (41.8% vs. 27.6%, log rank P < 0.001) compared to the patients in CTO failure group. During the long-term follow-up, the proportion of patients who accepted coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was significantly lower in CTO success group than that in the CTO failure group (4.3% vs. 14.6%, P < 0.001).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Successful PCI procedure leads to increased long-term survival and MACE-free survival and the reduced need for CABG for patients with CTO lesions.</p>