Résumé
Objective To explore the advantages of automatic chromosome harvester in lymphocyte micronucleus test. Methods The peripheral blood of 80 radiation workers was collected, then lymphocytes were harvested with an automatic chromosome harvester and manual methods. After Giemsa stained the slides, the micronucleus of the lymphocytes was analyzed under a microscope. Results For lymphocytes from the same batch of specimens, the time of the automatic harvester (185 min) was less than that of the artificial group (350 min). The micronucleus rate (1.04‰ ± 0.63‰), micronucleus cell rate (0.89‰ ± 0.69) and micronucleus positive rate (70.0%) that obtained by the harvester were all higher than manual method (0.60‰ ± 0.68‰, 0.51‰ ± 0.55‰, 48.8%), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01). Conclusion The automatic chromosome harvester can shorten the experimental operation time, reduce the workload of laboratory personnel, and protect the physical and mental health of laboratory personnel. At the same time, it can increase the detection rate of lymphocyte micronucleus, which can provide more accurate detection data for the clinic.
Résumé
Objective@#To investigate the effects of long-term exposure to silica dust on serum CC16 and KL-6 levels.@*Methods@#The patients with stage I silicosis who were hospitalized in our hospital from April 2016 to April 2017 were treated as silicosis group. The silica dust exposed workers without silicosis who were taken the physical examination in our hospital were taken as a dust-exposed group. The healthy control group comes from in the same period of community physical examination did not touch the dust. The levels of CC16 and KL-6 in serum of all subjects were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) , and the levels of CC16 and KL-6 in serum were compared in three groups.@*Results@#Compared with the control group, the serum levels of CC16 in the silicosis group (P<0.01) and the dust-exposed group (P<0.01) were significantly lower. Compared with the control group, the level of serum KL-6 in the silicosis group was significantly decreased (P<0.01) compared with the control group, while the level of KL-6 in the serum of the dust-exposed group was significantly increased (P<0.01) . The ROC area of CC16 for diagnosis of silicosis was 0.92 (P<0.01) , with a sensitivity of 81.37%, specificity of 92.63% and Kappa value of 0.74.@*Conclusion@#Long-term exposure to silica dust may lead to a decrease in serum CC16 levels. Reduced serum CC16 levels may be useful in identifying the diagnosis of silicosis.