Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtre
Ajouter des filtres








Gamme d'année
1.
Journal of Leukemia & Lymphoma ; (12): 516-522, 2019.
Article Dans Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-798241

Résumé

Objective@#To explore the impact on efficacy and prognosis of low-risk and intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML, non-M3) patients with complete remission (CR) treated by high-dose cytarabine (HD-Ara-C) or standard-dose cytarabine(SD-Ara-C) before haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Haplo-HSCT).@*Methods@#A retrospective analysis was performed on 71 low-risk and intermediate-risk adult AML patients in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from March 2008 to April 2017. All the patients were treated by consolidation regimens containing cytarabine before Haplo-HSCT. According to the dosages of cytarabine, the patients were divided into HD-Ara-C group and SD-Ara-C group. Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox regression model were used to make survival analysis, and the prognosis and efficacy between the two groups were compared.@*Results@#Of the 71 patients, 43 were male and 28 were female, and the median age was 37 years (18-56 years). The median follow-up time was 39 months (6-119 months). Sixty-four patients were in first remission, and 7 patients were in second remission. At the end of follow-up, the 2-year cumulative incidence of recurrence (CIR), overall survival (OS) rate, progression-free survival (PFS) rate, and non-recurrent death (NRM) rate in SD-Ara-C group were 19.33%, 77.44%, 80.67%, and 17.29%, respectively, the 2-year CIR, OS rate, PFS rates and NRM rate in HD-Ara-C group were 6.29%, 79.90%, 93.71%, and 17.68%, respectively. There was no significant difference in CIR (P = 0.124), OS rate (P = 0.862), PFS rate (P = 0.124) and NRM rate (P = 0.734) between the two groups. The incidence of severe infection in HD-Ara-C group was higher than that in SD-Ara-C group after consolidation therapy [62.8% (22/35) vs. 27.8% (10/36), P = 0.03].@*Conclusion@#Compared with SD-Ara-C, the consolidation therapy containing HD-Ara-C before Haplo-HSCT cannot significantly improve the prognosis of low-risk and intermediate-risk AML patients in CR, but would increase the risk of severe infection after intensive consolidation therapy.

2.
Journal of Leukemia & Lymphoma ; (12): 516-522, 2019.
Article Dans Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-751435

Résumé

Objective To explore the impact on efficacy and prognosis of low-risk and intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML, non-M3) patients with complete remission (CR) treated by high-dose cytarabine (HD-Ara-C) or standard-dose cytarabine(SD-Ara-C) before haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Haplo-HSCT). Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 71 low-risk and intermediate-risk adult AML patients in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from March 2008 to April 2017. All the patients were treated by consolidation regimens containing cytarabine before Haplo-HSCT. According to the dosages of cytarabine, the patients were divided into HD-Ara-C group and SD-Ara-C group. Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox regression model were used to make survival analysis, and the prognosis and efficacy between the two groups were compared. Results Of the 71 patients, 43 were male and 28 were female, and the median age was 37 years (18-56 years). The median follow-up time was 39 months (6-119 months). Sixty-four patients were in first remission, and 7 patients were in second remission. At the end of follow-up, the 2-year cumulative incidence of recurrence (CIR), overall survival (OS) rate, progression-free survival (PFS) rate, and non-recurrent death (NRM) rate in SD-Ara-C group were 19.33%, 77.44%, 80.67%, and 17.29%, respectively, the 2-year CIR, OS rate, PFS rates and NRM rate in HD-Ara-C group were 6.29%, 79.90%, 93.71%, and 17.68%, respectively. There was no significant difference in CIR (P=0.124), OS rate (P=0.862), PFS rate (P=0.124) and NRM rate (P=0.734) between the two groups. The incidence of severe infection in HD-Ara-C group was higher than that in SD-Ara-C group after consolidation therapy [62.8% (22/35) vs. 27.8% (10/36), P= 0.03]. Conclusion Compared with SD-Ara-C, the consolidation therapy containing HD-Ara-C before Haplo-HSCT cannot significantly improve the prognosis of low-risk and intermediate-risk AML patients in CR, but would increase the risk of severe infection after intensive consolidation therapy.

SÉLECTION CITATIONS
Détails de la recherche