Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtre
Ajouter des filtres








Gamme d'année
1.
International Journal of Surgery ; (12): 731-734, 2008.
Article Dans Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-397653

Résumé

Objective To investigate prospectively effects of different drainage methods on preventing anastomotie leakage after Dixon operation in rectal carcinomas.Methods During the period of January 2002 to January 2007,450 patients with rectal carcinomas received Dixon operation.They were divided into three groups ( group A,B,and C) in order of admission.Presacral drainage was done in Group A,presaeral drainage + drainage through anus with one tubes in Group B,and presacral drainage + drainage through anus with two tubes in Group C.The postoperative complications of three groups were observed.Results There was 7.33% (11/150) ,8.00% (12/150) and 6.67% (10/150) wound infection in group A,B and C respectively.8.67% (13/150),6.67% (10/150) and 1.33% (2/150) anastomotic leakage occurred in group A,B and C respectively.Three groups had a similar wound infection ineidence(P >0.05).The occurrence of anastomotic leakage in group C was statistically lower than that in group A and B ( P < 0.05 ).Conclusion Presacral drainage + drainage through anus with two tubes can effectively prevent anastomotic leakage after Dixon operation in rectal carcinomas.

2.
Chinese Journal of Bases and Clinics in General Surgery ; (12)2008.
Article Dans Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-548019

Résumé

0.05).Conclusions There are no significant preoperative gut mucosal barrier function damages in patients with 1 d and 3 d bowel preparation for colorectal carcinoma surgery,1 d bowel preparation for colorectal carcinoma surgery can be performed in colorectal carcinoma patients,and 3 d bowel preparation can be used for certain special colorectal carcinoma patients.

SÉLECTION CITATIONS
Détails de la recherche