Two-year Clinical Outcomes Following Everolimus-eluting Stent Use for Off-label Versus On-label Indications: From the Korean Multicenter Drug-eluting Stent Registry / 계명의대학술지

BACKGROUND: Everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implantations have a relatively low rate of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) and target lesion revascularization (TLR) in patients with off-label use. However, the clinical outcome in the Korean population regarding EES in patients with off-label use is not well known. OBJECTS: The aim of the current analysis was to compare the clinical outcomes of on-label and off-label EES use over a 2-year follow-up period. METHODS: Using patient-level data from a stent-specific, prospective, all-comer registry, we evaluated 987 patients (1,342 lesions) who received an EES (XIENCE V®, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) implantation between February 2009 and April 2011. The primary outcome was assessed: 2-year MACE (a composite endpoint of death from any cause, spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI), and any repeat revascularization). The clinical outcomes in the on- and off-label groups were compared at 2 years. RESULTS: The majority of patients (79.0%) were treated for ≥1 off-label indication. The median duration of the clinical follow-up in the overall population was 2.0 years (interquartile range 1.9–2.1). At 2-years after the EES implantation in the enrolled patients, MACE occurred in 71 (7.9%) patients, cardiac death in 12 (1.3%), MI in 4 (0.5%), target vessel revascularization (TVR) in 33 (3.8%), TLR in 22 (2.5%), and definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST) in 1 (0.1%). Off-label EES implantations tend to increase the risk of 2-year MACE (4.7% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.063) without statistical significance. However, the rates of TLR were higher in the off-label EES implantations (0.0% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.013). In the multivariable analysis, renal failure, previous bypass surgery, previous cerebrovascular accident, and left main lesions were associated with 2-year MACE in patients with EES implantations. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of 2-year MACE was 7.9%, which that might be acceptable in all-comer patients treated with EES implantations. Although the off-label use of EES was not statistically associated with an increased risk of MACE, the TLR rate was higher in the off-label group, suggesting that physicians need to pay attention to high risk patients with the use of EES implantations.

The Ratio Between the Percentage of Lymphocytes and Glucose Levels in Pericardial Fluid as a Method to Diagnose Tuberculous Pericarditis / 대한내과학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Adenosine deaminase (ADA) is a valuable biochemical marker for pericardial effusion (PE) and may be useful for diagnosing tuberculous pericarditis (TPE) in patients with PE. However, no definite cut-off or borderline values for ADA currently exist to distinguish TPE from other PE etiologies. In this study, we identified other useful parameters and characterized their relationship with ADA as a method for diagnosing TPE. METHODS: From June 2004 to November 2011, 42 patients underwent pericardiocentesis due to moderate or severe PE, as confirmed by echocardiography or chest computed tomography (CT). Patients were subdivided into TPE and non-TPE (NTPE) groups. We analyzed ADA (p) (the pericardial ADA) and %Lymph (p)/Glucose (p) (the ratio between the percentage of lymphocytes and glucose levels in PE). RESULTS: We defined the cut-off value of ADA (p) as 48.5 IU/L, and that of %Lymph (p)/Glucose (p) as 0.678%.dL/mg. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, an odds ratio (OR) of 44.24 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 2.85-686.97 were observed in patients with an ADA (p) > or = 48.5 IU/L (p = 0.023). An OR of 20.39 and a 95% CI of 1.06-392.93 were observed in patients with a %Lymph (p)/Glucose (p) > or = 0.678%.dL/mg (p = 0.046). The combination of ADA (p) and %Lymph (p)/Glucose (p) had a higher positive predictive value (PPV, 80.0%) and specificity (Sp, 93.8%) than either ADA (p) (PPV, 47.4%; Sp, 68.8%) or %Lymph (p)/Glucose (p) (PPV, 69.2%; Sp, 87.5%) alone. CONCLUSIONS: %Lymph (p)/Glucose (p) is a useful parameter for distinguishing TPE from other pericardial diseases if combined with an ADA (p) > or = 48.5 IU/L.

Intracardiac Tumor Presenting as Complete Atrioventricular Block

No abstract available.

Anomalous Origin of the Left Coronary Artery from the Right Sinus of Valsalva, which Presented as Acute Myocardial Infarction

Among all the congenital coronary anomalies, an anomalous origin of the left coronary artery (LCA) from the right sinus of Valsalva is rare. A 48-year-old male patient suffering with lateral acute myocardial infarction was referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The initial angiogram failed to show the LCA, which originated from the right coronary sinus. A critical stenotic lesion was observed in the distal left circumflex artery. The lesion was treated successfully with stenting. We report here on a case of an anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the right sinus of Valsalva, and the patient presented as acute myocardial infarction. He was successfully treated with primary percutaneous intervention.

Sirolimus-Eluting Stent for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis: Comparision with Cutting Balloon Angioplasty

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The use of drug-eluting stent implantation for in-stent restenosis (ISR) has shown some promising results. This study investigated the clinical and angiographic results of performing sirolimuseluting stent (SES) implantation for the treatment of patients with ISR as compared with treatment with cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty one patients with ISR (43 lesions) were treated with SES implantation and they were retrospectively compared with a group of patient with matched lesions that were treated with CBA (57 patients with 61 lesions). Routine angiographic follow-up was obtained at about 6 months after treatment and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events was evaluated. RESULTS: The baseline clinical characteristics, the patterns of ISR and the minimal luminal diameters (MLD) were not different between the two groups. There was no procedural failure and no immediate major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE) in the two groups. There were two target lesion revascularizations during the clinical follow-up in the CBA group and no MACE was found in the SES group (4% vs. 0%, respectively p<0.001). On the follow-up angiogram, the MLD and the stenosis diameter were significantly lower in the SES group than in the CBA group (2.82+/-0.33 vs. 1.80+/-0.82 mm, p<0.001; and 11.3+/-9.6 vs. 41.2+/-24.8%, p<0.001, respectively). The acute gain was significantly higher and the late loss was significantly lower in the SES group than in the CBA group (2.64+/-0.38 vs. 2.02+/-0.44 mm, p<0.001; and 0.21+/-0.28 vs. 0.71+/-0.73, p<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The sirolimuseluting stent was safe, feasible and highly effective for treating the patients suffering with in-stent restenosis as compared with cutting balloon angioplasty.

Association between Aortic Valve Sclerosis and Risk Factors of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Aortic valve sclerosis (AVS) is often considered to be benign and it is also considered to be a manifestation of generalized atherosclerosis that involves the aortic valve. However, it is associated with high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in a population-based study. This study was performed to evaluate the significance of AVS in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients with AVS (AVS group, n=111) and patients with normal aortic valves (control group, n=99) who underwent coronary angiography (CAG) between May, 2004 and June, 2004 were enrolled in this study. We compared the CAG findings and the CAD risk factors in both groups, and we evaluated the diagnostic value of AVS for predicting CAD. We also performed multivariate logistic regression analysis for the risk factors, including AVS, of CAD. RESULTS: This study showed that AVS is an independent echocardiographic predictor of significant CAD in the patients with suspected CAD (OR=2.55, 95% CI: 1.25 to 5.17, p<0.001). The other independent predictors include the male gender and hypertension. AVS has a relatively high positive predictive value (75.7%) and predictive accuracy (65.2%) for the patients with suspected CAD. CONCLUSION: The recognition of AVS on transthoracic echocardiography should alert the physicians to the possibility of significant underlying CAD and further evaluation is indicated, even though angiographic documentation might not be available.

A Case of Acute Myocardial Infarction and Multiorgan Involvement Secondary to Rheumatoid Vasculitis

Rheumatoid arthritis patients have an increased risk of subclinical cardiovascular disease, and they also have a high prevalence of carotid disease and peripheral arterial disease as a form of vasculitis. Rheumatoid arthritis patients have an increased cardiovascular mortality rate and an increased premature death rate, and they have a higher incidence of atherosclerosis. Myocardial infarction due to vasculitis is a rare complication for patients with rheumatoid vasculitis. We report here on a case of a patient with multiorgan involvement who developed myocardial infarction, right carotid artery occlusion and left renal artery occlusion secondary to his rheumatoid vasculitis.