Résumé
Objective@#To explore the clinical effect of double-wing flap for the treatment of toe syndactyly.@*Methods@#Retrospective analysis of 47 patients (60 syndactyly toes) who underwent double-wing flap to reconstruct toe web space in orthopedics department of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from February 2010 to October 2017.There were 21 males and 26 females, with an average age of 18.9 months (range: 10-48 months). All patients were treated with zigzag incisions to separate the toe syndactylys without skin grafts.The condition of wound healing and appearance of toes were observed.@*Results@#The average follow-up time was 62.3 months (range: 6 to 80 months). There were no complications such as hematoma, infection, flap necrosis and no flexion contracture and obvious scar hyperplasia in all the 47 cases, 4 of the 60 webs developed web creep.All webs had good appearance with 45 degrees inclination from the dorsal to the metatarsal side and had good flexion and abduction function.@*Conclusions@#The double-wing flap is a simple and safe operation for toe syndactyly which has a good clinical effect.
Résumé
Objective@#To introduce a new surgical technique for the correction of congenital syndactyly without skin grafts.@*Methods@#The technique consists of a dorsal double-wing flap created from the dorsal skin of the metacarpophalangeal joint to cover the newly released web space and zigzag incisions in the fingers, thus avoiding the use of skin grafts in this area.@*Results@#From May 2010 to October 2016, 35 web spaces in 24 patients were treated using this technique. There were no complications such as haematoma, infection or flap necrosis. The average follow-up time was 54 months (range, 6 months to 60 months). One of the 35 webs developed web creep. No patients developed flexion contractures. All webs had good appearance with 45 degrees inclination from dorsal to palmar. All fingers had no obvious scar, and the flexion and abduction function were good.@*Conclusions@#The technique is simple, rapid, safe and easily performed and does not require the use of skin grafts.
Résumé
BACKGROUND:Flexible intramedulary nailing and external fixation for pediatric femoral shaft fractures are two common methods in the clinic. It remains controversial which fixation methods are better. OBJECTIVE:To systematicaly evaluate the therapeutic effects of flexible intramedulary nailing and external fixation for pediatric femoral shaft fractures. METHODS: A computer-based search was performed on PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane library for literatures on clinical controled trials of flexible intramedulary nailing and external fixation for pediatric femoral shaft fractures published before November 25, 2014. Literature language was not limited. The age of subjects was from 3 to 15 years. Modified Jadad was utilized to assess methodological quality of the included studies. Meta-analysis was carried out using Stata 12.0 software. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Six papers involving 237 patients were included. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with external fixation, a low incidence of overal complications [relative risk (RR)=0.30, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.19-0.46;P < 0.001] and pin-hole infection (RR=0.286, 95%CI: 0.13-0.61;P= 0.001), but a high risk of needle tail irritation (RR=1.86, 95%CI: 1.35-2.56;P < 0.001) were found folowing flexible intramedulary nailing. No significant differences in other complications were found between the two groups. These results confirm that compared with external fixation, elastic intramedulary nail has fewer complications and faster fracture healing. Elastic intramedulary nail is recommended for single pediatric femoral shaft fractures. However, external fixation is a better option for high energy injury of lower limbs, multiple trauma or severely soft tissue injury.