Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrer
Plus de filtres








Gamme d'année
1.
Article de Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-1026711

RÉSUMÉ

Objective:To investigate the ability of separate and combined biopsy methods to distinguish clinically significant prostate cancer(csPCa)from clinically insignificant prostate cancer(incsPCa),we assessed diagnostic positive rates for patients undergoing transperineal pro-state systematic biopsy(SB),cognitive fusion targeted biopsy(CF-TB),and combined biopsy(CB)(i.e.SB combined with CF-TB)under intra-venous anesthesia.Methods:We analyzed clinical data from 151 patients with prostate-specific antigen(PSA)≤50 ng/mL undergoing their first prostate biopsy in Cancer Hospital of Huanxing Chaoyang District Beijing and National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College from January 2019 to November 2021.The 3.0 Tesla standard prostate multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging(mpMRI)examinations found 161 lesions with prostate ima-ging reporting and data system(PI-RADS)scores≥3.With patients under intravenous anesthesia and indwelling catheter,2-4 needle CF-TB biopsies were performed using transperineal ultrasound guidance,followed by 12 needle SB.Patients who underwent SB,CF-TB,and CB were each analyzed by stratification for their respective csPCa and incsPCa detection rates,age,PSA,CF-TB needle count,PI-RADS score,and digital rectal examination results.Results:The median PSA value for all patients was 11.50(0.52-49.37 ng/mL).In total,161 lesions with PI-RADS score≥3 points were found.All 151 patients received 12 needles of SB,while 47,52,and 52 patients received 2,3,and 4 needles of CF-TB,respectively.The respective positivity rates of SB,CF-TB and CB in diagnosing csPCa were 54.3%(82/151),53.0%(80/151)and 58.9%(89/151).Statistical results indicate that the difference in positivity rate between CB and SB is significant(P=0.016)as is the difference between CB and CF-TB positivity rates(P=0.004).The respective positivity rates of SB,CF-TB,and CB in diagnosing incsPCa were 7.9%(12/151)、9.3%(14/151),and 11.3%(17/151).The positivity rate of CB was not significantly different than that of SB or CF-TB(all P>0.05).Stratification plane analysis with age,PSA value,number of CF-TB needles,PI-RADS score,and digital rectal examination results showed that the 2-needle CF-TB scheme was inferior to CB in diagnosing csPCa(P=0.031).There was no significant difference in the csPCa positivity rates of 3-needle and 4-needle CF-TB relative to CB.Conclusions:CB achieves a higher csPCa diagnosis rate without increasing de-tection of incsPCa under transperineal ultrasound guidance.CF-TB with 3-needles per lesion was highly effective in diagnosing csPCa.

2.
Chinese Journal of Urology ; (12): 31-36, 2019.
Article de Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-734567

RÉSUMÉ

Objective To investigate the dose of docetaxel appropriate for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and its affects to the prognosis.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 75 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer admitted from March 2010 to July 2016 who received docetaxel combined with prednisone chemotherapy.The patients were divided into the low-dose group (n =43,docetaxel < 65 mg/m2),the middle-dose group (n =21,docetaxel 65-70 mg/m2) and the high-dose group (n =11,docetaxel > 70 mg/m2).The median age in the low-dose group,middle-dose group and high-dose group was 67 (53-80),66 (56-78) and 61 (47-76) years old,respectively.Among 75 patients with bone metastasis,2 patients had no evidence of bone metastasis in the low-dose group.The lymph node metastasis was found in 26,13 and 6 cases in each group,respectively.And visceral and other metastasis were founded in 11,4 and 2 cases,respectively.The Gleason score in the low-dose group was≤7 points in 15 cases,≥8 points in 22 cases and no score in 6 cases.The Gleason score inthe middle-dose group was ≤7 points in 4 cases,≥8 points in 13 cases and no score in 4 cases.The Gleason score in the high-dose group was ≤7 points in 3 cases,≥8 points in 5 cases and no score in 3 cases.The number of patients with pain in the low-dose group,middle-dose group and high-dose group was 36,12 and 9,respectively,there were no significant differences in the above indicators (P > 0.05),except age,which showed relatively more aged patients in the low-dose group,(P =0.045).Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the overall survival (OS),progression-free survival (PFS) and the incidence of ≥CTCAE-4 grade 3 adverse reactions between the two groups.The Cox regression model was adopted to analyzed the factors that might affect patient prognosis,including the effective time of first-line endocrine therapy,hemoglobin level,ECOG score,pain score,number of cycles of chemotherapy,age,dose of docetaxel and alkaline phosphatase (ALP).Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the effect of dose of docetaxel on the prognosis,and log-rank method was used to test the significance of the results.Results The median OS was respectively 24.1,18.5 and 23.5 months in the low-dose group,middle-dose group and high-dose group,respectively.The median PFS was 5.3 months in all three groups,which didn't show statistically significant differences.The incidence of grade 3/4 adverse reactions in the low-dose group,middle-dose group and high-dose group was 15 cases (34.9%),8 cases (38.1%) and 5 cases (45.5%) respectively.It showed an increasing trend,but no statistically significant difference.The single factors related to OS mainly include the effective time of first-line endocrine therapy,hemoglobin level,ECOG score,pain score,number of cycles of chemotherapy,there was no significant correlation with age,docetaxel dose,ALP and PSA value.Conclusions It is common to receive lower doses of docetaxel in clinical practice for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in China.The efficacy of low-dose docetaxel is similar to that of high doses (standard dosage).There was no significant correlation between the OS and the actual dose of docetaxel in the tolerable range.

3.
Chinese Journal of Urology ; (12): 615-618, 2017.
Article de Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-610926

RÉSUMÉ

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the modified docetaxel plus prednisone scheme for the metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients who got poor tolerance to chemotherapy.Method The clinical data of 50 metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer who received docetaxel + prednisone chemotherapy from March 2010 to October 2015 were analyzed retrospectively.23 cases received the modified DP regimen (modified group),27 cases received the standard DP regimen (standard group).The median age of the modified group and the standard group were 69 years (47-80 years) and 63 years (52-77 years) (P =0.005).There were 19 and 24 cases with pain in modified group and standard group respectively;10 and 19 cases with lymph node metastasis respectively;3 and 4 cases of visceral metastasis respectively;all of the 50 patients were complicated with bone metastasis.For the pathological Gleason score,there were 7 cases scored ≤7 points,13 cases scored ≥ 8 points and 3 cases unscored in the modified group;7 cases scored ≤7 points,15 cases scored ≥8 points and 5 cases unscored in standard group.There was no significant difference of the pain,metastasis,and Gleason score between the two groups (P > 0.05).Progression free survival (PFS),overall survival (OS)and adverse events were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves,and the differences were assessed using the log-rank test.Results In the modified group and standard group,the median follow-up times were 11.0 months and 14.0 months respectively,the median chemotherapy cycles were 4.5 cycles and 5.0 cycles respectively;OS were 18.0 months and 27.5 months respectively (P =0.746).The PFS of the two groups were 6.0 months and 5.2 months,respectively (P =0.822).The PSA response were 13 cases and 17 cases in the modified group and standard group respectively (P =0.615),and the pain response were 8 cases and 7 cases (P =0.927),grade 3 to 4 adverse events were 3 cases and 14 cases (P =0.003).The main adverse events were blood toxicity,neutrophils,gastrointestinal reaction,edema,fatigue and oral mucositis etc.Conclusions Compared with the standard DP scheme,the modified DP scheme had no significant difference in OS,PFS,pain response rate and PSA response rate,while the incidence of grade 3 to 4 adverse events was significantly reduced.Modified DP scheme may be a better choice for patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer who get poor tolerance to chemotherapy.

SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE