Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtre
1.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery ; (12): 299-302, 2016.
Article Dans Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-490499

Résumé

At present surgical treatment is a main method for gastric cancer,while multidisciplinary comprehensive treatment for gastric cancer has gradually become the mainstream direction of treatment,which is based on regarding patients as the core part of treatment,aiming at specific disease,building multidisciplinary team and making individualized,standardized,scientific and continuous comprehensive treatment plan.Meanwhile,it can provide the best treatment option and efficacy for particular patients,and raise the diagnostic and treatment skills and academic level.There are obvious promotions in the integration between medical education and health management and the progresses of medicine and science.

2.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery ; (12): 1097-1100, 2016.
Article Dans Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-323526

Résumé

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the value of en-bloc mesogastric excision (EME) in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A retrospective analysis on clinical data of 98 gastric cancer patients who underwent total gastrectomy in China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University from January 2013 to December 2015 was carried out, including EME group of 48 cases (according to the mesangial space) and D2 radical group of 50 cases(D2 lymphadenectomy according to the vascular markers). Operations were performed by the same single surgeon team. Surgical indexes and recent efficacy indexes were compared between two groups.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>General informations pertaining to two groups were comparable (P>0.05). All the operations were performed successfully. Compared with D2 radical group, EME group had a shorter operative time [(155.3±13.6) vs. (171.2±14.9) minutes, P=0.012] and less intraoperative blood loss [(95.1±19.5) vs.(122.6±28.0) milliliters, P=0.011]. There were no significant differences in the number of harvested lymph node (30.8±3.9 vs. 31.5±4.7, P=0.675), time to postoperative bowel function return [(3.2±1.2) vs.(3.9±1.4) days, P=0.179], postoperative hospital stay [(10.9±2.7) vs.(11.3±3.2) days, P=0.788], and the incidence of postoperative complication [8.3% vs. 10.0%, P=0.775]. During the follow-up of 1 year, all the patients had no long-term complications, no tumor recurrence or death.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>For advanced gastric cancer, EME result in the same clinical efficacy compared with standard D2 resection. At the same time, EME can shorten the operative time and reduce the intraoperative blood loss, which is a new technology and worthy promoting.</p>


Sujets)
Sujet âgé , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Perte sanguine peropératoire , Défécation , Gastrectomie , Méthodes , Laparoscopie , Durée du séjour , Lymphadénectomie , Récidive tumorale locale , Durée opératoire , Complications postopératoires , Période postopératoire , Études rétrospectives , Tumeurs de l'estomac , Chirurgie générale , Résultat thérapeutique
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
Détails de la recherche