Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 3 de 3
Filtre
1.
Journal of Experimental Hematology ; (6): 1410-1413, 2020.
Article Dans Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-827103

Résumé

Plasmablastic lymphoma(PBL) shows a low incidence and poor prognosis, moreover, there is no standard treatment regimen for PBL. The treatment effect and value of CHOP regimen and radiotherapy are limited. Some studies showed that intensive chemotherapy alone or its combination with proteasome inhibitors or immune regulator can improve the overall survival of patients with PBL, which can be used as the first-line therapy for PBL patients. CAR-T and immunocheckpoint inhibitors showed treatment effect for the patients with refractory and relapsed plasmablastic lymphoma. The clinical value of potential targets in treating tumour worth to be studied further.


Sujets)
Humains , Lymphome plasmoblastique
2.
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Medical Sciences) ; (6): 260-264, 2014.
Article Dans Anglais | WPRIM | ID: wpr-351086

Résumé

This retrospective analysis compared standard regimen of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) with the dose-dense ABVD regimen (ABVD-21) in terms of efficacy and toxicity. Patients who had early-stage unfavorable or advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) according to German Hodgkin Study Group criteria from March 1999 to February 2011 were analyzed for treatment response, long-term survival and hematological toxicity. There were 85 patients in the ABVD-21 group and 118 patients in the ABVD group respectively. The complete remission rates after completion of treatment were 92.9% and 90.7% for ABVD-21 and ABVD, respectively. During a median follow-up period of 62 months, no significant difference was found in projected 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates (84.7% and 94.1% respectively for ABVD-21; 81.4% and 91.5% for ABVD). Subgroup analyses showed that ABVD-21 was significantly better than ABVD for patients with IPS≥3 in terms of PFS and OS rates. Grade 3 to 4 leukopenia (51.8% vs. 28.8%, P=0.001) and neutropenia (57.6% vs. 39.0%, P=0.009) were more common with ABVD-21. We were led to conclude that dose-dense ABVD did not result in better tumor control and overall survival than did ABVD for early-stage unfavorable HL. However, patients at high risk, for example, with IPS≥3, may benefit from dose-dense ABVD.


Sujets)
Adulte , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Protocoles de polychimiothérapie antinéoplasique , Bléomycine , Association thérapeutique , Méthodes , Dacarbazine , Survie sans rechute , Relation dose-effet des médicaments , Doxorubicine , Maladie de Hodgkin , Traitement médicamenteux , Anatomopathologie , Stadification tumorale , Prednisone , Études rétrospectives , Vinblastine
3.
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Medical Sciences) ; (6): 260-4, 2014.
Article Dans Anglais | WPRIM | ID: wpr-636684

Résumé

This retrospective analysis compared standard regimen of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) with the dose-dense ABVD regimen (ABVD-21) in terms of efficacy and toxicity. Patients who had early-stage unfavorable or advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) according to German Hodgkin Study Group criteria from March 1999 to February 2011 were analyzed for treatment response, long-term survival and hematological toxicity. There were 85 patients in the ABVD-21 group and 118 patients in the ABVD group respectively. The complete remission rates after completion of treatment were 92.9% and 90.7% for ABVD-21 and ABVD, respectively. During a median follow-up period of 62 months, no significant difference was found in projected 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates (84.7% and 94.1% respectively for ABVD-21; 81.4% and 91.5% for ABVD). Subgroup analyses showed that ABVD-21 was significantly better than ABVD for patients with IPS≥3 in terms of PFS and OS rates. Grade 3 to 4 leukopenia (51.8% vs. 28.8%, P=0.001) and neutropenia (57.6% vs. 39.0%, P=0.009) were more common with ABVD-21. We were led to conclude that dose-dense ABVD did not result in better tumor control and overall survival than did ABVD for early-stage unfavorable HL. However, patients at high risk, for example, with IPS≥3, may benefit from dose-dense ABVD.

SÉLECTION CITATIONS
Détails de la recherche