RÉSUMÉ
O objetivo no presente estudo foi avaliar o desempenho de discentes, que participaram do Programa de Monitoria no Curso de Odontologia da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora em disciplinas com práticas clínicas, em relação à construção do diagnóstico e plano de tratamento, comparando essas habilidades com as apresentadas por alunos não monitores. Para isso foi aplicado um questionário a 12 alunos que haviam participado do programa de monitoria em disciplinas com práticas clínicas e a 12 alunos não monitores. O questionário foi composto por seis questões sobre o perfil dos discentes monitores e a experiência desses alunos com o programa; e por três casos clínicos fictícios, que permitiram a avaliação da construção do diagnóstico e do plano de tratamento. As respostas das questões sobre o perfil dos discentes foram apresentadas em frequências absolutas e relativas. Testes t para amostras independentes foram utilizados para comparar as notas dos discentes monitores e não monitores para cada caso clínico. Os resultados obtidos mostraram que não houve diferença significativa entre os dois grupos avaliados nas pontuações obtidas pelas respostas aos casos clínicos. Dentre os motivos que levaram os discentes a participar dos programas de monitoria, destacam-se: "oportunidade de reforçar o conhecimento", "aumentar a pontuação do currículo" e "por causa da remuneração". O interesse pela docência foi a justificativa menos prevalente. Pode-se concluir que, mesmo queo resultado não tenha mostrado diferença entre os discentes, a prática da monitoria tem sido relevante, colaborando para o desenvolvimento de competências e habilidades que são indispensáveis à formação do cirurgião-dentista (AU).
El objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar el desempeño de los estudiantes que participaron del Programa de Tutoría de la Carrera de Odontología de la Universidade Federal de Juiz de Foraen materias con prácticas clínicas, en relación a la construcción del plan dediagnóstico y tratamiento, comparando estas habilidades con las presentadas por estudiantes no tutores. Para ello se aplicó un cuestionario a 12 estudiantes que habían participado en el programa de tutoría en asignaturas con prácticas clínicas y a 12 estudiantes no tutores. El cuestionario constaba de seis preguntas sobre el perfil de los estudiantes tutores y su experiencia con el programa; y tres casos clínicos ficticios, que permitieron evaluar la construcción del diagnóstico y plan de tratamiento. Las respuestas a las preguntas sobre el perfil de los estudiantes se presentaron en frecuencias absolutas y relativas. Se utilizaron pruebas T para muestras independientes para comparar las puntuaciones de los estudiantes tutores y no tutores para cada caso clínico. Los resultados obtenidos mostraron que no hubo diferencia significativa entre los dos grupos evaluados en las puntuaciones obtenidas de las respuestas a los casos clínicos. Entre los motivos que llevaron a los estudiantes a participar en programasde tutoría destacan: "oportunidad de reforzar conocimientos", "aumentar la puntuación del currículo" y "por la remuneración". El interés por la enseñanza fue la justificación menos frecuente. Se puede concluir que, si bien el resultado no mostró diferencia entre los estudiantes, la práctica de tutoría ha sido relevante, contribuyendo al desarrollo de habilidades y habilidades esenciales para la formación de los cirujanos dentistas (AU).
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of students, who participated in the Monitoring Program of the Dentistry Course at the Federal University of Juiz de Fora, in subjects with clinical practices, relative to construction of the diagnosis and treatment plan, to compare these skills with those presented by non-monitor students. For this purpose, a questionnaire was applied to 12 students who had participated in the monitoring program in subjects with clinical practices, and to 12 students who werenot monitors. The questionnaire consisted of six questions about the profile of student monitors and their experience with the program; and three fictitious clinical cases that allowed evaluation of the construction of the diagnosis and treatment plan. The answers to the questions about the students' profile were presented in absolute and relative frequencies. For each clinical case, T-tests for independent samples were used to compare the scores of student monitors and students who were not monitors. The results obtained showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups evaluated, relative to the scores attributed to the responses to the clinical cases. Among the reasons that led students to participating in monitoring programs, the following were outstanding: "opportunity to reinforce knowledge", "increase the CV score" and "because of the remuneration". Interest in teaching was the least prevalent justification. It can be concluded that although the result did not show a difference between students, the practice of monitoring has been relevant, by contributing to the development of skills and abilities that are essential to the training of dental surgeons (AU).
Sujet(s)
Humains , Planification des soins du patient , Étudiant dentisterie , Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques en santé , Mentorat , Études transversales/méthodes , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Statistique non paramétriqueRÉSUMÉ
Abstract This review aimed to assess the association between overweight/obesity and dental caries in Brazilian children/adolescents. Searches were performed in the Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, PubMed, Embase and SciELO, Lilacs and Open Grey literature databases up to June 2022. The Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies, the checklist for cohort studies, and the checklist for case-control studies were used. A total of 41 publications were included, and 15 meta-analyses were performed. The authors analyzed the differences in weighted mean difference (MD) and odds ratios (OR), and their corresponding confidence intervals (CI) (95%) for dental caries among eutrophic and obese and/or overweight children/adolescents. Meta-analyses showed that there was no association between overweight and/or obesity and dental caries in Brazilian children/adolescents for most anthropometric reference curves using BMI (Body Mass Index). A greater experience of dental caries was associated with well-nourished adolescents in permanent dentition, compared with obese individuals in the same dentition, as classified by the CDC 2000 curve (OR = 2.53, 95% CI;1.49-4.29; p = 0.0006; I2 = 0%) in dichotomous outcome studies, and (MD = 0.61, 95%CI: 0.08-1.15; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%) in continuous studies. The strength of the evidence of the results was classified as very low, low or moderate. It was concluded that there is no association between overweight and/or obesity and dental caries in Brazilian children/adolescents for most anthropometric reference curves using BMI. A greater experience of dental caries was associated with well-nourished adolescents in permanent dentition, compared with obese individuals in the same dentition, as classified by the CDC 2000 curve.