Research of TLD calibrated in different standard X-ray RQR radiation field in terms of eye lens dose Hp (3) / 中华放射医学与防护杂志

Objective To compare the calibration result of standard X-ray RQR radiation field between SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB (France),and to explore the feasibility of calibrating Hp (3) in standard X-ray RQR radiation field of SSDL (NIRP).Methods Using a column model with a diameter and high of 20 cm,TLD was calibrated in SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB (France) to measure the personal dose equivalent eye lens dose Hp (3),X-ray RQR radiation field included RQR4 (60 kV),RQR7 (90 kV),RQR9 (120 kV),with energy response,angle response and linear response.Results In terms of energy response,the calibration results of TLD in both SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB (France) were in good agreement.The difference between exposure value and response value was less than 10％.In terms of angle response,the calibration result of TLD in CEA LIST LNHB (France) was better in SSDL (NIRP).The difference between exposure value and response value in CEA LIST LNHB (France) was less than 6％,while the difference between exposure value and response value in SSDI (NIRP) was more than 10％ at angle of 20°.In terms of linear response,both calibration result of SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB (France) were in good agreement.Conclusions The standard X-ray RQR field in SSDL (NIRP) can be used for the calibration of Hp (3).

Spindle assembly checkpoint complex-related genes TTK and MAD2L1 are over-expressed in lung adenocarcinoma: a big data and bioinformatics analysis / 南方医科大学学报

OBJECTIVE@#To screen the key genes related to the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma through big data analysis and explore their clinical value and potential mechanism.@*METHODS@#We analyzed GSE18842, GSE27262, and GSE33532 gene expression profile data obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Bioinformatics methods were used to screen the differentially expressed genes in lung adenocarcinoma tissues and KEGG and GO enrichment analysis was performed, followed by PPI interaction network analysis, module analysis, differential expression analysis, and prognosis analysis. The expressions of MAD2L1 and TTK by immunohistochemistry were verified in 35 non-small cell lung cancer specimens and paired adjacent tissues.@*RESULTS@#We identified a total of 256 genes that showed significant differential expressions in lung adenocarcinoma, including 66 up-regulated and 190 down-regulated genes. Thirty-two up-regulated core genes were screened by functional analysis, and among them 29 were shown to significantly correlate with a poor prognosis of patients with lung adenocarcinoma. All the 29 genes were highly expressed in lung adenocarcinoma tissues compared with normal lung tissues and were mainly enriched in cell cycle pathways. Seven of these key genes were closely related to the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) complex and responsible for regulating cell behavior in G2/M phase. We selected SAC-related proteins TTK and MAD2L1 to test their expressions in clinical tumor samples, and detected their overexpression in lung adenocarcinoma tissues as compared with the adjacent tissues.@*CONCLUSIONS@#Seven SAC complex-related genes, including TTK and MAD2L1, are overexpressed in lung adenocarcinoma tissues with close correlation with the prognosis of the patients.

Research of TLD calibrated in different standard X-ray RQR radiation field in terms of eye lens dose Hp(3) / 中华放射医学与防护杂志

Objective@#To compare the calibration result of standard X-ray RQR radiation field between SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB(France), and to explore the feasibility of calibrating Hp(3) in standard X-ray RQR radiation field of SSDL(NIRP).@*Methods@#Using a column model with a diameter and high of 20 cm, TLD was calibrated in SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB (France) to measure the personal dose equivalent eye lens dose Hp(3), X-ray RQR radiation field included RQR4(60 kV), RQR7(90 kV), RQR9(120 kV), with energy response, angle response and linear response.@*Results@#In terms of energy response, the calibration results of TLD in both SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB (France) were in good agreement. The difference between exposure value and response value was less than 10%. In terms of angle response, the calibration result of TLD in CEA LIST LNHB (France) was better in SSDL(NIRP). The difference between exposure value and response value in CEA LIST LNHB (France) was less than 6%, while the difference between exposure value and response value in SSDL(NIRP) was more than 10% at angle of 20°. In terms of linear response, both calibration result of SSDL (NIRP) and CEA LIST LNHB (France) were in good agreement.@*Conclusions@#The standard X-ray RQR field in SSDL (NIRP) can be used for the calibration of Hp(3).