Survival analysis of 220 patients with completely resected stage-II non-small cell lung cancer / 癌症

<p><b>BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE</b>Surgery is the main therapy for patients with stage II non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but patients still have an unsatisfactory prognosis even though complete resection is usually possible. Adjuvant chemotherapy provides low rates of clinical benefit as well. We retrospectively analyzed prognostic factors of patients with completely resected stage II NSCLC to find patients with unfavorable factors for proper management.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Clinical data of 220 patients with complete resections of stage II NSCLC at the Sun Yat sen University Cancer Center between January 1998 and December 2004 were retrospectively analyzed. Cumulative survival was analyzed by the Kaplan Meier method and compared by log rank test. Prognosis was analyzed by the Cox proportional hazards model.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The overall 3 and 5 year survival rates were 58.8% and 47.9%, respectively. The 3 and 5 year disease free survival rates were 45.8% and 37.0%, respectively. Of the 220 patients, 86 (39.1%) had recurrence or metastasis. A univariate analysis demonstrated that age (> 55 years), blood type, the presence of symptoms, chest pain, tumor volume (> 20 cm3), total number of removed lymph nodes (> or = 10), number of involved N1 lymph nodes (> or =3 ), total number of removed N2 lymph nodes (> 6), and the ratio of involved N1 lymph nodes (> or = 35%) were significant prognostic factors for 5 year survival. In the multivariate analysis, age (> 55 years), chest pain, tumor volume (> 20 cm3), total number of removed lymph nodes (> or = 10), and number of involved N1 lymph nodes (> or = 3) were independent prognostic factors for 5 year survival.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>For patients with completely resectable stage II NSCLC, having > 55 years, presenting chest pain, tumor volumes > 20 cm3, and > or = 3 involved N1 lymph nodes were adverse prognostic factors, and > or = 10 removed lymph nodes was a favorable one. Patients with poor prognoses might be treated by individual adjuvant therapy for better survival.</p>

The results and prognosis of different treatment modalities for solitary metastatic lung tumor from nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective study of 105 cases / 癌症

<p><b>BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE</b>Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is known for its propensity for distant metastases. Lung metastasis is one of the most important causes of death for patients with NPC. Solitary metastatic lung tumor from NPC is a distinctive group associated with a better survival. This study was to find a more effective treatment modality and prognostic factors for the group.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Clinical data of 105 cases of solitary metastatic lung tumor from NPC were retrospectively analyzed. Survival rate was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The difference of survival between the patients treated by different modalities was evaluated by the log-rank test. The Cox univariate and multivariate analyses of gender, age, pathologic type, stage, adjuvant chemotherapy, evaluation of treatment for NPC, disease-free interval, size of metastatic tumor, pulmonary hilar and/or mediastinal lymph node metastasis, treatment modalities, recurrent distant metastases and/or relapse of NPC were conducted.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The local control rate was 53.8% in chemotherapy group, 88.0% in radiotherapy ± chemotherapy group, and 96.4% in operation ± chemotherapy group (P < 0.01). The most promising progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were obtained with operation ± chemotherapy and followed by radiotherapy ± chemotherapy. Both of them showed much better efficacy than chemotherapy (P < 0.001). The Cox multivariate analysis showed that recurrent distant metastases and/or relapse of NPC affected the survival (OR = 2.087, 95% CI = 1.277-3.410, P = 0.003). The T stage of NPC, size of metastatic tumor, hilar and/or mediastinal lymph node metastasis, and the treatment modality were independent prognostic factors.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Operation ± chemotherapy and radiotherapy ± chemotherapy are better treatment of solitary metastatic lung tumor from NPC, which could improve the local control and prolong the PFS and OS. Chemotherapy is recommended for patients with higher T stage of NPC, size of metastatic tumor ≥ 3 cm, pulmonary hilar and/or mediastinal lymph node metastasis.</p>

Prognostic effect of mediastinal lymph node dissection in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer / 中华外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the prognostic effect of mediastinal lymph node dissection in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The clinical data of 330 patients with stage I NSCLC who were treated with curative resection from January 1994 to December 2003 were reviewed retrospectively. According to the extent of mediastinal lymph node dissection and the pathology report, the patients were assigned to lung resection combined with mediastinal lymph node dissection (LND) group or with lymph node sampling (LNS) group. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. COX proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>There were 233 (70.6%) male patients and 97 (29.4%) female patients. The median age was 60 years old. Ninety-eight patients were in stage IA and 233 in stage IB. One hundred and forty patents were in group LND and 190 in group LNS. The mean number of removed lymph nodes in group LND and group LNS were (13.3 +/- 4.7) and (5.2 +/- 3.0) (P < 0.01), respectively. The mean of mediastinal lymph node station sampled in group LND and group LNS were (3.7 +/- 0.9) and (1.3 +/- 1.1) (P < 0.01), respectively. The 5-year and 10-year survival rates of patients in group LND were 72.0% and 66.1%, while in group LNS were 65.9% and 43.0% (P < 0.05), respectively. Other prognostic factors included symptom, staging, visceral pleura invasion and tumor size. LND was disclosed as a favourable prognostic factor at COX multivariate analysis, together with absence of symptom at diagnosis.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>As compared with LNS, LND can improve survival in stage I NSCLC.</p>