Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrer
Plus de filtres








Sujet Principal
Gamme d'année
1.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-226706

RÉSUMÉ

Background: The objective of the current study was to analyse the anti-inflammatory effects of the aqueous extract of Stephania rotunda in experimental animals. Methods: It was an experimental study conducted in the experimental laboratory with 30 acclimatized healthy albino rats and mice divided into 5 groups namely A, B, C, D, and E fed with the aqueous extract of Stephania rotunda in laboratory conditions to assess the anti-inflammatory property using Carrageenan induced rat paw oedema for acute inflammation, granuloma pouch for sub-acute inflammation and Formaldehyde induced arthritis for chronic inflammation from 17th December 2019 to 22nd January 2021. Aspirin was taken as the standard drug. Data was analysed using Chi-square test. Results: In assessment for acute inflammation, the aqueous extract of Stephania rotunda in the doses of 500 mg/kg, 1000 mg/kg and 2000 mg/kg for groups B, C and D respectively produced 17.12%, 17.12% and 18.78% inhibition of paw oedema which was statistically significant when compared to 22.65% inhibition produced by 100mg/kg of the standard drug aspirin in group E. The groups B, C and D with the extract doses of 500mg/kg, 1000mg/kg and 2000mg/kg produced 43%, 60% and 77% inhibitions of exudate formation respectively which statistically was significant as compared to the Standard aspirin of group E which produced 62% inhibition of exudate formation. In chronic inflammation testing, both the extract and standard drugs produced highly significant inhibition of paw oedema when compared to inhibition produced by the Control. Conclusions: The aqueous extract of Stephania rotunda was found to be a potent anti-inflammatory drug when compared with Aspirin. Further tests are required in a larger scale so as to ascertain the effects for human consumption.

2.
Cuad. Hosp. Clín ; 54(1): 3-4, 2009. ilus
Article de Espagnol | LILACS | ID: lil-779268

RÉSUMÉ

El presente trabajo se realizó en razón del tercer veto emitido por la FIFA, de jugar partidos eliminatorios para Copas Mundiales de Fútbol en alturas por encima de los 2500 m. Los objetivos del estudio se basaron en las preocupaciones de la FIFA por la preservación de la salud de los jugadores de fútbol y por la garantía de oportunidades iguales respecto al rendimiento físico cuando se juega a gran altura. En consecuencia se hizo un estudio comparativo entre un equipo de fútbol aclimatado a la altura de la Paz (3600 m) (equipo HAT; 10 jugadores) y otro equipo que vivía y entrenaba en una altura cercana a nivel del mar (60 m) (equipo LAT; 10 jugadores). Ambos equipos fueron estudiados en los laboratorios del Instituto Boliviano de Biología de Altura (IBBA) y en altura cercana al nivel del mar (Hotel América; Santa Cruz, 420m). La salud fue evaluada aplicando el cuestionario de Lake Louise para establecer la presencia de Enfermedad Aguda de Altura (EAA), así como mediante pruebas funcionales respiratorias y estimación de la presión arterial pulmonar sistólica(PAPs) mediante Eco Doppler. El rendimiento físico fue evaluado mediante prueba de esfuerzo máximo en rampa conmedición del consumo máximo de oxígeno (VO2max) y parámetros relacionados. Los resultados mostraron valores delVO2max algo mayores en la altura en HAT que en LAT. PAPs fue significativamente mayor a gran altura en ambos equipos. Proponemos un tiempo de aclimatación de 72 horas previa a los partidos de fútbol en La Paz en base a las estadísticas elaboradas que toman en cuenta el resultado de los partidos en relación con el tiempo de estadía en La Paz.


The present study was conducted as response to the third veto by FIFA against playing eliminatory football games forFIFA World Cups at altitudes above 2500 m. The aim of the study took into account FIFA ́s preoccupations with regard tothe health of the football players and concerning igual opportunities for physical performance when playing at high altitude. Consequently, a comparative study was conducted of two football teams, one acclimatized to the altitude of La Paz (3600m) (HAT, 10 players), and the second one living and training at an altitude close to sealevel (60 m) (LAT, 10 players). Bothteams were examined in the laboratories of he Instituto Boliviano de Biología de Altura (IBBA) and at an altitude close tosealevel (Hotel América, Santa Cruz, 420 m). Health was assessed applying the Lake Louise scoring system for AcuteAltitude Sickness as well as by measuring pulmonary function and by assessing systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PAPs)using theEcho Doppler technique. The physical capacity was measured by a progressive maximal exercise test on atreadmillwith determination of the maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) andrelated parmeters. The results I howed a VO2max somwht higher at high altitude in HAT than in LAT. PAPs was significantly higher at high than at low altitude in bothteams. Wepropose an acclimatization time of 72 hours previous to football games in La Paz based on statistics that tookinto account the results of the games in relation to the time of the stay in La Paz.


Sujet(s)
Humains , Mâle , Adulte , Football/traumatismes , Bolivie , Médecine du sport/instrumentation
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE