Résumé
Objective:To evaluate the clinical effect of Toric design orthokeratology in myopic teenagers with mild-to-moderate astigmatism.Methods:A non-randomized controlled clinical study was conducted.Eighty juvenile myopia patients (160 eyes) diagnosed with mild to moderate astigmatism with myopia after mydriatic computer optometry and received the treatment of orthokeratology at Zhejiang Rongjun Hospital from January 2016 to June 2017 were enrolled.The patients were divided into regular spherical design orthokeratology group and Toric design orthokeratology group, with 80 eyes (40 cases) in each group.The patients wore orthokeratology for 8 to 10 hours every night and were re-examined at 1 day, 1 week and 1, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after wearing, respectively.The visual acuity, refraction, corneal health status and central deviation of the treatment area in the corneal topography map were measured and recorded during the 18-month treatment.The complications during treatment were recorded.After 12-month wearing, the uncorrected visual acuity and the center deviation of the treatment area were compared between the two groups.After 18-month wearing, patients in the two groups stopped wearing the orthokeratology lens for 1 month, and then the refraction examination, IOLMaster and corneal topography were performed to compare the spherical equivalent, axial length and degree of astigmatism.This study protocol adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by an Ethics Committee of Zhejiang Rongjun Hospital (No.2020-10). Written informed consent was obtained from guardians prior to any medical examination.Results:After 12-month wearing, the center deviation of the shaping treatment area was (0.86±0.23)mm in the Toric design orthokeratology group, which was significantly lower than (1.16±0.44)mm in the regular spherical design orthokeratology group ( t=5.404, P<0.001). After 12-month wearing, the uncorrected visual acuity was (0.03±0.08) LogMAR in the Toric design orthokeratology group, which was significantly higher than (0.09±0.10) LogMAR in the regular spherical design orthokeratology group ( t=2.963, P=0.004). The spherical equivalent and the axial length of Toric design orthokeratology group were significantly smaller than those of the regular spherical design orthokeratology group ( t=2.542, 2.107; both at P<0.05), and there was no statistically significant difference in the degree of astigmatism between the two groups ( t=0.821, P=0.413). During the 18-month follow-up, the adverse reaction, punctate corneal epithelial opacity, occurred in 18 eyes.The incidence of adverse effect was 6.26%(5/80) in the Toric design orthokeratology group, which was significantly lower than the 16.25% (13/80) in the regular spherical design orthokeratology group ( χ2=3.897, P=0.048). Conclusions:The Toric design orthokeratology shows better efficacy in myopia control as well as reducing the adverse reaction rate in juvenile myopia, and it can better solve the deviation in corneal shaping in the use of regular spherical design orthokeratology.
Résumé
Objective: To compare refractive and vectorial outcomes of limbal relaxing incisions (LRI) versus toric intraocular lenses (IOL) in the treatment of preexisting corneal astigmatism at the time of phacoemulsification. Methods: This longitudinal observational case series assessed 62 eyes of 31 consecutive cataract patients with preoperative corneal astigmatism between 0.75 and 2.50 diopters in both eyes. Patients were randomly assorted in two groups: one assigned to receive AcrySof Toric™ IOL in both eyes, and another one assigned to have AcrySof Natural™ IOL associated with LRI, also in both eyes. All patients were re-evaluated, postoperatively, at 1, 3 and 6 months, when refractive astigmatism analysis was performed using vectorial methods proposed by Thibos. Variability of outcomes within each group and between groups were assessed and compared. Results: Manifest refractive cylinder, in diopters (D), as means ± standard deviation, in the LRI group for 1-month, 3-month and 6-month re-evalutions were respectively -0.66 ± 0.30; -0.70 ± 0.21 and -0.74 ± 0.26 when compared to -0.58 ± 0.24; -0.63 ± 0.20, and -0.62 ± 0.17 in the toric IOL group. (p value ≥ 0.06). Vectorial analysis evidenced greater astigmatism reduction in the toric IOL group in the 6th postoperative month, when postoperative mean astigmatic power vector was 0.31 D, when compared to 0.37 D in the LRI group (p value = 0.00). Conclusions: A trend of slightly better refractive outcomes favoring toric IOL group was seen, although such a trend was not statistically significant. Vectorial analysis, however, suggests that the use of toric IOL may constitute a more advantageous approach in the treatment of pre-existing corneal astigmatism, simultaneously with phacoemulsification. .
Objetivo: Comparar os resultados refracionais e de análise vetorial, das incisões relaxantes limbares (IRL) versus lentes intraoculares (LIO) tóricas no tratamento do astigmatismo corneano pré-existente por ocasião da facoemulsificação. Métodos: Estudo observacional longitudinal (série de casos) no qual foram avaliados 62 olhos de 31 pacientes consecutivos de catarata com astigmatismo corneano pré-operatório entre 0,75 e 2,50 dioptrias para ambos os olhos. Os pacientes foram aleatoriamente distribuídos entre 2 grupos: um submetido a implante de LIO AcrySof Toric™ em ambos os olhos e outo grupo no qual seriam implantas LIO AcrySof Natural™ complementada por IRL, também em ambos os olhos. Todos os pacientes foram reavaliados com 1, 3 e 6 meses de pós-operatório, sendo feitas análises do astigmatismo refracional pelo métodos vetorial proposto por Alpins, interessando a variação de resultados dentro de cada grupo e entre os grupos. Resultados: O cilindro refracional manifesto, em dioptrias, expresso como média ± desvio padrão, para o grupo IRL, nas avaliações de 1, 3 e 6 meses, foram respectivamente -0,66 ± 0,30; -0,70 ± 0,21 e -0,74 ± 0,26 em comparação aos -0,58 ± 0,24; -0,63 ± 0,20 and -0,62 ± 0,17 do grupo LIO tórica (valor de p ≥ 0,06). A análise vetorial evidenciou maior redução no astigmatismo no grupo LIO tórica no 6º mês pós-operatório, para o qual vetor de poder astigmático médio foi de 0,31 D, comparado ao de 0,37 D do grupo IRL (valor de p = 0,00). Conclusões: Tendência a melhores resultados refracionais favorecendo o grupo LIO tórica foi encontrada, entretanto, significância estatística não foi evidenciada ao longo do estudo. A análise vetorial, sugere ...