Guided bone regeneration using preformed titanium mesh combined with bioabsorbable membranes in aesthetic area / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND: Absorbable and non-absorbable barrier membranes have their own merits and demerits in the guided bone regeneration. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical effect of new preformed titanium mesh combined with different bone augmentation materials in anterior teeth with inadequate bone volume for dental implants. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with single maxillary anterior tooth loss were divided into three groups: Bio-Gide collagen membrane + Bio-oss bone group (C; n=12), titanium mesh + Bio-Gide collagen membrane + Bio-Oss bone group (TC; n=10), titanium mesh + concentrated growth factor + Bio-Gide collagen membrane + Bio-Oss bonegroup (TCC; n=9). Through clinical review, cone-beam CT and histological examination, osteogenic effects of the three treatment methods were compared and statistically analyzed at 0 day and 6 months after operation. The implementation of the study protocol complied with the relevant ethical requirements of Qingdao Stomatological Hospital, and each patient was fully informed of the trial process. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: In the postoperative review, only two patients in the TC group had wound deformations, and the wound healed about 3 weeks postoperation. Six months after the operation, cone-beam CT results revealed significant differences in bone height between the TCC and TC groups and the C group (P < 0.05), as well as in bone width at the mark points of 2, 4 and 6 mm (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in bone width between three groups at the mark point of 8 mm (P < 0.05). Hematoxylin-eosin staining of bone tissue around the implant showed that trabecular structure was visible in all three groups, but the structures was more mature and denser in the TCC group and sparser in the C group. These findings indicate that titanium mesh has good space maintenance function, better maintains the stability of bone graft material, and enhances the osteogenesis effect to a certain extent. Concentrated growth factors may promote soft tissue healing.

Clinical research of bioabsorbable membrane in prevention of Frey syndrome after parotidectomy / 中国基层医药

Objective To evaluate the effect of bioabsorbable membrane in prevention of Frey syndrome after parotidectomy.Methods 105 patients who suffering from benign tumor of parotid gland were divided into experimental group and control group randomly.53 cases in experimental group underwent insertion of bioabsorbable membrane after parotidectomy,while 52 cases in control group underwent parotidectomy without bioabsorbable membrane.After operation 6 to12 months,all 105 patients were evaluated for gustatory sweating by both questionnaire and minor starchiodine test.Results Subjective evaluation of Frey syndrome revealed that the incidence rate of experimental group and control group were 3.8％(2/53),28.9％(15/52)respectively(P ＜ 0.05).Objective evaluation of Frey syndrome revealed that the incidence rate of experimental group and control group were 9.4％(5/53),55.8％(29/52)(13/21)respectively(P ＜0.05).Conclusion Insertion of bioabsorbable membrane is an effective method for prevention of Frey's syndrome after parotidectomy.

The Effect of Resorbable Membrane on Bone Regeneration in Calvarial Defects of Rats

A comparative study of clinical effects following treatment of class II furcations using allograft and PR with and without bioabsorbable membrane / 대한치주과학회지

The present study evaluated of regeneration effect of platelet rich plasma on the treatment of classII furcation involvement, with allograft in humans. The control was treated without bioabsorbable membrane, and the test was treated with bioabsorbable membrane. Pocket depth, clinical attachment level, and gingival recession were measured at baseline, postoperative 3, 6months. Both groups were statistically analyzed by Wilcoxon signed Ranks Test & Mann-whitney Test using SPSS program (5% significance level). The results were as follows: 1. The change of pocket depth and clinical attachment level in both groups was decreased significantly at 3, 6months. (p<0.05) 2. The change of gingival recession in both groups was increased significantly at 3, 6months than at baseline. (p<0.05) 3. The change of pocket depth and clinical attachment level in both groups was increased significantly at 3, 6months, but there were no statistically or clinically significant differences with both groups. 4. The change of gingival recession in both groups was increased significantly at 3, 6months, but there were no statistically or clinically significant differences with both groups. 5. The significant reduction of the pocket depth and clinical attachment level exhibited marked changes at 3 months in both groups. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that there are no statistically or clinically significant differences between with and without bioabsorbable membrane on treatment of classII furcations using allograft and PRP

Guided Bone Regeneration Of Calvarial Bone Defects Using Bioabsorbable Membrane And Demineralized Freeze Dried Bone In Rats

The purpose of this study was to evaluate new bone formation and healing process in rat calvarial bone defects using BioMesh(R) membrane and DFDB. Forty eight rats divided equally into 4 groups of 1 control group and 3 experimental groups. Standardized transosseous circular calvarial defects (8 mm in diameter) were made midparietally. In the control group, the defect was only covered with the soft tissue flap. In the experimental group 1, it was filled with DFDB only, in the experimental group 2, it was covered BioMesh(R) membrane only, and in the experimental group 3, it was filled DFDB and covered with membrane. At the postoperative 1, 2, 4, 8 weeks, rats were sacrificed and histologic and histomorphometric analysis were performed. These results were as follows. In histomorphometric analysis, It showed the greatest amount of new bone formation through experimental in the experimental group 3 (P < 0.001). The amount of new bone formation at the central portion of the defect was greater in the experimental group 3 than experimental group 2. BioMesh(R) membrane began to resorb at 1 week and resorbed almost completely at 8 weeks after operation. The collapse of membrane into the defect was observed through the experimental periods in the experimental group 2. In the area of collapsed membrane, new bone formation was restricted. These results suggest that maintenance of some space for new bone to grow is required in the use of BioMesh(R) membrane alone in the defect. It is also thought that use of the membrane may promote new bone growth in DFDB graft.

Influence of Smoking on Short-Term Clinical Results of Periodontal Bone Defects Treated with Regenerative Therapy Using Bioabsorbable Membranes / 대한치주과학회지

This study compared the short-term(4 months) clinical results of regenerative therapy with bioabsorbable membranes(BioMesh(R)) and bone allograft for the treatment of periodontal(intrabony and furcation) defects in smokers and non-smokers.(16 smokers) 32 subjects with 92 defects participated in the study(46 in smokers and 46 in non-smokers). This study also evaluated a bioresorbable barrier with and without decalcified freezedried bone allograft(DFDBA). The 92 periodontal defects were randomly treated with either the resorbable barrier alone or resorbable barrier in combination with DFDBA following thorough defect debridement and root preparation with tetracycline. Each patient received both types of treatment modalities. Clinical examinations(probing depth, gingival recession, clinical attachment level, plaque index and gingival index) were carried out immediately before and 4 months after surgery. Significant(p<0.001) gains in mean attachment level were observed for both smokers(2.93mm) and nonsmokers(3.30mm) but there were not significant difference between two groups. Similarly, significant reductions in mean probing depthshowed for smokers(4.52mm) and non-smokers(4.26mm). However, when comparing gingival recession, smokers were found to exhibit significantly poorer treatment results(1.59mm vs 0.96mm, p<0.05). Using the split-mouth-design, no statistically significant difference between the two modalities could be detected with regard to pocket depth reduction, gingival recession, or attachment gain. These results illustrate that the attachment gain is better in the non-smoker and the best in the non-smoker with the combination therapy of resorbable barrier and DFDBA than with resorbable barrier alone but smoking had no significant effect on clinical treatment outcome, even though smokers show more significant gingival recession. In addition, both treatments, either resorbable barrier plus DFDBA or resorbable barrier alone, promoted significant resolution of periodontal defects but the addition of DFDBA with a bioabsorbable membrane appears to add no extra benefit to the only membrane treatment.