Résumé
Objective To summarize the epidemiological data of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) in China from 2013 to 2017 and to analyze its molecular epidemiological characteristics in order to provide scientific basis for improving prevention and control measures. Methods China National Knowledge In-frastructure,Wanfang Database of China,Chinese VIP Journal Net and Pubmed were used to search epidemio-logical data of HFMD published in recent years. National notification data and surveillance data of HFMD in ma-inland China were obtained from the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China and the World Health Organization. Basic statistic tools were used for data analysis. Results From 2013 to 2016, the inci-dence rates of HFMD were 134. 37/100 000, 203. 16/100 000, 145. 30/100 000, 176. 62/100 000 and 140.46/100 000,respectively. Enterovirus 71(EV71),coxsackievirus A16(CA16),CA6 and CA10 were the predominant pathogens causing HFMD in the first half of 2013-2017. CA6 was the main epidemic strain in most areas of China. EV71 remained the predominant pathogen causing severe HFMD, but CA6, CA16 and CA10 were also critical pathogens of concern. The predominant strains of enteroviruses varied with year and region. Conclusion Although the EV71 vaccine has been approved since 2016, HFMD has not been controlled com-pletely in China. It is badly in need of more comprehensive surveillance of other types of enteroviruses and HFMD polyvaccine to improve the prevention and control of HFMD.
Résumé
Objective To investigatethe constituents of enteroviruse which can cause hand‐foot‐and‐mouth disease(HFMD) ,and prevent against the development of new prevailing strains and provide basis for prevention and control of HFMD in Luoyang city . Methods Reverse‐transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) was used to identify the type of RNA of stool specimen of HFMD cases in Luoyang ,to distinguish the subtype of strain ,9 enterovirus‐positive specimens which coxcackie virusA16(CA16)‐and enterovirus71(EV71)‐negative were selected randomly for 5′UTR sequencing .strain‐specific primers were used to detect posi‐tive samples in 75 CA16‐ and EV71‐negative but other enterovirus‐positive specimens by using real time RT‐PCR .Composition characteristics of CA6 were further analyzed .Results Primary screening was conducted with the results of 5′UTR sequencing of 9 commonent erovirus‐positive specimens and there were 5 CA6‐positive ,which were prevailing strains;there were 20 CA6‐positive of 75 commonenterovirus‐positive specimens ,the proportion of CA6‐positive in enterovirus‐positive specimens was 29 .76% (25/84) . Thirteen samples were collected from male and 12 from female ,2 cases resulted in severe symptoms ,5 from city and 20 from coun‐try .Conclusion The composition of commonent erovirus which results in HFMD was complex and the proportion of CA6 was higher ,which should be pay more attention .
Résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) and 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) taste sensitivity varies among individuals. Recently, it is reported that PROP taste responsiveness is associated with carbonic anhydrase 6 (CA6) gene polymorphism. The CA6 gene, a zinc metalloprotein in human saliva, is affected in taste function and might be correlated with gustatory diversity. The aim of this study was to examine whether PTC taste sensitivity and taste disorder is associated with the CA6 gene polymorphism rs2274327 (C/T), rs2274328 (A/C), and rs2274333 (A/G). SUBJECTS AND METHOD: A total of 217 healthy normal subjects were recruited as controls, and 50 taste disorder patients were recruited as experimental group. The polymorphisms of CA6 gene were genotyped by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. All statistical analyses were calculated using the statistical package for the social science software. Haplotypes were estimated by Haploveiw and the PHASE programs. RESULTS: The CA6 gene polymorphisms showed association with taste disorder but not with PTC sensitivity (taster/nontaster). The number of control subjects carrying AA genotype of single nucleotide polymorphism rs2274328 (A/C) in the CA6 gene was higher than the number of the subjects with taste disorder (p=0.048). However, there was no association between controls and taste disorder subjects in the haplotype analysis. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the CA6 gene polymorphism rs2274328 could affect taste function impairment in patients with taste disorder. This observation requires a further functional study of gustin protein to clarify the association of the CA6 gene polymorphisms with the taste disorder and sensitivity.