Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtre
Ajouter des filtres








Gamme d'année
1.
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Medical Science) ; (12): 1360-1365, 2019.
Article Dans Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-843281

Résumé

Objective • To investigate the effects of levosimendan on kidney injury in the rat model of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Methods • Twentyfive healthy adult male SD rats were randomly divided into three groups, which were sham group (S group, n=5), levosimendan group (L group, n=10) and control group (C group, n=10). Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation procedure were created in L group and C group by inducing ventricular fibrillation. L group was treated with levosimendan during and after resuscitation, while C group and S group were given equivalent volume of saline solution. S group was not induced into cardiac arrest and resuscitation. Serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-10, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), creatinine (SCr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and cystatin-C (CysC) levels were compared between L group and C group at 1, 4 and 6 h after resuscitation.Three groups of rats were sacrificed, and the pathological changes of kidney tissues were observed at 6 h after resuscitation. Results • All rats were resuscitated successfully. No differences were found between the three groups about baseline data. After resuscitation, compared with S group, the levels of serum inflammatory cytokines and kidney function indicators increased dramatically (all P<0.05) in the other two groups. In resuscitation after 1, 4 and 6 h, the levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in L group were lower than those in C group, but IL-10 levels were higher in L group (P=0.000, P=0.002, P=0.036) than those in C group, and there were significant differences between the two groups (all P=0.000). In resuscitation after 1, 4 and 6 h, the levels of SCr (P=0.001, P=0.007, P=0.472), BUN (P=0.001, P=0.004, P=0.122) and CysC (P=0.493, P=0.001, P=0.175) were lower in L group than those in C group. Only 1 and 4 hours after resuscitation, the differences in the levels of SCr and BUN were significant, and only 4 hours after resuscitation, the difference in the level of CysC was significant between L group and C group. Both L and C group showed pathological characteristics of severe acute kidney injury, and the pathological injury scores of L group were alleviated compared with those of C group (all P=0.000). Conclusion • Levosimendan can improve kidney injury of cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation model rats.

2.
Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine ; (12): 1211-1214, 2009.
Article Dans Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-392204

Résumé

Objective To study the factors influenceing patients' family members to make own relative fac-tors patients' families making decision on refusal of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to the critical patients. Method Data were registered based on Utstein Style of 522 patients aged over 15 years, who subjected to in-hos-pital cardiac arrest(CA) in Department of Emergency of The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College from January 2005 to December 2008. A total of 157 patients' family made refusal decision among the 522 pa-tients, who belonged to the refusal group, and others belonged to the attempt resuscitation group. The associated factors included age, sex, marriage, household register, cause of CA, underlying diseases, capability of activity before CA, life supported with mechanical ventilation, and administration of pressor agents. The refusal decisions were evaluated by using univariate Logistical regression analysis, and then the statistical significant variables were analyzed by using muhivanate Logistical regression analysis. Results Age, household register, cause of CA(car-diac or traumatic),stroke, sudden death, cancer, capability of activity before CA, life supported with mechanical ventilation,and administration of pressor agents were the important factors of making refusal decision (P < 0.01), but sexes or marriage was insignificant related to the refusal decision (P > 0. O5). The independent risk factors re-lated to refusal decision were age (P = 0.034),cancer (P = 0.006),stroke (P = 0.003), and life supported with mechanical ventilation (P = 0.000) in multivariate Logistical regression analysis, but the protective factors were sudden death (P =0.000),cardiac CA (P =0.020) and traumatic CA(P =0.000). Conclusions Age over 60 years, cancer, stroke, and life suppoted with assisted ventilation before CA were factors associated with re-fusal decision making, yet sudden death, cardiac CA and traumatic CA were factors of accepting CPR.

SÉLECTION CITATIONS
Détails de la recherche