Efficacy and Safety of Azithromycin in Moderate Acne Vulgaris

@#Introduction: Acne vulgaris is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis caused by Propionibacterium acnes. Clinicians are constantly attempting to discover the best antibiotic regimes in treating acne vulgaris. This study compares two regimens in terms of efficacy, tolerability, compliance and recurrence rate to make recommendation on which is the best regime. Methods: An open-labelled prospective randomized investigator-blinded interventional study was carried on moderate acne vulgaris patients. Patients were assigned to treatment arm at enrolment followed by follow-up and maintenance visits. Demographic data were collected at enrolment and questionnaire enquiring acne condition, general health and quality of life impairment were filled at every visit followed by blinded dermatologist assessment. Antibiotic tablets were provided based on assigned arm until follow-up 3. Results: 26 mild acne vulgaris patients aged 17 to 29 years were recruited. Physician assessment based on GAGS and photo assessment analysis showed an overall significant change (p<0.05) with decreasing trend indicating that the treatment is statistically effective. However, no significant differences (p>0.05) were found between regimens. Similarly, patient self-perceived assessment and CADI assessment also showed overall significant changes (p<0.05) with increasing trend indicating improvement in acne condition but no significant differences (p<0.05) between regimens. Conclusion: Neither regimen were significantly more efficacious than another. In view of cost, oral azithromycin 500mg daily for consecutive 4 days monthly is suggested as a better option.

Impact on quality-of-life: before and after topical combinational treatment in patients of acne vulgaris.

Background: The objective was to study quality-of-life in patients of acne vulgaris before and after treatment by benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel and clindamycin 1% gel or benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel and nadifloxacin 1% cream or tretinoin 0.025% and clindamycin 1% gel. Methods: This was a prospective, open, randomized, parallel comparative study of 60 patients of acne vulgaris attending the Department of Dermatology and Venereal Diseases, Government Medical College, Rajindra Hospital, Patiala. Three groups were made 20 in each group, one group received benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel and clindamycin 1% gel, the second group received benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel, and nadifloxacin 1% cream and the third group received tretinoin 0.025% and clindamycin 1% gel. Cardiff acne disability index questionnaire was filled before starting and after the treatment. Results: In these three groups, it was found that the group on benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel and clindamycin 1% gel, mean score, before starting treatment was 8.35±3.48 and after treatment was 2.95±2.09 (p<0.001), group on benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel and nadifloxacin 1% cream, mean score, before starting treatment was 7.60±3.75 and after treatment was 5.80±2.98 (p<0.001) and group on tretinoin 0.025% and clindamycin 1% gel mean score is 8.00±3.06 and after treatment was 5.40±2.93 (p<0.001). Conclusion: Quality-of-life improves more in patients taking benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel and clindamycin 1% gel, and then, tretinoin 0.025% and clindamycin 1% gel and then benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel and nadifloxacin 1% cream.

Quality of life among schoolchildren with acne: Results of a cross-sectional study.

Background: Acne is a common problem in adolescent children and has a considerable impact on their quality of life. Aims: The purpose of this study was to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among Serbian adolescents with acne, using 2 questionnaires: The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) and the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI) and to provide a cross validation of 2 scales. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among the pupils of the secondary railway-technical school in Belgrade, Serbia. 478 pupils (aged 15 - 18 years) completed 2 HRQoL questionnaires: CDLQI and CADI. We used t-test for differences between mean values of CDLQI and CADI and Spearman's rho coefficient for correlation between 2 questionnaires. Results: Self-reported acne was present in 71.6% of pupils (64.3% boys and 35.7% girls). The overall mean CDLQI score (4.35 of max. 30) and the overall mean CADI score (3.57 of max. 15) were low, indicating a mild impairment of HRQoL among adolescants. There was good correlation between the 2 questionnaires (Spearman' rho = 0.66). Conclusion: The CADI and the CDLQI questionnaires represent simple and reliable instruments for the assesment of HRQoL among schoolchildren with acne. In this study, we identified 17% of boys and 18% of girls perceived their acne as a major problem. It is important to detect and treat such adolescents on time to reduce the psychosocial burden associated with acne.