Catéter peritoneal tunelizado para el manejo de ascitis refractaria en paciente con síndrome nefrótico

Introducción: la ascitis refractaria puede ser una complicación frecuente en el síndrome nefrótico (SN), existen casos reportados del uso de un catéter tunelizado de diálisis peritoneal en pacientes con cirrosis o neoplasias abdominales. Se presenta el caso de un paciente con SN en quién se utilizó un catéter para diálisis peritoneal (DP) para manejo de la ascitis refractaria. Objetivo: mostrar que el catéter peritoneal puede ser considerado como una alternativa para el manejo de la ascitis refractaria en pacientes con síndrome nefrótico. Presentación del caso: paciente varón de 19 años, sin antecedentes patológicos, cursó con edema progresivo y alteración de la función renal. Se evidenció síndrome nefrótico con anasarca y evolucionó con empeoramiento de la función renal ingresando a hemodiálisis de soporte. Se realizó biopsia renal: podocitopatía, glomerulopatía colapsante. Se inició tratamiento con corticoterapia, mejorando la función renal hasta suspender la hemodiálisis, pero presentó ascitis refractaria al tratamiento médico, por lo que se realizó paracentesis evacuatoria en reiteradas ocasiones. Se decidió colocación de catéter peritoneal tunelizado para el manejo de la ascitis refractaria. La ascitis fue disminuyendo progresivamente hasta el retiro del catéter peritoneal. Discusión y conclusión: el uso de catéter tunelizado de diálisis peritoneal es una opción de manejo efectiva en casos de síndrome nefrótico con ascitis refractaria.

Introduction: Refractory ascites can be a frequent complication in nephrotic syndrome (NS), there are reported cases of the use of a tunneled peritoneal dialysis catheter in patients with cirrhosis or abdominal neoplasms. The case of a patient with NS is presented in whom used a peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter to manage refractory ascites. Purpose: To show that the peritoneal catheter can be considered as an alternative for the management of refractory ascites in patients with nephrotic syndrome. Presentation of the case: A 19-year-old male patient, with no pathological history, presented progressive edema and impaired renal function. Nephrotic syndrome with anasarca was evidenced, and it evolved with worsening renal function, entering supportive hemodialysis. Renal biopsy was performed: podocytopathy, collapsing glomerulopathy. Corticosteroid treatment was started, improving renal function until hemodialysis was discontinued, but he presented ascites refractory to medical treatment, for which evacuatory paracentesis was performed repeatedly. It was decided to place a tunneled peritoneal catheter for the management of refractory ascites. Ascites gradually decreased until the peritoneal catheter was removed. Discussion and conclusion: The use of a tunneled peritoneal dialysis catheter is an effective management option in cases of nephrotic syndrome with refractory ascites.

Analysis of risk factors of modified midline catheter-related thrombosis and its countermeasures / 中国实用护理杂志

Objective:To analyze the risk factors of modified midline catheter-related thrombosis and propose countermeasures.Methods:Retrospective analysis was used to divide patients admitted to the neurology department of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from February 2018 to July 2020 into thrombotic group (9 cases) and nonthrombotic group (117 cases). Univariate analysis and binary Logistic regression were used to analyze the risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis.Results:The incidence of thrombosis was 7.14% (9/126) in patients with modified midline catheters. Univariate analysis showed that the occurrence of catheter-related thrombosis in patients was related to the primary type ( χ2 value was 6.331, P<0.05) and catheter pretreatment ( χ2 value was 4.016, P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the primary disease type and the catheter pretreatment method ( P>0.05). Conclusions:The incidence of thrombus in patients with encephalitis and pretreated catheter with normal saline is high, preventive care should be taken before the occurrence of thrombus, and thrombolytic therapy should be taken as soon as possible after the occurrence of thrombus.

Investigation of the best time for indwelling catheter of patients with chronic dacryocystitis after lacrimal drainage tube implantation / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

@#AIM: To investigate the best time for indwelling catheter of patients with chronic dacryocystitis after lacrimal drainage tube implantation.<p>METHODS: Totally 143 eyes of 143 patients with chronic dacryocystitis after lacrimal drainage tube implantation were selected in our hospital. They were divided into 3 groups including group A(50 eyes of 50 cases)with indwelling catheter in 9wk after tube implantation, group B(57 eyes of 57 cases)with indwelling catheter in 12wk after tube implantation, and group C(36 eyes of 36 cases)with indwelling catheter in 6wk after tube implantation. The clinical efficacy, visual acuity, incidence of epiphora, recurrence rate and incidence of postoperative complications with followed-up among three groups were compared.<p>RESULTS: On the day of extubation, the total effective rates of the three groups were 94%, 93% and 39%, the difference was statistically significant(<i>P</i><0.0167). The total effective rates of group A and group B were better than those of group C, and the difference was statistically significant(χ2=30.830, 32.056, <i>P</i><0.001). At 3mo after extubation, the total effective rates of the three groups were 56%, 51% and 36%, there was no significant difference(χ2=3.454, <i>P</i>=0.178). At 3mo after extubation, there was no significant difference in the visual acuity and the incidence of epiphora among the three groups(<i>P</i>>0.05). At 6mo after extubation, the recurrence rates of the three groups showed no significantly different(<i>P</i>=0.056). The incidence of postoperative complications in three groups were 4%(2/50), 7%(4/57)and 25%(9/36), the difference was statistically significant(χ2=11.048, <i>P</i>=0.004). The incidence of postoperative complications in group C was higher than that in groups A and B(χ2=6.499, 5.934; <i>P</i>=0.011, 0.015).<p>CONCLUSION: The clinical benefits of 6wk and 9wk after lacrimal drainage tube implantation are better than that of 12wk.

Comparative Study for the Efficacy of Small Bore Catheter in the Patients with Iatrogenic Pneumothorax

BACKGROUND: It has recently become most general to use the small bore catheter to perform closed thoracostomy in treating iatrogenic pneumothorax. This study was performed for analysis of the efficacy of treatment methods by using small bore catheter such as 7 F (French) central venous catheter, 10 F trocar catheter, 12 F pigtail catheter and for analysis of the appropriateness of each procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2007 to February 2010, Retrospective review of 105 patients with iatrogenic pneumothorax, who underwent closed thoracostomy by using small bore catheter, was performed. We analyzed the total success rate for all procedures as well as the individual success rate for each procedure, and analyzed the cause of failure, additional treatment method for failure, influential factors of treatment outcome, and complications. RESULTS: The most common causes of iatrogenic pneumothorax were presented as percutaneous needle aspiration(PCNA) in 48 cases (45.7%), and central venous catheterization in 26 cases (24.8%). The mean interval to thoracostomy after the procedure was measured as 5.2 hours (1~34 hours). Total success rate of thoracostomy was 78.1%. The success rate was not significantly difference by tube type, with 7 F central venous catheter as 80%, 10 F trocar catheter as 81.6%, and 12 F pigtail catheter as 71%. Twenty one out of 23 patients that had failed with small bore catheter treatment added large bore conventional thoracostomy, and another 2 patients received surgery. The causes for treatment failure were presented as continuous air leakage in 12 cases (52.2%) and tube malfunction in 7 cases (30%). The causes for failure did not present significant differences by tube type. Statistically significant factors affecting treatment performance were not discovered. CONCLUSION: Closed thoracostomy with small bore catheter proved to be effective for iatrogenic pneumothorax. The success rate was not difference for each type. However, it is important to select the appropriate catheter by considering the patient status, pneumothorax aspect, and medical personnel in the cardiothoracic surgery department of the relevant hospital.

Comparison of technical survival between Tenckhoff double-cuffed straight catheter and swan-neck curled tip catheter in peritoneal dialysis / 中华肾脏病杂志

objective To compare the technical survival between Tenckhoff double-cuffed straight catheter (TC)and swan-neck curled tip catheter (SNC) in peritoneal dialysis (PD). Methods Clinical data of 208 patients received PD in the Peritoneal Dialysis Center of Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 1999 to December 2007 were analyzed retrospectively. All the patients were divided into two groups according to indwelling catheter. Technical survival and complications associated with the catheter between two groups were compared. Results Demographics and basic information were similar in both groups. The exit-site infection (ESI) rates of TC and SNC were 22.1% and 19.8% (P=0.786), and peritonitis rates of TC and SNC were 31.1% and 22.1% (P=0.159), which were slightly lower in SNC group, but the difference was not significant. Removal of the catheter was found in 27 (13.0%)patients, including 17 cases in TC group (13.9%) and 10 cases in SNC group (11.6%)(P=0.680).The median survival times of catheter in TC group and SNC group were 25 months and 22 months respectively without significant difference (P=0.103). Conclusions There are no significant differences of ESI rate, peritonitis rate and catheter survival between these two catheters in PD. The expensive swan-neck catheter offers no additional advantage. Doctors should choose the catheter according to the economic status of patients.

Venous thrombosis around internal jugular venous indwelling catheter in hemodialysis patients / 中华肾脏病杂志

Objective To investigate the prevalence, characteristics and risk factors of superior vena cava and auxiliary branchs thrombosis in hemodialysis patients with internal jugular venous indwelling catheter. Methods A total of 43 cases on hemodialysis (HD) with indwelling short-term catheter in internal jugular vein from June to December in 2007 were enrolled in this study. The clinical data and biochemical indicators were collected to investigate the prevalence, characteristics and risk factors of venous thrombosis around indwelling catheter, such as, superior vena cava and auxiliary branehs in these patients. Results Short-term double Iumen internal jugular venous catheter were placed in 43 HD patients. Different degrees of central vein thrombosis were found in 21 of the 43 HD patients (48.8%). The ratio of thrombosis in jugular vein, brachiocephalic vein, subclavical vein and uperior vena cava was 100% (21/21), 28.6% (6/21), 23.8%(5/21) and 19.0%(4/21), respectively. Ten of the 21 HD patients (47.6%) with central vein thrombosis presented clinical symptoms. Five cases developed edema of the upper extremity, 2 cases had new-onset symptom's pulmonary embolism, and 3 eases developed blood overflowed from inlet port of circum-catheter. The ratio of diabetes mellitus, malignant tumor, the prevalence of increased level of serum lipoprotein a and plasma homocysteic acid were significantly higher in the HD patients with central vein thrombosis than that in those without central vein thrombosis. The odds ratio of diabetes mellitus, malignant tumor, high serum lipoprotein a and high plasma homocysteic acid was 5.758, 4.750, 6.967 and 8.533, respectively. Conclusions The prevalence of central vein thrombosis in HD patients with short-term indwelling catheter in internal jugular vein is quite high. Its clinical symptom is insidious but dangerous. Diabetes mellitus, malignant tumor, high serum lipoprotein a and high plasma homocysteic acid may be the important risk factors of central vein thrombosis in above HD patients.

Comparative Study of Bacterial Isolation and Antibiotic Sensitivity Test of Urine and Catheter-tip Culture in Long-term Catheter Indwelling Patients / 대한비뇨기과학회지

Urinary tract infections constitute a large clinical problems that particularly affect catheter indwelling patients, causing morbidity and mortality. To investigate 1) the rate of infection by duration of catheter indwelling in patients of several kinds of disease, 2) the kinds of colonized bacteria and the similarity or difference of the bacterial species cultured in the urine and catheter of same patient, and 3) the comparison of sensitivity to antibiotics of cultured bacteria of both material, bacterial culture and antibiotic sensitivity test were done from urine and proximal tip of catheters in 31 catheter indwelling patients who had been administered, sometimes intermittently, various antibiotics. The rate of bacterial infection increased markedly with the lengthening of catheter indwelling period in urine and catheter cultures, 22.2% and 33.3% at 1 week, both 50% at 2-3 weeks, 78.6% and 85.7% at 4 weeks respectively The results of bacterial culture from both material were same in 27 (87.1%) patients. The gram negative bacteria composed of 41 (89.1%) species in cultured bacteria. The three frequent species were 16 (34.8%) Escherichia coli, 9 (19.6%) Klebsiella pneumonia, and 6 (13.0%) Morganella morgagni. The overall sensitivity of urine cultured bacteria to tested antibiotics showed minor difference from that of catheter, susceptible in 70.4%, and 73.8%, resistant in 28. 6%, and 24.6%, respectively. Almost all of the patients indwelling catheter longer than 4 weeks had bacterial infection or colonization in urine and proximal catheter-tip in spite of preventive administration of antibiotics. The urine culture only may be enough instead of culturing both the urine and proximal catheter-tip in long-term catheterized patients. Routine antibacterial drug administration should be taken into consideration not to be overused in long-term catheter indwelling patients.