RÉSUMÉ
Introducción. La hidatidosis biliar es la complicación más frecuente de la hidatidosis hepática. La colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica desempeña un papel clave en el tratamiento. Caso clínico. Femenina de 57 años acude por dolor abdominal, vómito, diarrea, leucocitosis, hiperbilirrubinemia, en colangioresonancia magnética presenta vía biliar dilatada, defecto de señal en tercio proximal y distal. La colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica evidencia presencia de cuerpo extraño de aspecto de membranas, vía biliar dilatada, se extrae quistes de aspecto parasitario. Conclusión. El tratamiento de elección es quirúrgico y farmacológico, la colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica antes de la cirugía, asegura la extracción del material hidatídico y trata la obstrucción biliar, identifica el trayecto fistuloso y facilita su cierre mediante colocación de prótesis y esfinterotomía, por lo que constituye un tratamiento no quirúrgico efectivo y con margen amplio de seguridad.
Introduction: Biliary hydatid disease is the most common complication of hepatic hydatid disease. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plays a key role in treatment. Clinical case: A 57-year-old female presented with abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, leukocytosis, mixed hyperbilirubinemia, and magnetic resonance cholangiography showed a dilated bile duct and a signal defect in the proximal and distal third. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography shows the presence of a foreign body with a membrane appearance, a dilated bile duct, and cysts with a parasitic appearance. Conclusion: The treatment of choice is surgical and pharmacological, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before surgery ensures the extraction of hydatid material and treats biliary obstruction, identifies the fistulous tract and facilitates its closure by placing a prosthesis and sphincterotomy, which is why it constitutes a Effective non-surgical treatment with a wide margin of safety.
Sujet(s)
Humains , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Conduits biliaires/parasitologie , Angiocholite , Cholangiopancréatographie rétrograde endoscopique , Tube digestif/imagerie diagnostique , Échinococcose , Endoscopie , Chirurgie générale , Conduits biliaires , Échinococcose hépatique , Équateur , Sphinctérotomie , Hyperbilirubinémie , HyperleucocytoseRÉSUMÉ
RESUMEN Objetivos: El acceso biliar refractario a las técnicas convencionales de canulación es un escenario clínico desafiante para la mayoría de endoscopistas, la técnica de rendezvous endoscópico-percutáneo es una óptima alternativa con altas tasas de éxito y bajas tasas de complicaciones en manos expertas, sin embargo, su uso rutinario en Occidente principalmente Latinoamérica es aún limitado. El objetivo de nuestro estudio fue evaluar la factibilidad, eficacia y seguridad del rendezvous endoscópico-percutáneo en el manejo de la vía biliar difícil en un centro endoscópico en Perú. Materiales y métodos: Estudio descriptivo - tipo serie de casos que incluyó 21 pacientes, con diagnóstico de vía biliar difícil, todos tratados mediante rendezvous endoscópico-percutáneo entre Julio 2017 a Julio 2020. Se evaluó: edad, género, número de colangiopancreatografias retrógradas endoscópicas fallidas previas, hallazgos endoscópicos asociados, tasa de canulación exitosa, tasa de resolución exitosa de coledocolitiasis difícil, eventos adversos y mortalidad relacionada con el procedimiento. Resultados: La tasa de canulación exitosa fue del 100% (21/21). Se presentaron 12 casos (57,1%) de coledocolitiasis difícil de los cuales se obtuvo una tasa de resolución exitosa del 91,6% (11/12). La tasa global de eventos adversos fue de 4,7% (1/21), la cual fue un caso de hemorragia digestiva post-esfinteroplastía que fue resuelta exitosamente solo por vía endoscópica. Conclusiones: El rendezvous endoscópico-percutáneo realizado por manos expertas es factible, seguro y clínicamente efectivo para el manejo de la vía biliar difícil en Latinoamérica.
ABSTRACT Objectives: Biliary access refractory to conventional cannulation techniques is a challenging clinical scenario for most endoscopists. The endoscopic-percutaneous rendezvous technique is an optimal alternative with high success rates and low complication rates in expert hands, however its routine use in the West, mainly in Latin America, is still limited. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of endoscopic-percutaneous rendezvous in the management of difficult biliary tract in an endoscopic center in Peru. Materials and methods: Descriptive study - case series type that included 21 patients, with diagnosis of difficult bile duct, all treated by endoscopic-percutaneous rendezvous between July 2017 to July 2020. We evaluated: age, gender, number of previous failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, associated endoscopic findings, rate of successful cannulation, rate of successful resolution of difficult choledocholithiasis, adverse events and procedure-related mortality. Results: The rate of successful cannulation was 100% (21/21). There were 12 cases (57.1%) of difficult choledocholithiasis of which there was a successful resolution rate of 91.6% (11/12). The overall adverse event rate was 4.7% (1/21), which was one case of post-sphincteroplasty gastrointestinal bleeding that was successfully resolved endoscopically only. Conclusions: Endoscopic-percutaneous rendezvous performed by expert hands is feasible, safe and clinically effective for the management of the difficult bile duct in Latin America.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To juxtapose laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with common bile duct exploration and stone extraction (LC+ LCBDE) against endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography/sphincterotomy with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC+ ERCP/EST) in the therapeutic context of acute biliary pancreatitis.Methods:The clinical data of patients with acute biliary pancreatitis in Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Datong Third People's Hospital from January 2017 to January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 44 patients were inrolled, including 23 males and 21 females, with the age of (60.6±11.7) years. Based on different treatment approaches, the patients were divided into the LC+ LCBDE group ( n=33) and the LC+ ERCP group ( n=11, LC+ ERCP/EST). Total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), blood amylase, operation time, postoperative hospitalization stays, total hospitalization cost, postoperative anal exhaust time, and postoperative complications (bile leakage, fever, bleeding) were compared between the two groups. Results:There were no significant differences in preoperative total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, ALT, AST, and blood amylase between LC+ ERCP group and LC+ LCBDE groups (all P>0.05). In LC+ LCBDE group, operation time was 110.0 (96.3, 147.5) min, postoperative hospitalization time was 9.0 (7.5, 11.0) d, postoperative exhaust time was 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) d, and in LC+ LCBDE group, operation time was 60.0 (32.0, 65.0) min, postoperative hospitalization time was 7.0 (4.0, 8.0) d, postoperative exhaust time was 1.0 (1.0, 1.0) d. Comparisons with LC+ LCBDE group, LC+ ERCP group had shorter postoperative hospitalization stay and earlier postoperative exhaust time, the total hospitalization cost of LC+ LCBDE group was 23 829.3 (21 779.6, 27 221.9) yuan, which was higher than 36 894.8 (31 963.5, 41 172.2) yuan in LC+ ERCP group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). Comparison of postoperative total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, ALT and AST between LC+ ERCP group and LC+ LCBDE group, with no significant difference(all P>0.05). No postoperative complications such as bile leakage, residual stones, fever and bleeding occurred in both groups. Conclusion:Compared with LC+ ERCP/EST, LC+ LCBDE in the treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis, although the operation time and hospital stay are longer, but the total hospitalization cost is less, there is no need for multiple operations, and it can be used as the first choice for acute biliary pancreatitis.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To investigate the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM).Methods:Data of 40 pediatric patients under 14 with PBM diagnosed and treated by ERCP at Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School from November 2012 to September 2022 were collected. PBM types, ERCP-related diagnosis and treatment, adverse events and prognosis were retrospectively analyzed.Results:Nineteen cases were P-B type (joining of common bile duct with pancreatic duct), 17 were B-P type (joining of pancreatic duct with common bile duct), and 4 were complex type. Forty children with PBM underwent 50 ERCP-related operations, among which 48 procedures succeeded. One case failed during cannulation of ERCP, replaced by rendezvous-assisted endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (RV-ERP) afterwards. There were no serious postoperative adverse events such as bleeding, perforation or death. Thirty-four patients (85%) were followed up successfully, among which 14 underwent further surgery and 20 continued conservative treatment.Conclusion:ERCP is the golden standard to diagnose pediatric PBM, and it is also safe and effective treatment for PBM.
RÉSUMÉ
There are various etiologies for extrahepatic bile duct stenosis， and pharmacotherapy and endoscopic intervention can achieve a good clinical effect in benign stenosis. Early diagnosis and timely surgical treatment of malignant stenosis may prolong the survival time of patients. However， there are still difficulties in the differential diagnosis of malignant bile duct stenosis. This article reviews the application of serology， radiology， endoscopic techniques， and artificial intelligence in the differential diagnosis of malignant bile duct stenosis， so as to provide strategies and references for formulating clinical diagnosis and treatment regimens.
RÉSUMÉ
ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography （ERCP） combined with electrohydraulic lithotripsy under the direct view of eyeMax biliary-pancreatic imaging system in the treatment of difficult choledocholithiasis. MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 12 patients with difficult choledocholithiasis who underwent ERCP and electrohydraulic lithotripsy under the direct view of eyeMax biliary-pancreatic imaging system in Department of Gastroenterology， Jilin People’s Hospital， from May to November 2022. The clinical effect of lithotripsy and lithotomy was observed， and postoperative complications and time of surgical operation were assessed. ResultsAmong the 12 patients， 11 （91.67%） were successfully treated by electrohydraulic lithotripsy under direct view， 9 （75.00%） achieved first-attempt success in lithotripsy， and 11 （91.67%） had complete removal of calculi； 1 patient was found to have stenosis of the bile ducts caused by multiple biliary tract surgeries， and grade Ⅱ intrahepatic bile duct stones above the sites of stenosis were removed under direct view， but there were still residues of grade Ⅲ intrahepatic bile duct stones， which led to the fact that complete calculus removal was not achieved. The mean time of ERCP operation was 91.3±26.2 minutes， including a time of 41.8±22.2 minutes for energy lithotripsy. There were 2 cases of postoperative biliary tract infection which were improved after anti-infective therapy， 2 cases of hyperamylasemia which were not given special treatment， and 3 cases of mild pancreatitis which were improved after symptomatic medication， and there were no complications such as bleeding and perforation. ConclusionERCP combined with electrohydraulic lithotripsy under the direct view of eyeMax biliary-pancreatic imaging system is safe， effective， and feasible in the treatment of difficult choledocholithiasis.
RÉSUMÉ
La Sociedad Europea de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal (ESGE) define "canulación difícil" como aquella en la que se realizan más de 5 intentos, se exceden 5 minutos, o se produce canulación inadvertida del conducto pancreático 2 o más veces (criterios 5-5-2), recomendando estos puntos de corte para realizar técnicas avanzadas de canulación y disminuir la tasa de eventos adversos post CPRE. Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar el rendimiento de los criterios 5-5-2 y su asociación con complicaciones post CPRE en un hospital de referencia de Perú. Realizamos un estudio analítico prospectivo de casos y controles en el que se incluyó 120 pacientes a los que se realizó CPRE. El grupo casos estuvo formado por 30 pacientes que cumplieron al menos uno de los criterios 5-5-2 y el grupo controles por 90 pacientes sin ninguno de estos criterios. Se comparó el desarrollo de complicaciones en cada grupo y su asociación con cada uno de los criterios 5-5-2. Las complicaciones presentadas fueron: pancreatitis post CPRE (6,6% en el grupo casos vs 3,3% en el grupo controles), sangrado (3,3% controles vs 0% casos) y perforación (1,1% controles vs 0 % casos); sin observar diferencia estadísticamente significativa. El criterio de 2 o más ingresos inadvertidos al conducto pancreático presentó asociación significativa (OR= 10,29, IC: 1,47-71,98; p= 0,005) con el desarrollo de pancreatitis post CPRE. Los criterios 5 minutos y 5 intentos no se asociaron a complicaciones post CPRE. En conclusión, el más relevante de los criterios 5-5-2 fue el ingreso inadvertido al conducto pancreático en 2 o más ocasiones, mostrando asociación por sí solo con pancreatitis post CPRE. Los criterios tiempo y número de intentos podrían ampliarse con cautela sin aumentar la tasa de complicaciones post CPRE.
The European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) defines "difficult biliary cannulation" by the presence of one or more of the following: more than 5 contacts with the papilla, more than 5 minutes attempting to cannulate, or inadvertent cannulation of the pancreatic duct in 2 or more times (5-5-2 criteria), recommending these cut-off points to perform advanced cannulation techniques in order to reduce the rate of post-ERCP adverse events. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of the 5-5-2 criteria and their association with post-ERCP complications in a reference hospital in Peru. We performed a prospective analytical case-control study and 120 patients who underwent ERCP were enrolled. The case group included 30 patients who met at least one of the 5-5-2 criteria and the control group included 90 patients without any of these criteria. The ERCP- related complications in both groups and their association with each of the 5-5-2 criteria were compared. The ERCP-related complications that occurred were post-ERCP pancreatitis (6.6% in the case group vs. 3.3% in the control group), bleeding (3.3% controls vs. 0% cases) and perforation (1.1% controls vs. 0% cases); no statistically significant differences were observed. The criterion of 2 or more unintended cannulations to the pancreatic duct showed a significant association (OR= 10.29, CI: 1.47-71.98; p= 0.005) with the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis. The criteria 5 minutes and 5 attempts were not associated with post-ERCP complications. In conclusion, among 5-5-2 criteria only the unintended cannulation of 2 or more times into the pancreatic duct was associated with an increased risk of post-ERC pancreatitis. The time and number of attempts criteria could be cautiously expanded without increasing the rate of post-ERCP complications.
RÉSUMÉ
La disfunción del esfínter de Oddi (DEO) es una patología poco frecuente que debe ser considerada en el diagnóstico diferencial de pacientes con episodios de dolor biliar o pancreatitis aguda recurrente y antecedente de colecistectomía. Generalmente son pacientes con múltiples consultas, en los cuales la patología ha afectado considerablemente su calidad de vida. El diagnóstico se sustenta en la clínica, los marcadores serológicos y los medios diagnósticos de soporte, que se solicitan según el componente esfinteriano sospechado. El tratamiento con mayor eficacia es la esfinterotomía endoscópica. El uso de prótesis es aceptado, pero discutido. Se presenta el caso de un paciente masculino en la cuarta década de la vida que consultó por múltiples episodios de pancreatitis aguda recurrente con estudios de etiología que sospecharon disfunción del esfínter de Oddi pancreático y quien fue llevado a manejo endoscópico, con mejoría de su cuadro clínico.
Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction (SOD) is a rare pathology that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with biliary pain episodes or recurrent acute pancreatitis and a background of cholecystectomy. Generally, these are patients with multiple consultations where this pathology has considerably affected their quality of life. Diagnosis is based on clinical findings, serological markers and supporting diagnostic tests requested according to the suspected sphincteric component. The most effective treatment is endoscopic sphincterotomy. The use of prosthesis is accepted but debated. We present the case of a male patient in his forties who consulted for multiple episodes of recurrent acute pancreatitis with etiology studies suspecting dysfunction of the pancreatic sphincter of Oddi and who was taken to endoscopic management with improvement of his clinical picture.
RÉSUMÉ
Iatrogenic bile duct injury (IBDI) refers to bile duct injury accidentally caused by medical factors such as surgical operation or other invasive operations during treatment. With the gradual maturity of surgical operation and minimally invasive techniques, the treatment of bile duct injury now includes endoscopic treatment, bile duct jejunum Roux-en-Y anastomosis, bile duct end-to-end anastomosis, hepatectomy, and liver transplantation. For IBDI, the selection of reasonable and effective treatment methods is currently an important and difficult issue in biliary surgery. Through a systematic review of the literature on the treatment of IBDI, this article analyzes and summarizes the different treatment modalities for IBDI.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective To investigate whether endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) can be an alternative method for diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) by comparing the ability of EUS versus CT and transabdominal ultrasonography (TUS) in the diagnosis of muddy stones of the common bile duct. Methods A prospective study was conducted for 53 patients suspected of muddy stones of the common bile duct who attended Nanxishan Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region from July 2019 to December 2021, and all patients underwent EUS, TUS, and CT before ERCP. With ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) for removing muddy stones of the common bile duct as the gold standard for the diagnosis of muddy stones of the common bile duct, EUS, TUS, and CT were compared in terms of their ability to display the muddy stones of the common bile duct. The chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups. Results In the 53 patients, EUS, TUS, and CT had a positive rate of 88.68%, 50.94%, and 62.26%, respectively, in detecting muddy stones of the common bile duct. As for the positive results confirmed by EST under ERCP, EUS had a sensitivity of 93.75%, a specificity of 60.00%, and an accuracy of 90.57% in detecting muddy stones of the common bile duct, while TUS had a sensitivity of 56.25%, a specificity of 100.00%, and an accuracy of 60.38% and CT had a sensitivity of 66.67%, a specificity of 80.00%, and an accuracy of 67.92%. There was a significant difference between EUS and CT in the accuracy in detecting muddy stones of the common bile duct ( χ 2 =8.26, P =0.004), and there was also a significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between EUS and TUS ( χ 2 =13.05, P < 0.001). Conclusion EUS is more accurate than TUS and CT in the diagnosis of muddy stones of the common bile duct, and instead of ERCP, EUS is thus recommended for suspected muddy stones of the common bile duct when TUS and CT fail to identify the lesions in clinical practice, so as to make a confirmed diagnosis and reduce related costs and complications.
RÉSUMÉ
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography （ERCP） during pregnancy and puerperium through a comparative analysis. MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 22 patients in pregnancy and 39 patients in puerperium who received ERCP in Digestive Endoscopy Center of The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from January 2007 to August 2022. The two groups of patients were compared in terms of baseline data， diagnosis during ERCP， interventions， laboratory results before and after ERCP， post-ERCP complications， and delivery and fetal outcomes. The independent-samples t test was used for comparison of continuous data between two groups， and the chi-square test or the Fisher’s exact test was used for comparison of categorical data between two groups. ResultsThere were no significant differences between the patients in pregnancy and those in puerperium in all baseline data （all P>0.05） except the rate of CT examination （22.73% vs 58.97%， χ2=7.44， P=0.006）. During the ERCP procedure， compared with the patients in puerperium， the patients in pregnancy had a significantly lower proportion of the patients who underwent biliary stone extraction or endoscopic papillary balloon dilation （χ2=4.007 and 4.315， both P<0.05） and a significantly higher proportion of the patients who did not receive X-ray fluoroscopy （χ2=12.103， P=0.001）. After ERCP， both groups had significant improvements in white blood cell count， total bilirubin， direct bilirubin， alanine aminotransferase， and aspartate aminotransferase （all P<0.05）. The overall incidence rate of post-ERCP complications was 7.04% （5/71） for all patients， with post-ERCP biliary infection as the most common complication （3/71，4.23%）， and there was no significant difference in the incidence rate of post-ERCP complications between the two groups （P>0.05）. As for delivery and fetal outcomes， compared with the patients in puerperium， the patients in pregnancy had a significantly higher proportion of patients with early termination of pregnancy （50.00% vs 0，χ2=20.528， P<0.001） and a significantly lower proportion of patients with cesarean section （36.36% vs 76.92%， χ2=4.756， P=0.029）. There were no significant differences in the incidence rates of adverse events such as abnormal fetal development and stillbirth between the two groups （P>0.05）. ConclusionWith strict control of ERCP indications and timing， ERCP is effective and relatively safe in both pregnancy and puerperium and has a comparable incidence rate of post-ERCP complications to that in the general population， with relatively good delivery and fetal outcomes.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To explore the long-term effect of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of unresectable ampullary carcinoma.Methods:Clinical data of patients with ampullary carcinoma who received endoscopic radiofrequency ablation in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University from January 2012 to May 2019 were retrospectively collected, including basic information, frequency of radiofrequency ablation, the type of biliary stent, postoperative complications, and follow-up. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the survival of patients after endoscopic radiofrequency ablation. Relationship between frequency of radiofrequency ablation, type of biliary stent and overall survival time was analyzed.Results:A total of 50 patients were enrolled, including 31 males and 19 females, aged 73.0±9.7 years. Twenty-five patients (50.0%) underwent 1 radiofrequency ablation treatment, while 25 patients (50.0%) underwent radiofrequency ablation treatments more than twice. Postoperative complications occurred in 6 patients (12.0%), all of which were mild symptoms. The average follow-up was 22.3 months, with a total of 39 (78.0%) deaths, 5 (10.0%) lost to follow-up, and 6 (12.0%) surviving. The median overall survival time was 16.9 (95% CI: 9.1-24.8) months, with cumulative survival rates of 62.0%, 38.5%, 27.0%, and 12.6% at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The median overall survival time of those treated with radiofrequency ablation ≥2 times showed a trend of prolongation compared to patients treated once, but the difference was not statistically significant [26.7 (95% CI: 9.7-43.7) months VS 12.6 (95% CI: 4.9-20.3) months, χ2=3.049, P=0.081]. Plastic stents were used in 32 patients (64.0%) and metal stents in 18 patients (36.0%). There was no significant difference in median overall survival time between patients using metal and plastic stents [17.1 (95% CI: 6.1-28.0) months VS 15.9 (95% CI: 6.9-24.9) months， χ2=0.029， P=0.865]. Conclusion:Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation is a safe treatment for unresectable ampullary carcinoma, and multiple consecutive treatments may increase the survival benefit.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To evaluate the value of endoclip-assisted and submucosal injection-assisted cannulation techniques for difficult cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).Methods:Data of 12 458 patients treated with ERCP for the first time in the First Affilated Hospital of Naval Medical University from June 2015 to September 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty eight (0.22%) were identified as difficult cannulation where metal clip- or submucosal injection-assisted cannulation was used. The selective cannulation success rate, intubation time and complication incidence of the two techniques in difficult cannulation patients were analyzed.Results:Difficult cannulation was performed in 18 males (64.3%) and 10 females (35.7%) with an age of 69.6±14.1 years assisted by metal clips or submucosal injection. Five cases (17.9%) were type Ⅱ, 5 cases (17.9%) type Ⅲ, and 18 cases (64.3%) type Ⅴ according to papilla classification. Sixteen patients (57.1%) received metal clip-assisted cannulation, and 12 cases (42.9%) submucosal injection-assisted cannulation. Twenty-five (89.3%) patients successfully underwent selective cannulation with the cannulation time of 9.9±4.3 min. One case (3.6%) of mild post-ERCP pancreatitis and 3 cases (10.7%) of post-ERCP hyperamylasemia occurred. No postoperative bleeding or perforation occurred. All patients were cured and discharged after conservative treatment.Conclusion:When selective cannulation is difficult due to poor papilla exposure or deflection, endoclip- or submucosal injection-assisted cannulation can effectively improve the successful selective cannulation rate during ERCP with low complication incidence, which is worth of clinical promotion.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of digital cholangioscopy-assisted non-radiation endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for common bile duct stones.Methods:Clinical data of patients who underwent digital cholangioscopy-assisted non-radiation ERCP for common bile duct stones from May 2019 to September 2021 were reviewed. The baseline data, the success rate of cannulation, the one-time success rate of endoscopic stone removal, the operation time, total hospital stay, complications, and recurrence of bile duct stones were analyzed.Results:A total of 170 patients were included, and bile duct stones were detected in 156 (91.8%) patients with the long diameter of 7.7±4.1 mm under preoperative imaging examination. Bile duct stones were detected under choledochoscopy and were successfully removed by using digital cholangioscopy through non-radiation ERCP. The success rate of cannulation was 100.0% (170/170) . The one-time success rate of endoscopic stone removal was 96.5% (164/170), and 6 patients (3.5%) received secondary stone removal for large stones (long diameter>30 mm).The time of biliary exploration and whole non-radiation ERCP were 9.6±2.7 min (6-24 min) and 35.9±17.3 min (13-85 min), respectively. The total hospital stay was 6.3±2.2 days (5-10 days). Postoperative pancreatitis occurred in 3 patients (1.8%), all of whom were mild and resolved after symptomatic treatment. No recurrence of bile duct stones was seen in any patient over 1-month postoperative follow-up.Conclusion:Digital cholangioscopy-assisted non-radiation ERCP is safe and effective for common bile duct stones without ray exposure, which is worth of promotion.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of stone extraction with a single peroral choledochoscopy system under direct visualization and conventional X-ray endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for non-difficult common bile duct stones.Methods:A total of 164 patients with common bile duct stones who underwent stone extraction by using the single peroral choledochoscopy system under direct visualization (the observation group, n=82) and conventional X-ray endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (the control group, n=82) from January 2018 to April 2022 in Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine were enrolled. The observation group was directly selected from the database, while the control group was randomly matched by age stratification with baseline data validated. The success rates of intubation, stone removal, postoperative complication incidence, and radiation exposure between the two groups were compared. Results:There was no significant difference between the baseline data of the observation group and the control group ( P>0.05). The number of patients with detected stones≥2 in the observation group and the control group were 59 (71.95%) and 37 (45.12%) respectively with significant difference ( χ 2=12.16, P=0.001). The success rates of bile duct intubation in the observation group and the control group were both 100.00% (82/82). The success rates of stone extraction were 98.78% (81/82) and 100.00% (82/82) respectively with no significant difference ( P>0.05). The one-time stone removal rates of the two groups were 93.90% (77/82) and 92.68% (76/82) respectively with no significant difference ( χ2=0.10, P=0.755). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the observation group and the control group ( P>0.05). The amount of intraoperative ray exposure volume in the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group [10.20 (6.69, 18.94) mGy VS 15.41 (10.70, 22.77) mGy, U=2 462.00, P=0.003]. Conclusion:The efficacy and safety of stone extraction with single peroral choledochoscopy system under direct visualization are comparable to those of traditional X-ray ERCP for non-difficult common bile duct stones, but it can significantly reduce the intraoperative ray exposure volume during therapeutic ERCP stone extraction.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To investigate the clinical value of three-dimensional (3D) visualization technology in the precise drainage through endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD) for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.Methods:Clinical data of 42 patients with highly suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent ERBD in Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital from September 2019 to August 2022 were retrospectively collected. Twenty patients underwent 3D biliary tract reconstruction before surgery (the reconstruction group) and 22 others did not undergo 3D biliary tract reconstruction before surgery (the non-reconstruction group). The surgery time, X-ray exposure time, the technical success rate, the clinical success rate, incidence of postoperative complications, recent and short-term endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) reintervention rate of the two groups were compared.Results:There was no significant difference in preoperative baseline data between the two groups ( P>0.05). ERBD was conducted successfully in all 42 patients. The operation time in the reconstruction group [35.00 (25.00, 57.50) min] was significantly shorter than that in the non-reconstruction group [60.00 (33.75, 60.00) min] with significant difference ( Z=-2.251, P=0.024). There was no significant difference in the X-ray exposure time between the two groups [10.00 (5.00, 12.00) min VS 10.55 (9.50, 17.50) min, Z=-1.552, P=0.121]. The technical success rates of both groups were 100.0%, and the clinical success rate of the reconstruction group was higher than that of the non-reconstruction group [70.0% (14/20) VS 31.8% (7/22)] with significant difference ( χ 2=6.109, P=0.013). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups [20.0% (4/20) VS 22.7% (5/22), χ 2=0.141, P=0.708]. All patients were followed up for 6 months after the procedure. The median survival time was 3.91 months in the reconstruction group and 2.78 months in the non-reconstruction group. There was no ERCP intervention in the reconstruction group within 2 weeks after the procedure, while 4 cases (18.2%) in the non-reconstruction group received 6 ERCP interventions due to cholangitis and postoperative pancreatitis. Within 2 weeks to 3 months, 2 patients (10.0%) in the reconstruction group received 4 ERCP interventions for cholangitis, and 2 patients (9.1%) in the non-reconstruction group received 3 ERCP interventions for cholangitis. There was no significant difference in recent ( χ 2=2.183, P=0.140) or short-term ( χ 2=0.000, P=1.000) ERCP reintervention rate between the reconstruction group and the non-reconstruction group. Conclusion:3D visualization biliary duct reconstruction technology can measure the volume of liver drainage for hilar cholangiocarcinoma, shorten the operation time and improve the clinical success rate through precise preoperative planning, which is worth of promotion.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic stenting drainage for patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction caused by unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.Methods:Data of 106 patients with malignant hilar obstruction caused by unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma who received endoscopic stenting drainage in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University from January 2012 to January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different stent types, they were divided into the metal stent group (30 cases) and the plastic stent group (76 cases). The observation indexes included clinical success rate, complication incidence, stent patency and overall survival time. The independent predictors for stent patency and overall survival of patients were analyzed by multivariate Cox regression model.Results:The overall clinical success rate was 67.9% (72/106) and the incidence of postoperative cholangitis was 29.2% (31/106). The clinical success rates were 93.3% (28/30) and 57.9% (44/76) ( χ2=12.40, P<0.001), and the incidences of postoperative cholangitis were 13.3% (4/30) and 35.5% (27/76) ( χ2=5.12, P=0.024) in the metal stent group and the plastic stent group, respectively. The median stent patency was 5.2 (95% CI:3.7-6.0) months, and the overall survival time was 3.0 (95% CI:2.5-3.7) months. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that hepatic drainage volume <30% was an independent predictor for stent patency ( HR=2.12, 95% CI:1.01-4.46, P=0.048). Bismuth type Ⅳ ( HR=2.06, 95% CI:1.12-3.77, P=0.020), Child-Pugh class C ( HR=4.09, 95% CI: 2.00-8.39, P<0.001) and plastic stent ( HR=1.87, 95% CI:1.21-2.90, P=0.005) were independent predictors for overall survival time. Conclusion:Hepatocellular carcinoma involving the hilar bile duct has a poor prognosis. Compared with plastic stents, metal stents show advantages in clinical success rate and incidence of postoperative cholangitis. Hepatic drainage volume <30% is an independent predictor for stent patency, and Bismuth type Ⅳ, Child-Pugh class C and plastic stent are independent predictors for overall survival time.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To investigate the efficacy of endoscopic stent placement for patients with Bismuth type Ⅳ hilar cholangiocarcinoma.Methods:Data of 229 patients with unresectable Bismuth type Ⅳ hilar cholangiocarcinoma who successfully underwent endoscopic stent placement at the Department of Endoscopy, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University from January 2002 to January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Outcomes included clinical success rate, complication incidence, stent patency period and overall survival time. The patency of stents and overall survival time of patients were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. The independent predictors for stent patency and overall survival of patients were analyzed by a multivariate Cox proportional regression model.Results:The overall clinical success rate was 78.2% (179/229). The incidence of early cholangitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was 20.5% (47/229). The median stent patency and overall survival time were 5.7 (95% CI: 4.8-6.7) months and 5.1 (95% CI: 4.2-6.0) months, respectively. Further multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that metal stent ( P<0.001, HR=0.452, 95% CI: 0.307-0.666) and bilateral stents with bilateral angiography ( P=0.036, HR=0.644, 95% CI: 0.427-0.971) were independent predictors of stent patency; total bilirubin>200 μmol/L ( P=0.001, HR=1.627, 95% CI: 1.208-2.192), metal stent ( P=0.004, HR=0.636, 95% CI: 0.467-0.866) and antitumor therapy ( P<0.001, HR=0.439, 95% CI:0.308-0.626) were independent predictors of overall survival. Conclusion:There is high incidence of cholangitis in patients with unresectable Bismuth type Ⅳ hilar cholangiocarcinoma treated with endoscopic stenting. Longer stent patency can be achieved with metal stent placement and bilateral drainage. In addition, metal stent for drainage and antitumor therapy can also help increase the survival benefit.
RÉSUMÉ
To evaluate the safety and clinical effectiveness of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with biliary and pancreatic duct stenting combined with enucleation (En) for cystadenoma in pancreatic head, clinical data of patients with cystadenoma in pancreatic head treated by ERCP+En (ERCP+En group, n=11) or En (En group, n=12) at Hangzhou First People's Hospital from January 2020 to January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The general information, intraoperative condition, perioperative complications, hospital stay, and follow-up outcomes were compared between the two groups. No noteworthy difference in general information was observed between the two groups ( P>0.05). In the ERCP+En group, ERCP was successfully implanted into the biliary pancreatic duct stent, and hyperamylasemia occurred in 3 cases after ERCP, which improved after conservative treatment. No conversion to laparotomy or blood transfusion occurred during the En operation, and no serious complication occurred after EN operation in the two groups. There was 0 case and 3 cases of grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula in the ERCP+En group and the En group, respectively ( P=0.001). The median hospital stay was 11 days and 15 days, respectively, with statistical significance ( U=2.25, P=0.031). No noteworthy difference in median En time (145 min VS 155 min, U=0.03, P=0.952) or intraoperative blood loss (100 mL VS 120 mL, U=0.05, P=0.784) was observed between the two groups. During a median follow-up of 18 months, no recurrence happened in either group, and the ERCP+En group did not experience biliary pancreatic duct stenosis, while the En group experienced 2 pancreatic duct stenosis and 1 biliary duct stenosis. Endoscopic biliary and pancreatic duct stenting combined with En is an effective way to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula and avoid long-term complications such as biliary and pancreatic duct stenosis for cystadenoma in pancreatic head.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic biliary drainage for biliary fistula.Methods:Data of consecutive 409 biliary fistula patients who were treated and diagnosed at the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from November 2002 to November 2022 were reviewed, and 53 patients who received endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) drainage were finally included. General information, procedural conditions, clinical outcomes and adverse events were analyzed. The patients were categorized into two groups: the endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD) group ( n=46) and the endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) group ( n=7). Procedural characteristics, operation outcomes, and operation time were compared between the two groups. Results:There were 36 males and 17 females, with the age of 52.2±12.7 years, among whom 58.5% (31/53) were secondary to cholecystectomy. Clinical success was achieved in 83.0% (44/53) patients, with the operation time of 27.0 (13.5, 33.5) minutes and the treatment session of 1 (1, 2). The time to resolution was 89 (47, 161) days. The success rate of ERCP for low-grade biliary fistula was higher compared with that of high-grade biliary fistula [96.4% (27/28) VS 68.0% (17/25), χ2=7.57, P=0.006]. Bridging drainage achieved higher success rate compared with that of non-bridging drainage [91.7% (33/36) VS 64.7% (11/17), χ2=5.95, P=0.015], while different diameters of stents (≥10 Fr VS <10 Fr) achieved similar success rate [81.8% (27/33) VS 84.6% (11/13), χ2=0.05, P=0.822]. Adverse events occurred in 10 patients (18.9%), including 6 pancreatitis, 2 bleeding, 1 cholangitis and 1 death. Except for 1 death, 9 other adverse events were mild and managed with conservative treatment without interventions. There was no significant difference in clinical success rate [6/7 VS 82.6% (38/46), χ2=0.04, P=0.838] or the median operation time [28.0 min VS 23.0 min, Z=0.38, P=0.774] between ENBD group and ERBD group. Conclusion:Endoscopic biliary drainage is safe and effective for biliary fistula. ENBD and ERBD have comparable clinical efficacy. ERCP for low-grade biliary fistula may achieve a higher success rate, and bridging drainage may facilitate fistula resolution.