Résumé
Resumen Se estudió la actividad in vitro de delafloxacina, ciprofloxacina y levofloxacina por los métodos epsilométrico y de difusión por discos frente a 181 aislamientos clínicos de infecciones de piel y osteoarticulares. Se incluyeron 40 Staphylococcus aureus resistentes a meticilina (SARM), 44 S. aureus sensibles a meticilina (SASM), 46 estafilococos coagulasa negativos (ECN), 23 Klebsiella pneumoniae y 28 Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Las CIM50/CIM90 (mg/l) de delafloxacina, ciprofloxacina y levofloxacina respectivamente fueron 0,004/0,064, 0,25/16 y 0,125/4 frente a SARM; 0,002/0,004, 0,125/0,25 y 0,125/0,25 frente a SASM; 0,008/0,25, 0,125/>32 y 0,25/>32 frente a ECN; 4/>32,>32/>32 y 16/>32 frente a K. pneumoniae y 1/>32, 0,5/>32 y 4/>32 frente a P. aeruginosa. La proporción de aislamientos sensibles a delafloxacina, ciprofloxacina y levofloxacina fue la siguiente: SARM, 97,5%; 82,5% y 82,5%; SASM, 97,7%; 95,5% y 95,5%; ECN, 93,5%; 63,0% y 60,9%; K. pneumoniae, 21,7%; 26,1% y 43,5%; P. aeruginosa, 35,7%; 53,6% y 42,8%. La concordancia categórica del método de difusión por discos y el método epsilométrico para evaluar la actividad in vitro de la delafloxacina fue del 98,8% en S. aureus y del 91,3% en ECN.
Abstract In vitro activities of delafloxacin, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin were evaluated by epsilometric and disk diffusion methods against 181 bacterial isolates recovered from bone and skin infections. Isolates included were 84 Staphylococcus aureus (40 MRSA and 44 MSSA), 46 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), 23 Klebsiella pneumoniae and 28 Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The MIC50/MIC90 (mg/l) for delafloxacin, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, respectively, were: MRSA, 0.004/0.064, 0.25/16 and 0.125/4; MSSA, 0.002/0.004, 0.125/0.25 and 0.125/0.25; CNS, 0.008/0.25, 0.125/>32 and 0.25/>32; K. pneumoniae, 4/>32,>32/>32 and 16/>32; P. aeruginosa, 1/>32, 0,5/>32 and 4/>32. Susceptibilities for delafloxacin, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, respectively, were: MRSA, 97.5%, 82.5% and 82.5%; MSSA, 97.7%, 95.5% and 95.5%; CNS, 93.5%, 63.0% and 60.9%; K. pneumoniae, 21.7%, 26.1% and 43.5%; P aeruginosa, 35.7%, 53.6% and 42.8%. The disk diffusion and epsilometric methods were concordant for evaluating in vitro susceptibility in staphylococci (categorical concordance of 98.8% for S. aureus and 91.3% for CNS).
Résumé
The persistent antibiotics resistant issue has emerged as an influencing factor to deteriorate community health. So, new antibiotics development is urgent for the treatment of bacterial infections. Alternatively, delafloxacin is an eminent new fluoroquinolone, and chemically distinct from older fluoroquinolones. There is lack of proton substituent that indicates the poor acidic property of the drug. It also has a good intracellular penetration capacity that increases the intensity of the bactericidal property in acidic environment. Delafloxacin is a super active drug against the skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) and community-acquired respiratory tract infections. Delafloxacin also exhibits better efficacy against pathogens which are resistant to other fluoroquinolones, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Delafloxacin received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSI). Phase III clinical trial among patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is ongoing to evaluate the effectiveness of delafloxacin. From the aforementioned arguments, delafloxacin will be a prominent candidate for the upcoming antibacterial agent. Similarly, delafloxacin can be a crucial drug to fight against ABSSI.