X-Ray Microtomography Analysis of Gaps and Voids in the Restoration of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions with Different Composite Resins

Context (Background): Resin composites are the most widely used material for restoring cervical defects. However, the high failure rate of these restorations is still a concern. Aims: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate, using microtomography (?CT), the interfacial gap and voids formation in Class V cavities in premolars restored with materials with lower polymerization shrinkage combined with different restorative techniques. Settings and Design: Cervical defects were created in 30 intact premolar and were randomly distributed to be restored by one of the following techniques (n = 6): Composite resin with two increments (CR), organic modified polymer (ORMOCER) with single (OR1) or two increments (OR2, or low viscosity bulk?fill composite resin with single (BF1) or two increments (BF2). Methods and Material: Each tooth was scanned before filling to determine the volume of interest (VOI) to be applied in the second ?CT after restoration and to control the cavity volume among the groups. In the ?CT after filling, the volume of interfacial gaps and voids was calculated for each group. Statistical Analysis: The groups were compared using one?way and Tukey HSD post hoc test (? = 0.05). Results: It was possible to identify higher gap formation in the OR1 group and higher void formation in CR group (P < 0.05). OR2 group showed better results than the group with one increment. BF2 showed the best filling capacity. Conclusions: It was possible to conclude that the material and the number of increments directly influenced the internal adaptation and voids formation of Class V restorations.

Effect of different impression methods and ceramic materials on adaptation of inlays / Efeito de diferentes métodos de moldagem e materiais cerâmicos na adaptação de inlays

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the internal and marginal adaptation of inlays fabricated from different types of impressions (conventional and digital) and different ceramics (feldspathic and lithium disilicate). Material and Methods: Forty premolars were prepared for all-ceramic inlay restoration and assigned to 4 groups (n=10), according to the impression method (conventional with addition silicone and digital impression) and ceramic type (lithium disilicate and feldspathic ceramic blocks). For each type of impression, 10 inlays were milled from lithium disilicate blocks and the other 10 from feldspathic ceramic blocks in a CAD-CAM facility. The internal adaptation was analyzed by the replica technique. The marginal fit was analyzed under a stereo microscope by directly measuring the gap formed between the inlay and the tooth in the proximal and occlusal regions. Results: The marginal or internal adaptations were not affected by type of impression (conventional = digital impression), irrespective of the ceramic type. Only the internal adaptation was affected by the material type, i.e., feldspathic ceramic had lower values than lithium dissilicate ceramic, when considering the digital impression. Conclusion: The conventional and digital impressions promoted similar marginal and internal adaptation for feldspathic and disilicate ceramic inlays. For the digital impression the feldspathic inlays showed better internal adaptation than lithium dissilicate inlays. (AU)

Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a adaptação interna e marginal de inlays confeccionadas a partir de diferentes tipos de moldagens (convencional e digital) e diferentes materiais cerâmicos (feldspática e dissilicato de lítio). Materiais e Métodos: Quarenta pré-molares foram preparados para inlay totalmente cerâmica e distribuídos em 4 grupos (n = 10) segundo o método de moldagem (convencional com silicone de adição e moldagem digital) e tipo cerâmica (dissilicato de lítio e blocos de cerâmica feldspática). Para cada tipo de moldagem, 10 inlays foram confeccionadas a partir de pastilhas de dissilicato de lítio e as outras 10 de blocos de cerâmica feldspática, por meio do sistema CAD-CAM. A adaptação interna foi analisada pela técnica da réplica. O ajuste marginal foi analisado com estéreo microscópio medindo diretamente o espaço entre a inlay e o dente nas regiões proximal e oclusal. Resultados: As adaptações marginais e internas não foram afetadas pelo tipo de moldagem (convencional = impressão digital), independentemente do tipo de cerâmica. Somente a adaptação interna foi afetada pelo material, sendo que a cerâmica feldspática apresentou menores valores que a cerâmica de dissilicato, considerando a moldagem digital. Conclusão: As moldagens convencional e digital promoveram adaptação marginal e interna semelhante de inlays de cerâmica feldspática e dissilicato testadas. Para moldagem digital, a cerâmica feldspática mostrou melhor adaptação interna do que a dissilicato de lítio (AU)