Résumé
Objective To explore the application value of videolaryngoscope and Macintosh la ryngoscope in double-lumen endobronchial intubation.Methods Eighty patients (50 males,30 females,aged 18-70 years,ASA grade Ⅰ-Ⅲ) of both sexes,scheduled for thoracic surgery and double lumen endobronchial intubation were randomly divided into two groups using a random number table:videolaryngoscope group and Macintosh laryngoscope group.The intubation time,the success rate of intubation,the views of glottis,the hemodynamics during the first 4 minutes of intubation,the number of positive responses to intubation and the incidence of pharyngalgia at 24 h after the operation were observed and compared between the two groups,the condition of oral hemorrhage and the injury of the tracheal walls were recorded as well.Results Compared with videolaryngoscope group,the C-L grade and the success rate of the first intubation of Macintosh laryngoscope group was significantly higher,the intubation time of Macintosh laryngoscope group was significantly shor ter (P＜0.05).In addition,the positive cases of responses to intubation and the incidence of pharyngalgia at 24 h after the operation of Macintosh laryngoscope group were obviously less than those of videolaryngoscope group (P＜0.05).There was no significant difference between the two groups of oral injury bleeding and the injury of tracheal wall and protuberance.At T2,T3,the two groups of MAP were significantly lower than that of T1,and the MAP of videolaryngoscope group was significantly lower than that of t Macintosh laryngoscope group at T2,T3 (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Compared with videolaryngoscope,Macintosh laryngoscope is more suitable for the doublelumen endobronchial intubation in patients predicted without difficulty in intubating.
Résumé
Objective To evaluate and compare the clinical applications of Disposcope (DS)en-doscope and GlideScope (GS)video laryngoscope in double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT)intuba-tion of the patients with difficult airway.Methods Forty patients scheduled for elective thoracic sur-gery after failure to place the DLT with modified general laryngoscope 2 attempts were randomly dev-ided into 2 groups,20 cases in each group.Patients underwent DLT with DS (group DS)or GS (group GS)intubation after failure to intubation.The causes of the failure of intubation,the intuba-tion of the video laryngoscope,the time of intubation and the location of left double lumen tube were recorded.And the postoperative injury of oral mucosa,teeth and respiratory tract were observed. Results The causes of the difficulty for DLT intubation included:long,high arched palate,large epi-glottis,reduced jaw opening,protruding or loose incisors,over bite,reduced neck extension.The in-tubating achievement ratio was significantly higher in group DS than in group GS (P < 0.05 ).But there was no obvious difference between the two groups in the location success rate and intubation time.The postoperative incidence of tooth loss and oral mucosal injury was significantly higher in group GS than in group DS (P <0.05).Conclusion Both DS and GS were great helpful to intubation and location of DLT in the patients with difficult airway.But DS was more superior than that of GS in the difficult airway of reduced jaw opening,protruding or loose incisors,over bite and reduced neck extension.