Validation of the Korean Version of the Eating Disorder Inventory-2: Psychometric Properties and Cross-Cultural Comparison

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to examine the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Eating Disorder Inventory-2 (EDI-2) in Korean patients with eating disorders and healthy controls, and to investigate cultural differences of EDI-2 between a Korean group and a North American standardization sample. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Korean version of the EDI-2 was prepared after comprehensive clinical assessment of Korean patients with eating disorders (n=327) as well as female undergraduates (n=176). Results were compared between eating disorder subgroups (anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa and eating disorders not otherwise specified) and those of a North American standardization sample and healthy controls. RESULTS: The results showed that the Korean EDI-2 had adequate internal consistency (0.77-0.93) and discriminated well between patients with eating disorders and healthy controls on all subscales. Significant differences in EDI-2 subscale scores between the eating disorder groups and the healthy control group were observed; however, there was no discernible difference among the eating disorder subgroups. When compared with a North American standardization sample, the Korean control group showed significantly higher scores for drive for thinness and asceticism. When patient groups were compared, the Korean group showed significantly lower scores for perfectionism. CONCLUSION: As expected, the results accurately reflected psychometric properties of the Korean version of EDI-2 for eating disorder patients in Korea. These findings also suggest that common characteristics for the eating disorder exist as a whole rather than with significant difference between each subgroup. In addition, significant differences between the Korean and the North American groups for both patients and controls also demonstrated specific cultural differences.

Psychological Characteristics of Bulimic Women with and without a History of Anorexia Nervosa / 신경정신의학

OBJECTIVES: This study compared cognitive-behavioral traits related to eating behaviors, obsessive-compulsive traits, and depression levels in bulimic subjects with and without a history of anorexia nervosa according to the perspective that there are common diagnostic transitions over time in subgroups of eating disorders (anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and eating disorder not otherwise specified). METHODS: We compared EDI-2, MOCI, and BDI scores between the bulimic group with a history of anorexia (n=98), the bulimic group without a history of anorexia (n=99), and the non-clinic group (n=100) by ANOVA. RESULTS: The bulimic group with a history of anorexia showed significantly higher scores on four of the EDI-2 subscales (Ineffectiveness, Interoceptive Awareness, Impulse Regulation and Social Insecurity) than the other two groups. They also indicated significantly higher scores on both the MOCI subscale 'rumination' and BDI than both the other groups. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that it is important to consider a prior history of anorexia nervosa in order to understand symptom severity in patients with bulimia. Psychological variables such as ineffectiveness, impulse regulation, social insecurity, rumination, and depression are crucial to consider while treating bulimics with a history of anorexia.

Validación del Eating Disorder Inventory en una muestra de mujeres mexicanas con trastorno de la conducta alimentaria

resumen está disponible en el texto completo

Abstract: The Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI) is a psychometric instrument developed by Garner et al. for the evaluation of psychological traits in patients with eating disorders. The questionnaire offers an integral evaluative approach that includes other psychological characteristics besides those of fear of fatness. It consists of 64 items in 8 subscales: 1) Drive for Thinness, 2) Bulimia, 3) Body Dissatisfaction, 4) Ineffectiveness, 5) Perfectionism, 6) Interpersonal Distrust, 7) Interoceptive Awareness, 8) Maturity Fears. The EDI is an instrument widely used for the exploration of eating disorders (ED). Nevertheless, the use of psychometric scales in a population other than the one in which they were originally developed, requires careful adaptation. Items should be phrased in a culturally significant way, and even after that, constructs still could have different meanings in different contexts. The factorial grouping of the EDI in open populations has been reported as different from the results in clinical samples. Also, Lee and cols. reported a low correlation of the EDI subscales that measure weight preoccupation and the General Health Questionnaire - 12, concluding that fear of fatness is not related with emotional distress in their sample. In Mexico City, Alvarez and Franco conducted a validation study, finding good reliability and discriminative power, and a factorial grouping close to the original. On the other hand, in a sample of teenage girls from a semi-rural area, the factorial grouping was very different. Although we already have data about the EDI's specificity and sensitivity in Mexican ED patients, there are no studies of the validity and reliability of the test in this population. Therefore, our main objective in this work was to validate the EDI in a sample of Mexican ED patients. Also, the score information provided could be used for comparison purposes with other clinical samples. A non-probabilistic sample was obtained of all subsequent patients attending the ED Clinic at the National Institute of Psychiatry Ramón de la Fuente (INPRF) in the period 1997 2002 (n=523). Patients were diagnosed according to DSM-IV criteria in a clinical interview. They also completed other questionnaires, such as the Symptom Check List (SCL90) and the Coopersmith's Self-esteem Inventory. According to diagnosis, the sample was composed of compulsive/purging type anorexia nervosa, 5.7%; restrictive anorexia nervosa, 8%; purging type bulimia nervosa 45.1% and eating disorders not otherwise specified 41.3%. Mean age was 19.9 years (s.d.=3.9), within a rank of 13 to 39 years. Mean age at the beginning of ED was 16 years (s.d.=3.1). Mean educational level was 12 years (s.d.=3), i.e. high-school level. The sample included single women 93.9%, married 4.8% and divorcees, 1.4%. Mean Body Mass Index was 21 (s.d. = 5.5). Participants completed the EDI, SCL90, and Coopersmith's self-esteem inventory during their first visit to the Clinic. They were assured of the voluntary nature and confidentiality of their participation. Completing the tests took them about 60 minutes. An internal reliability analysis was conducted, followed by a factorial analysis of main components with Varimax rotation. Pearson correlations were made to assess the concurrent validity of EDI and other instruments. Analysis of variance was employed to compare between diagnostic groups. Data were captured and analysed in the SPSS software, versión 10.0. The first step of the analysis was the item-total correlation, considering as valid correlations equal or over 0.28. This step eliminated 12 items that were not included in further analyses. Cronbach's alpha was 0.93. Most of the items in the Perfectionism subscale disappeared in this step. Second step was factorial analysis. We found 6 factors with a minimum of 3 items included with factorial charges equal or over .40. Then a second analysis was conducted with only the 40 items that had been grouped in the 6 factors. Factor 1 included items from Bulimia and Interoceptive Awareness; factor 2, from Drive for Thinness and Body Dissatisfaction; factor 3, from Interoceptive Awareness; factor 4, from Ineffectiveness; factor 5, from Maturity Fears; and factor 6, from Body Dissatisfaction. The resulting factorial structure explained 56% of total variance. Cronbach's alpha of the final version was 0.92. Correlation analysis showed a positive and significant correlation of EDI with SCL-90, and a negative and significant correlation of EDI with Coopersmith's self-esteem inventory. Comparisons between diagnostic groups showed that bulimia nervosa patients had the highest scores in the EDI. Patients with restrictive AN had the lowest scores in all sub-scales except for Maturity Fears. Bulimia nervosa and compulsive/purging type AN patients were different from restrictive AN and EDNOS patients in the total score of Interoceptive Awareness and Ineffectiveness subscales. Bulimia nervosa was different from the other groups in Bulimia and Drive for Thinness subscales. The results show that, in this sample, many of the EDI items have a poor correlation with the scale, and factorial grouping is different from the original. However, once non-correlated items are eliminated, a version of the EDI remains that is valid and reliable. Items from the Perfectionism subscale were eliminated because of low correlation with the rest of the EDI. This supports the findings in Bulgaria, rural Mexico, and Mexico City. Maturity Fears, which also had dubious results in other studies, grouped correctly in this sample, although it did not distinguish among diagnostic groups. Analysis of variance showed that subscales were able to differentiate the Bulimia nervosa patients. Also, most of the variance explained corresponded to the Bulimia subscale, suggesting that EDI can detect bulimic attitudes, and so is a useful complement to instruments that are more capable of detecting anorexia nervosa, such as the Eating Attitudes Test. However, this could also be an effect of the sample's composition, with more than half of it being bulimic patients. Another important segment of variance was explained by Interoceptive Awareness, Ineffectiveness and Maturity Fears subscales, psychological traits that are not necessarily related to ED. In this sample, psychological subscales correlated with eating and weight attitude subscales, showed that Mexican patients do present ED according to the way they are conceptualized in the DSM-IV. Our results show that the EDI is adequate for the evaluation of psychological traits of ED patients in Mexico. Perfectionism and Interpersonal Distrust subscales are an exception, that requires further investigation.