RÉSUMÉ
La mayoría de las preguntas de investigación (PI), conducirán a un proyecto que apunta a generar nuevo conocimiento, sin embargo el escenario, la población a estudio y la metodología pueden ser muy diferentes, lo que determinará que los resultados obtenidos y por ende, el nivel de evidencia (NE) y el grado de recomendación (GR) puedan variar notablemente. El objetivo de este artículo fue proporcionar recomendaciones para formular una PI asociada al NE y respectivos GR que se pueden desprender a partir de los resultados generados. Este artículo entregará algunos conocimientos sobre la PI y su relación con los NE y GR de la evidencia generada a partir de resultados obtenidos por un proceso de investigación en diferentes escenarios de investigación.
SUMMARY: Most research questions (RQ) will lead to a project that aims to generate new knowledge. However, the setting, study population and methodology may be very different, which will determine the results obtained and therefore, the level of evidence (LOE) and the grade of recommendation (GOR) may vary significantly. The aim of this study was to provide recommendations to formulate a RQ associated with the LOE and respective GOR that can be derived from the generated results. This article will provide some knowledge about the RQ and its relationship with the LEO and GOR of the generated evidence from results obtained by a research process in different research scenarios.
Sujet(s)
Plan de recherche , Médecine factuelle , Recherche biomédicale/méthodes , Pratique factuelleRÉSUMÉ
Introducción: La esclerosis lateral amiotrófica (ELA) es la forma más común de enfermedad degenerativa de motoneurona en la edad adulta y es considerada una enfermedad terminal. Por lo mismo, el accionar del fonoaudiólogo debe considerar el respeto a los principios bioéticos básicos para garantizar una asistencia adecuada. Objetivo: Conocer aquellas consideraciones bioéticas relacionadas al manejo y estudio de personas con ELA para luego brindar una aproximación hacia el quehacer fonoaudiológico. Método: Se efectuó una búsqueda bibliográfica en las bases de datos PubMed, Scopus y SciELO. Se filtraron artículos publicados desde 2000 hasta junio de 2023 y fueron seleccionados aquellos que abordaban algún componente bioético en población con ELA. Resultados: Aspectos relacionados al uso del consentimiento informado y a la toma de decisiones compartidas destacaron como elementos esenciales para apoyar la autonomía de las personas. Conclusión: Una correcta comunicación y una toma de decisiones compartida son claves para respetar la autonomía de las personas. A su vez, la estandarización de procedimientos mediante la investigación clínica permitirá aportar al cumplimiento de los principios bioéticos de beneficencia y no maleficencia, indispensables para la práctica profesional.
Introduction: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is the most common form of degenerative motor neuron disease in adulthood and is considered a terminal disease. For this reason, the actions of the speech therapist must consider respect for basic bioethical principles to guarantee adequate assistance. Objective: To know those bioethical considerations related to the management and study of people with ALS to then provide an approach to speech therapy. Methodology: A bibliographic search was carried out in the PubMed, Scopus, and SciELO databases. Articles published from 2000 to June 2023 were filtered and those that addressed a bioethical component in the population with ALS were selected. Results: Aspects related to the use of informed consent and shared decision-making stood out as essential elements to support people's autonomy. Conclusion: Proper communication and shared decision-making are key to respecting people's autonomy. In turn, the standardization of procedures through clinical research will contribute to compliance with the bioethical principles of beneficence and non-maleficence, essential for professional practice.
RÉSUMÉ
In a context where different protocols for recommended practices in clinical voice assessment exist, while there are gaps in the literature regarding the evidence base supporting assessment procedures and measures, clinicians from regions where a strong community holding expertise in clinical and scientific voice practices lack can struggle to confidently develop their voice assessment practices. In an effort to improve voice assessment practices and strengthen professional identity among speech-language pathologists in Quebec, Canada, a community of practice (CoP) was established, with the aim of promoting knowledge sharing, implementing change in clinical practice, and improving professional identity. Thirty-nine participants took part in the CoP activities conducted over a four-month period, including virtual meetings and in-person workshops. Participants had a high rate of attendance (> 74% participation rate in virtual meetings), and were highly satisfied with their participation and intended to remain involved after the project's end. Statistically significant changes in voice assessment practices were observed post-CoP, regarding probability of performing assessments (p < .001), and perceived importance of assessment for evaluative purposes (p <.001), as well as improvements in assessment specific confidence, specifically for procedure of auditory-perceptual assessment (p < .001) and purpose of aerodynamic assessment (p = .05). Moreover, there was an increase in professional identity post-CoP (p < .001) and participants felt they made significant learnings. The present study highlighted the need to involve SLPs in future research to identify assessments that are relevant to the specific evaluative objectives of SLPs working with voice, and suggests CoPs are an efficient tool for that purpose.
En un contexto en el que existen diferentes protocolos para las prácticas recomendadas en la evaluación vocal clínica, y en el que se presentan vacíos en la literatura respecto a la base de evidencia que respalda los procedimientos y medidas de evaluación, los profesionales de regiones donde no hay una comunidad sólida con experiencia en prácticas vocales clínicas y científicas pueden enfrentar dificultades para desarrollar con confianza sus prácticas de evaluación vocal. Con el propósito de mejorar las prácticas de evaluación vocal y fortalecer la identidad profesional entre los logopedas de Quebec, Canadá, se estableció una comunidad de práctica (CdP). Esta tenía como objetivo fomentar el intercambio de conocimientos, implementar cambios en la práctica clínica y mejorar la identidad profesional. Un total de treinta y nueve participantes se involucraron en las actividades de la CdP, llevadas a cabo durante un período de cuatro meses, que incluyeron reuniones virtuales y talleres presenciales. Los participantes tuvieron una alta tasa de asistencia (> 74% de participación en las reuniones virtuales) y expresaron un alto grado de satisfacción con su participación, manifestando su intención de continuar involucrados después de la finalización del proyecto. Se observaron cambios estadísticamente significativos en las prácticas de evaluación vocal posterior a la CdP, en lo que respecta a la probabilidad de llevar a cabo evaluaciones (p < .001) y la percepción de la importancia de la evaluación con fines evaluativos (p < .001), así como mejoras en la confianza específica en la evaluación, particularmente en el procedimiento de evaluación auditivo-perceptual (p < .001) y el propósito de la evaluación aerodinámica (p = .05). Además, se registró un aumento en la identidad profesional posterior a la CdP (p < .001) y los participantes sintieron que obtuvieron aprendizajes significativos. El presente estudio destacó la necesidad de involucrar a los logopedas en investigaciones futuras, para identificar evaluaciones pertinentes a los objetivos evaluativos específicos de los logopedas que trabajan con la voz, y sugiere que las CdP son una herramienta eficiente con ese propósito.
RÉSUMÉ
Objetivo: Analisar as evidências sobre o efeito dos agentes tópicos empregados para a prevenção da radiodermatite em pacientes com câncer. Método: Revisão sistemática de estudos clínicos randomizados duplos-cegos construída conforme recomendações do Joanna Briggs Institute e busca nas bases de dados MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, além da literatura cinzenta. Utilizaram-se a ferramenta de avaliação crítica do JBI para ensaios clínicos randomizados para avaliar a possibilidade de viés, o Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation para a qualidade das evidências e o Gradepro® para recomendá-las. Resultados: Selecionaram-se 13 estudos que avaliaram diferentes agentes tópicos para prevenir a radiodermatite, a saber: corticosteroides, de ação antioxidante e fitoterápicos. A qualidade metodológica de cada estudo foi apropriada, mas a qualidade da evidência gerada pela reunião deles foi baixa, independentemente do tipo de agente tópico empregado, sugerindo que a confiança no seu efeito é limitada e tornando a força de recomendação fraca. Conclusão: Alguns agentes tópicos mostraram-se promissores para a prevenção de radiodermatite, mas as evidências aqui reunidas sobre a eficácia deles não permitem indicar seu uso para a prevenção de radiodermatite em pacientes com câncer. (AU)
Objective: To analyze the evidence on the effect of topical agents to prevent radiodermatitis in cancer patients. Methods: Systematic review of double-blind randomized clinical studies built according to JBI recommendations and search in the databases MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus, in addition to the Gray Literature. The JBI critical assessment tool for randomized clinical trials was used to assess the possibility of bias, GRADE for the quality of evidence, and Gradepro® to recommend them. Results: Thirteen studies were selected that evaluated different topical agents to prevent radiodermatitis, namely: corticosteroids, with antioxidant action and herbal medicines. The methodological quality of each study was appropriate. Still, the quality of evidence generated by pooling them was low, regardless of the type of topical agent employed, suggesting that confidence in its effect is limited and weakening the strength of the recommendation. Conclusions: Some topical agents have shown promise for the prevention of radiodermatitis, but the evidence gathered here about their effectiveness does not indicate their use for the prevention of radiodermatitis in cancer patients. (AU)
Objetivo: Analizar la evidencia sobre el efecto de los agentes tópicos utilizados para la prevención de la radiodermatitis en pacientes con cáncer. Método: Revisión sistemática de estudios clínicos aleatorizados, doble ciego, elaborados según las recomendaciones del JBI y buscados en MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS, Web of Science, Embase y Scopus, además de literatura gris. Se utilizó la herramienta de evaluación crítica JBI para ensayos clínicos aleatorios para evaluar la posibilidad de sesgo, GRADE para la calidad de la evidencia y Gradepro® para recomendarla. Resultados: Se seleccionaron trece estudios que evaluaron diferentes agentes tópicos para prevenir la radiodermatitis, a saber: corticosteroides, con acción antioxidante y fitoterapia. La calidad metodológica de cada estudio fue apropiada, pero la calidad de la evidencia generada al combinarlos fue baja, independientemente del tipo de agente tópico empleado, lo que sugiere que la confianza en su efecto es limitada y debilita la fuerza de la recomendación. Conclusión: Algunos agentes tópicos se han mostrado prometedores para la prevención de la radiodermatitis, pero la evidencia aquí reunida sobre su eficacia no nos permite indicar su uso para la prevención de la radiodermatitis en pacientes con cáncer. (AU)
Sujet(s)
Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Radiodermite/prévention et contrôle , Radiothérapie , StomathérapieRÉSUMÉ
Nursing practice in an organization result from the leadership processes developed for the profession. It is reflected in the performance of nurses in interprofessional teams and the quality of care they provide to patients1. Evidence-based practice (EBP) refers to decision-making in the development and delivery of health care services according to the best available research evidence, the experience of health care providers, and the values and preferences of patients. The adoption or implementation of EBP by organizations can lead to safer practices, better outcomes for individuals, and lower healthcare costs2. In the literature, "champions" have been identified as determinants and agents of change to ensure adoption within institutions.
Sujet(s)
Pratique factuelle , Leadership , Personnel infirmierRÉSUMÉ
Introdução: Cicatrizes visíveis podem acarretar agravos, sejam estéticos, psicológicos, funcionais ou sociais, principalmente de grande extensão e volume, como os queloides. A descoberta de novos tratamentos de queloides não é fácil, visto a presença de alguns entraves metodológicos e éticos, sendo uma área pouco explorada. A toxina botulínica tem sido apresentada como alternativa terapêutica em estudos nacionais e internacionais, sendo necessária uma compilação e destaque dos principais estudos que possam subsidiar a prática clínica. Assim, o objetivo foi apresentar uma revisão de escopo sobre a utilização terapêutica da toxina botulínica para o tratamento de cicatrizes queloides. Método: A revisão foi realizada através da estratégia PICO e utilizando o Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Foi realizada nas bases de dados PubMed/ Medline, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde e SciELO, considerando estudos do período de 2016 até setembro de 2021. Resultados: Foram encontrados 34 artigos no geral relacionados ao tema. Após filtragem e seleção, a revisão foi construída com apoio de 5 artigos. Os estudos variaram entre coorte, relatos de caso, ensaio clínico randomizado e caso-controle. Foi possível observar como principais resultados a ação a curto prazo da toxina botulínica na redução de queloides, maior efetividade na redução dos sintomas e possibilidades de utilização clínica para diferentes populações e manifestações clínicas. Conclusão: O mecanismo de ação da toxina botulínica pode facilitar o tratamento de queloides e redução de sintomas, sendo necessários estudos mais robustos para definição de protocolos cínicos de gestão de cicatrizes.
Introduction: Visible scars can cause problems, whether aesthetic, psychological, functional, or social, mainly of great extension and volume, such as keloids. The discovery of new treatments for keloids is not easy, given the presence of some methodological and ethical obstacles, and it is an area that is little explored. Botulinum toxin has been presented as a therapeutic alternative in national and international studies, requiring a compilation and highlighting of the main studies that can support clinical practice. Thus, the objective was to present a scoping review on the therapeutic use of botulinum toxin for the treatment of keloid scars. Method: The review was carried out using the PICO strategy and using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. It was carried out in the PubMed/ Medline, Virtual Health Library, and SciELO databases, considering studies from 2016 to September 2021. Results: Overall, 34 articles related to the topic were found. After filtering and selection, the review was constructed with the support of 5 articles. The studies varied between cohorts, case reports, randomized clinical trials, and casecontrol. It was possible to observe as main results of the short-term action of botulinum toxin in reducing keloids, greater effectiveness in reducing symptoms, and possibilities of clinical use for different populations and clinical manifestations. Conclusion: The mechanism of action of botulinum toxin can facilitate the treatment of keloids and reduce symptoms, requiring more robust studies to define effective scar management protocols.
RÉSUMÉ
ABSTRACT Cold sores require Healthcare professionals to employ specific approaches for prevention and management, with the need for effective therapeutic guidelines and ongoing improvement in patient care. Aim To evalúate the methodological quality of Clinical Guidelines (CG), clinical guides and manuals for care of the population affected by herpes labialis, to verify their compliance with evidence-based health standards. Materials and Method A search was conducted for CG on labial herpes in the MedicalLiteratureAnalysis andRetrieval System Online (Medline) database, Google Scholar, Brazilian Virtual Health Library (BVS), and sites of institutions/professional categories, using the descriptors "herpes labialis" or "oral herpes". Document quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Instrument (AGREE II). The Kappa test was used to avoid randomness or poor agreement between results. Results Analysis of the 12 selected publications on the management of labial herpes revealed flaws in quality, as the publications did not follow a quality standard. The main quality flaws identified were in "rigor in development" and "applicability. " Conclusions Priorities need to be redefined in the development of CG for clinical practice related to fever blisters to reduce the variability of the quality standard, and generate reliable, applicable recommendations.
RESUMO A Herpes labial requer dos profissionais abordagens específicas para prevenido e manejo, com a ne-cessidade de diretrizes terapéuticas eficazes e continuo aprimoramento do cuidado ao paciente. Objetivo avaliar a qualidade metodológica de documentos que abordaram Diretrizes Clínicas (DC), guias clínicos e manuais para o cuidado da populando afetada pelo herpes labial, verificando sua conformidade com padroes de saúde baseados em evidencias. Materiais e Método As DC sobre herpes labial foram pesquisadas na base de dados Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline), Google Académico, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS) e em sites de instituigoes/categorias profissionais, utilizando os descritores "herpes labial" ou "herpes oral". Utilizamos aferramenta The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Instrument (AGREE II) para a avaliagdo da qualidade. O teste Kappa também foi utilizado para evitar aleatoriedade ou baixa concordáncia entre os resultados. Resultados Na análise das 12 publicagoes selecionadas sobre o manejo do herpes labial, foram identificadas falhas na qualidade dos documentos, que ndo seguiram um padrdo de qualidade. As principais falhas de qualidade identificadas foram em "rigor no desenvolvimento" e "aplicabilida-de". Conclusao é necessário um reenfoque para definir prioridades no desenvolvimento de DC para a prática clínica do herpes labial, a fim de reduzir a variabilidade do padrdo de qualidade e gerar recomendagoes que possam ser confiáveis e aplicáveis.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective:To use the best evidence of noninvasive mechanical ventilation related pressure injury prevention in the clinic guided by integrated promoting action on research implementation in health services framework (i-PARIHS) and evaluate its effect.Methods:This study is an unsynchronized before and after control study. Convenience sampling method was used to select patients receiving non-invasive mechanical ventilation from 7 wards of Beijing Hospital from October 2019 to September 2021. A total of 575 patients receiving non-invasive mechanical ventilation from October 2019 to September 2020 were included in the control group and 602 patients from October 2020 to September 2021 were included in the trial group. The control group adopted the usual care measures, and the trial group applied the prevention program for noninvasive ventilation related facial pressure injuries. The incidence of pressure injury was compared between the two groups. Nurses in 7 wards were investigated before and after the intervention program to compare the changes of knowledge level.Results:In the control group, there were 354 males, 221 females, aged (77.13 ± 14.49) years old; in the trial group there were 392 males, 210 females, aged (75.60 ± 14.27) years old. The incidence of pressure injury in the trial group was lower than the control group, but showed no significant difference ( P>0.05). In the control group, 11 cases suffered pressure injury, including 5 cases in stage 2, 6 cases in stage 3 and above. There were 9 cases in the trial group, including 8 in stage 2 and 1 in stage 3 and above. The severity of pressure injury in the trial group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was significant ( χ2 = 3.83, 4.11, both P<0.05). The scores of the nurse′pressure injury knowledge increased from (6.77 ± 1.53) points to (7.15 ± 1.47) points, with a significant difference ( t = -2.31, P<0.05). Conclusions:Management of the prevention of noninvasive mechanical ventilation related facial pressure injury through evidence-based practice can reduce its incidence, reduce its severity, and it is beneficial to improve the clinical nurses' prevention knowledge and clinical practice level of facial pressure injury related to non-invasive mechanical ventilation.
RÉSUMÉ
@#Objective To explore the effect of evidence-based practice on reducing the incidence of severe oral mucositis in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Methods A multidisciplinary team was set up to carry out quality control circle activities according to the Australia Joanna Briggs Institute evidence-based health care model.Evidence-based evidence was combined with continuous quality improvement to evaluate the obstacle factors and promoting factors in the implementation process,and an evidence-based practice plan was constructed.The practice reform was carried out from three aspects:Formulating the grading nursing process of oral mucositis,improving the evaluation tools and strengthening the health education of patients.The incidence of severe oral mucositis,average hospitalization days and oral health-related quality of life of patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation before and after the practice were compared.Results After evidence-based nursing practice,the incidence of severe oral mucositis decreased from 67%to 34%.The average length of hospital stay decreased from 25.93 days to 24.70 days,and the average score of oral health-related quality of life decreased from 28.0 points to 17.5 points.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion By introducing evidence,quality control circle activities can effectively reduce the incidence of severe oral mucositis and average hospitalization days in patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation,improve the oral health-related quality of life of patients.
RÉSUMÉ
RESUMO Objetivo Caracterizar o conhecimento, habilidades, opiniões e principais barreiras percebidas por fonoaudiólogos, da área de linguagem infantil no Brasil, a respeito da prática baseada em evidências (PBE). Método O estudo foi conduzido entre agosto de 2021 e julho de 2022 por meio de um questionário online. Além de dados sociodemográficos e de campo de trabalho, foram considerados 22 itens relacionados à PBE e subdivididos em "conhecimento", "habilidades", "opinião" e "barreiras". Cada item apresentava cinco opções de resposta (discordo totalmente, discordo, não estou decidido, concordo, concordo totalmente). Ao total 122 fonoaudiólogos que atuam na área da linguagem infantil responderam ao questionário. Suas respostas foram descritas pela porcentagem de distribuição de frequência. O tempo de formação e o nível de domínio do inglês foram considerados para comparar o padrão de distribuição das respostas. Resultados Apesar da maioria dos fonoaudiólogos reportar ter aprendido as bases da PBE em sua formação acadêmica, há fragilidades em seu conhecimento e falta de domínio das estratégias de busca e avaliação crítica dos artigos científicos. Ainda que a maioria concorde que a aplicação da PBE é necessária para a prática fonoaudiológica e considere precisar aumentar o uso de evidências científicas em sua prática diária, são apontadas como barreiras a falta de artigos, dificuldades relacionadas à aplicação prática de resultados científicos e falta de apoio coletivo entre os colegas. Conclusão Este estudo alerta a comunidade acadêmica para a urgência de se considerar a PBE no contexto da Fonoaudiologia brasileira.
ABSTRACT Purpose To characterize the knowledge, skills, opinions, and main barriers perceived by speech-language pathologists, in child language in Brazil, regarding evidence-based practice (EBP). Methods The study was conducted between August 2021 and July 2022 using an online questionnaire. In addition to sociodemographic and field data, 22 items related to EBP were considered and subdivided into "knowledge", "skills", "opinion" and "barriers". Each item had five response options (strongly disagree, disagree, not decided, agree, strongly agree). A total of 122 speech-language pathologists who work with child language answered the questionnaire. Their responses were described by the percentage of frequency distribution. The time since graduation and the level of proficiency in English were considered to compare the distribution pattern of the answers. Results Although most speech-language pathologists report having learned the basics of EBP in their academic training, there are weaknesses in their knowledge and lack of mastery of search strategies and critical evaluation of scientific articles. Although most agree that EBP's use is necessary for speech-language practice and consider the need to increase the use of scientific evidence in their daily practice, the lack of articles, difficulties related to the practical application of scientific results and lack of collective support among colleagues are identified as barriers. Conclusion This study alerts the academic community to the urgency of considering EBP in the context of Brazilian Speech-Language Pathology.
RÉSUMÉ
Neste artigo problematizamos a questão de se a psicanálise tem ou não evidências de eficácia. A importância desta pesquisa se dá, uma vez que, em diversos países que são referência no campo da saúde, para que uma prática seja aceita ela deve ter evidências de eficácia e, embora como está exposto no corpo desta pesquisa, a psicanálise tem muitas pesquisas que evidenciam sua eficácia, curiosamente muitos países ainda não a consideram um tratamento baseado em evidências. Identificamos, dentro e fora do campo psicanalítico algumas razões para que ela não fosse considerada um tratamento baseado em evidências. Neste artigo, não apenas problematizamos a questão como também revelamos muitas pesquisas que comprovam a eficácia do tratamento psicanalítico para uma série de transtornos mentais.
Resumos In this paper we problematize the question of whether psychoanalysis has evidence of effectiveness. This study is important because in several countries that are a reference in the field of health, a practice must have evidence of effectiveness in order to be accepted; and although many studies have shown the effectiveness of psychoanalysis, several countries still do not consider it an evidence-based treatment. We identified, inside and outside the psychoanalytic field, some reasons why psychoanalysis is not considered an evidence-based treatment. In this article, we do not only problematize the question, but also reveal a number of studies that prove the effectiveness of psychoanalytic treatment for a series of mental disorders.
Dans cet article, nous problématisons la question de savoir si la psychanalyse a ou non des preuves d'efficacité. Cette recherche est important car, dans plusieurs pays qui sont des référence dans le domaine de la santé, pour qu'une pratique soit acceptée elle doit avoir des preuves d'efficacité et, bien que comme expliqué dans le corps de cette recherche, la psychanalyse dispose de nombreuses études qui démontrent son efficacité, curieusement de nombreux pays ne considèrent toujours pas la psychanalyse comme un traitement fondé sur des preuves. Nous avons identifié, tant à l'intérieur et qu'à l'extérieur du champ psychanalytique, certaines raisons pour lesquelles elle ne devrait pas être considéré comme un traitement fondé sur des preuves. Dans cet article, nous ne nous contentos pas de problematiser la question, mais nous révélons également de nombreuses recherches qui prouvent l'efficacité du traitement psychanalytique pour une série de troubles mentaux.
En este artículo, se discute si el psicoanálisis tiene o no evidencias de eficacia. La necesidad de plantear esta investigación se debe a que diversos países, referentes en el ámbito de la salud, exigen evidencias de eficacia para aceptar la práctica; sin embargo, como se expone en esta investigación, el psicoanálisis abarca muchas investigaciones que evidencian su eficacia, pero muchos países todavia no lo consideran un tratamiento basado en evidencias. Se identificó dentro y fuera del campo psicoanalítico algunas razones para que el psicoanálisis no sea considerado un tratamiento basado en evidencias. En este artículo no solo lo pone en debate, sino que también revela muchas investigaciones que comprueban la eficacia del tratamiento psicoanalítico para varios trastornos mentales.
RÉSUMÉ
Abstract Objective: to analyze the use of the Practical Approach to Care Kit as a technology adopted in nurses' clinical practice for HIV management in Primary Health Care. Method: an exploratory and descriptive research study anchored in the methodological framework of the Constructivist Grounded Theory. The participants were defined through initial sampling, with 12 nurses, and theoretical sampling, with five managers, totaling 17 participants. The data were collected by means of intensive interviews and documentary analysis, and they were analyzed in two stages: 1) Initial coding; and 2) Focused coding. Results: the professionals identified the Practical Approach to Care Kit as a technological innovation that contributed to expanding the clinical practice and to empowering nurses in the clinical management of HIV infection. They also highlighted its importance as a tool for guiding the different responsibilities and duties while sharing care, contributing to the provision of evidence-based practices. Conclusion: The Practical Approach to Care Kit is a technological innovation that has transformed nurses' clinical practice in HIV management, expanding their scope of activities in carrying out the diagnosis, assessing the health condition and counseling, evaluating adherence to the treatment, adverse effects and prescription of exams, medications, and immunobiological.
Resumo Objetivo: analisar a utilização do Practical Approach to Care Kit como uma tecnologia adotada na prática clínica dos enfermeiros no manejo do HIV na Atenção Primária à Saúde. Método: pesquisa exploratória e descritiva, ancorada no referencial metodológico da Teoria Fundamentada nos Dados Construtivista. A definição dos participantes foi realizada por amostragem inicial, com 12 enfermeiros, e amostragem teórica, com cinco gestores, totalizando 17 participantes. Os dados foram coletados por entrevistas intensivas e análise documental, e foram analisados em duas etapas: 1) codificação inicial; e 2) codificação focalizada. Resultados: os profissionais identificaram o Practical Approach to Care Kit como uma inovação tecnológica que contribuiu para a ampliação da prática clínica e empoderamento do enfermeiro no manejo clínico da infecção por HIV. Também destacaram sua importância como ferramenta para orientação das diferentes responsabilidades e atribuições no compartilhamento do cuidado, contribuindo para a prestação de práticas baseadas em evidências. Conclusão: o Practical Approach to Care Kit é uma inovação tecnológica que transformou a prática clínica do enfermeiro no manejo do HIV, ampliando seu escopo de atividades na realização do diagnóstico, avaliação da condição de saúde e aconselhamento, avaliação da adesão ao tratamento, efeitos adversos e prescrição de exames, medicamentos e imunobiológicos.
Resumen Objetivo: analizar el uso del Practical Approach to Care Kit como tecnología adoptada en la práctica clínica de los enfermeros en el manejo del VIH en la Atención Primaria de la Salud. Método: investigación exploratoria y descriptiva, basada en el marco metodológico de la Teoría Fundamentada en los Datos Constructivistas. La definición de los participantes fue realizada por muestreo inicial, con 12 enfermeros, y muestreo teórico, con cinco gestores, fueron 17 participantes en total. Los datos fueron recolectados a través de entrevistas intensivas y análisis de documentos, y fueron analizados en dos etapas: 1) codificación inicial; y 2) codificación enfocada. Resultados: los profesionales identificaron el Practical Approach to Care Kit como una innovación tecnológica que contribuyó a la expansión de la práctica clínica y al empoderamiento de los enfermeros en el manejo clínico de la infección por VIH. También destacaron su importancia como herramienta para orientar las diferentes responsabilidades y obligaciones en la distribución de la atención de los pacientes, contribuyendo a la prestación de prácticas basadas en evidencia. Conclusión: el Practical Approach to Care Kit es una innovación tecnológica que ha transformado la práctica clínica de los enfermeros en el manejo del VIH, ampliando su radio de acción para la realización del diagnóstico, evaluación del estado de salud y asesoramiento, evaluación de la adherencia al tratamiento, efectos adversos y prescripción de exámenes, medicamentos e inmunobiológicos.
Sujet(s)
Humains , Soins infirmiers intégraux , Pratique professionnelle , Infections à VIH/thérapie , Guide de bonnes pratiques , Prise en charge de la maladie , Équipe infirmiersRÉSUMÉ
Introducción: Colombia es uno de los países con mayor número de casos de COVID-19 en América Latina y el Caribe. Los gobiernos no pueden trabajar solos en una crisis de gran intensidad, por lo que las alianzas y la colaboración Gobierno-academia toman un valor preponderante. Objetivo: Sistematizar la experiencia del trabajo colaborativo que se realizó entre actores académicos de la región y las autoridades de salud del departamento de Santander, Colombia, en el marco de la emergencia sanitaria por COVID-19 durante 2020-2021. Metodología: A partir de la sistematización de experiencias y desde el enfoque crítico social se realizó un abordaje cualitativo con ocho actores clave del sector académico y de la autoridad en salud que participaron activamente en la alianza. Se hizo una revisión documental y se realizaron entrevistas semiestructuradas. Resultados: Una vez declarada la emergencia sanitaria, de manera rápida se conformaron dos grupos de trabajo colaborativo, uno entre academia y actores gubernamentales del municipio de Bucaramanga y otro entre academia y actores gubernamentales departamentales; ambos grupos se conformaron de manera voluntaria, pero se diferenciaron en su forma de organización. El trabajo colaborativo y voluntario brindó apoyo a las autoridades en salud, principalmente en la fase de preparación para afrontar la pandemia, traducción y difusión del conocimiento, vigilancia epidemiológica y actividades de fortalecimiento de la capacidad de respuesta. Conclusiones: El apoyo brindado por el equipo colaborativo fue muy proliferativo en actividades e intervenciones, no obstante, se presentaron dificultades y una de ellas fue que un número importante de sus recomendaciones no fueron atendidas por las autoridades sanitarias. Las dificultades presentadas no son diferentes a las ya reportadas en otras emergencias de salud pública, por lo que se requiere continuar fortaleciendo las relaciones Gobierno-academia para que se pueda trazar de manera proactiva una agenda que contribuya a superar las limitaciones que se reportan en este trabajo.
Introduction: Colombia is one of the countries with the highest number of COVID-19 cases in Latin America and the Caribbean. In a health crisis of high intensity, governments cannot work alone, so alliances and collaboration between Government and academia take on a preponderant value. Objective: Systematize the experience of the collaborative work carried out between academic actors in the region and the health authorities from the Department of Santander, Colombia in the framework of the health emergency due to COVID-19 during 2020-2021. Methods: Based on the systematization of experiences and from the critical social approach, a qualitative approach was carried out with eight key actors from the academic sector and the health authority that actively participated in the alliance. Documentary review and semi-structured interviews were conducted. Results: Once the health emergency was declared, two collaborative working groups were quickly formed, one between academia and government actors of the municipality of Bucaramanga and another between academia and departmental government actors; both groups were formed voluntarily but differed in their form of organization. The collaborative and voluntary work provided support to health authorities mainly in the preparation phase to face the pandemic, knowledge translation and dissemination, epidemiological surveillance, and response capacity-building activities. Conclusions: The support provided by the collaborative team was very proliferative in activities and interventions; however, difficulties occurred and one of them was that a significant number of their recommendations were not addressed by the health authorities. The difficulties presented are not different from those already reported in other public health emergencies, so it is necessary to continue strengthening the relations between Government-Academia, so that they can proactively draw up an agenda that contributes to overcoming the limitations that are reported in this work.
RÉSUMÉ
OBJETIVO: Identificar o uso da prática baseada em evidências (PBE) por docentes de enfermagem de Instituições de Ensino Superior no Brasil. MÉTODO: Estudo descritivo de abordagem quantitativa. A coleta de dados se deu por meio eletrônico utilizando instrumento "Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire", sendo enviado para a lista de contatos de docentes de instituições de graduação de enfermagem de diferentes estados brasileiros. RESULTADOS: Participaram do estudo 117 docentes de 17 estados do Brasil, com taxa de resposta de 21,3%. Dos 86,3% dos respondentes informaram abordar a PBE no ensino de enfermagem, atuaram como enfermeiro previamente (91,4%) e possuem como nível máximo de escolaridade o doutorado (57,2%). Nos domínios atitudes, conhecimento e habilidade sobre a PBE obteve-se escore elevado acima de 80%. CONCLUSÃO: os participantes abordam a PBE no ensino em que atuam; apresentam atitudes positivas e conhecimento relacionado à PBE de acordo com os escores utilizados.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the use of evidence-based practice (PBE) by nursing teachers of higher education institutions in Brazil. METHOD: Descriptive study of quantitative approach. The data collection took place electronically using the instrument "Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire", sent to the contact list of professors of undergraduate nursing institutions from different Brazilian states. RESULTS: 117 professors from 17 states of Brazil participated in the study, with a response rate of 21.3%. Of the 86.3% of the respondents reported approaching PBE in nursing education, acting as a nurse previously (91.4%), and having a doctorate as a maximum level of education (57.2%). In the domains of attitudes, knowledge, and skill about PBE, a high score above 80% was obtained. CONCLUSION: the participants approach PBE in the teaching in which they work; they present positive attitudes and knowledge related to PBE according to the scores used.
Sujet(s)
Universités , Corps enseignant et administratif de l'école d'infirmières , Pratique factuelle , Brésil , Enquêtes et questionnairesRÉSUMÉ
OBJETIVO: Identificar o uso da prática baseada em evidências (PBE) por docentes de enfermagem de Instituições de Ensino Superior no Brasil. MÉTODO: Estudo descritivo de abordagem quantitativa. A coleta de dados se deu por meio eletrônico utilizando instrumento "Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire", sendo enviado para a lista de contatos de docentes de instituições de graduação de enfermagem de diferentes estados brasileiros. RESULTADOS: Participaram do estudo 117 docentes de 17 estados do Brasil, com taxa de resposta de 21,3%. Dos 86,3% dos respondentes informaram abordar a PBE no ensino de enfermagem, atuaram como enfermeiro previamente (91,4%) e possuem como nível máximo de escolaridade o doutorado (57,2%). Nos domínios atitudes, conhecimento e habilidade sobre a PBE obteve-se escore elevado acima de 80%. CONCLUSÃO: os participantes abordam a PBE no ensino em que atuam; apresentam atitudes positivas e conhecimento relacionado à PBE de acordo com os escores utilizados.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the use of evidence-based practice (PBE) by nursing teachers of higher education institutions in Brazil. METHOD: Descriptive study of quantitative approach. The data collection took place electronically using the instrument "Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire", sent to the contact list of professors of undergraduate nursing institutions from different Brazilian states. RESULTS: 117 professors from 17 states of Brazil participated in the study, with a response rate of 21.3%. Of the 86.3% of the respondents reported approaching PBE in nursing education, acting as a nurse previously (91.4%), and having a doctorate as a maximum level of education (57.2%). In the domains of attitudes, knowledge, and skill about PBE, a high score above 80% was obtained. CONCLUSION: the participants approach PBE in the teaching in which they work; they present positive attitudes and knowledge related to PBE according to the scores used.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective. Within the context of evidence-based practice, this article exposes the reflection on the understanding and usefulness of the information provided by the research findings shared in reports and research publications, exposing differences based on the interpretation of statistical significance and clinical significance. Content synthesis. Basic aspects of the meaning and use of the information reported by research on p value (statistical significance) and the value and usefulness of these results are analyzed and exemplified, contrasting the value for the practice of an additional judgment on clinical significance. In addition to establishing conceptual differences, the need is highlighted for nurses to have the competencies to differentiate and apply each of them according to the clinical contexts of their potential implementation. Conclusion. The real usefulness of research about interventions within the context of nursing care is given by its real application and reach for the practice and benefit for patients. For this to occur, nurses must interpret adequately the information provided by scientific publications and other research reports.
Objetivo. En el contexto de una práctica basada en evidencia, este artículo expone la reflexión sobre la comprensión y utilidad de la información que proveen los hallazgos de investigación reportados en informes y publicaciones de investigación, exponiendo las diferencias a partir de la interpretación de la significancia estadística y significancia clínica. Síntesis del contenido. Se analizan y ejemplifican aspectos básicos sobre el significado y uso de la información que reportan las investigaciones sobre valor p (significancia estadística) y el valor y utilidad de estos resultados contrastando el valor para la práctica de un juicio adicional sobre significancia clínica. Además de establecer diferencias conceptuales, se resalta la necesidad de que las enfermeras tengan las competencias para diferenciar y aplicar cada uno de ellos según los contextos clínicos de su potencial implementación. Conclusión. La real utilidad de la investigación sobre intervenciones en el contexto del cuidado de enfermería está dada por su real aplicación y alcance para la práctica y el beneficio para los pacientes. Para que ello ocurra, las enfermeras deben interpretar adecuadamente la información que proveen las publicaciones científicas y otros reportes de investigación.
Objetivo. No contexto de uma prática baseada em evidências, este artigo apresenta a reflexão sobre a compreensão e utilidade da informação fornecida pelos resultados da investigação relatados em relatórios de investigação e publicações, expondo as diferenças com base na interpretação da significância estatística e da significância clínica. Síntese de conteúdo. Aspectos básicos sobre o significado e uso das informações relatadas pelas pesquisas sobre valor p (significância estatística) e o valor e utilidade desses resultados são analisados e exemplificados, contrastando o valor para a prática de um julgamento adicional sobre significância clínica. Além de estabelecer diferenças conceituais, destaca-se a necessidade de o enfermeiro ter competências para diferenciar e aplicar cada uma delas de acordo com os contextos clínicos de seu potencial implementação. Conclusão. A real utilidade da investigação sobre intervenções no contexto dos cuidados de enfermagem é dada pela sua real aplicação e âmbito de prática e benefício para os pacientes. Para que isso ocorra, os enfermeiros devem interpretar adequadamente as informações fornecidas pelas publicações científicas e outros relatórios de pesquisa.
Sujet(s)
Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Recherche en soins infirmiers , Interprétation statistique de données , Pratique factuelle , Pertinence clinique , Soins infirmiers courantsRÉSUMÉ
Background: Evidence-based practice across United Arab Emirates has been widely adopted as country strategic direction but the knowledge, attitudes, and its implementation among nurses are yet to be explored. This study explored the knowledge, attitude and implementation of EBP among nurses working in the UAE. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from 1,602 nurses working in different healthcare settings across the UAE. Two tools were used in the survey for data collection: the self-reported EBP Questionnaire created by Upton and the EBP Implementation scale by Melnyk, Fineout-Overholt, and Mays. Results: A total of 1602 nurses (response rate: 95.9%) completed the questionnaire. The mean age was 38.7 years (age range=20-60 years). The study found that the majority of participants were female (84.1%), with 39.6% being staff nurses and the largest group (28.2%) having 11-15 years of nursing experience. Attitudes towards EBP showed the highest mean score of 4.93±1.7 followed by knowledge (4.5±1.4) and practice (3.92±1.7). Hence, the nurses' attitudes towards EBP appeared to be positive, their implementation and knowledge were comparatively moderate. The total EBPQ score was found to be 106.3 out of 168. Conclusions: The study's finding can be used as a starting point for future evaluations and the development of strategies to encourage EBP utilization among nurses in the UAE. Establishing academic and professional development programs for EBP is necessary for organizations and nursing leaders. Combining EBP education with mentor support can encourage nurses to engage in clinical practice informed by the best available evidence.
RÉSUMÉ
El aumento de la producción de investigación primaria y de las revisiones de la literatura durante las últimas décadas ha hecho necesario el desarrollo de un nuevo diseño metodológico para sintetizar la evidencia: los overviews. Un overview es un diseño de síntesis de evidencia que toma como unidad de análisis a las revisiones sistemáticas, con el objetivo de extraer y analizar los resultados para una pregunta de interés nueva o más amplia, ayudando así a mejorar los procesos de toma de decisiones informadas. El objetivo de este artículo es introducir al lector a este tipo de resúmenes de evidencia, destacando las diferencias con los otros tipos de síntesis de evidencia, los aspectos metodológicos particulares de los overviews, y los desafíos pendientes. Este artículo es el duodécimo de una serie metodológica colaborativa de revisiones narrativas sobre temáticas de bioestadística y epidemiología clínica.
The increasing production of primary research and literature reviews in the last decades has made it necessary to develop a new methodological design to synthesize the evidence: the overviews. An overview is a type of evidence synthesis that uses systematic reviews as the unit of analysis, with the aim of extracting and analyzing the results for a new or broader research question, helping the shared decision-making processes. The aim of this article is to introduce the reader to this type of evidence summaries, highlighting the differences between overviews and other types of synthesis, the unique methodological aspects of overviews, and future challenges. This is the twelfth article from a collaborative methodological series of narrative reviews about biostatistics and clinical epidemiology.
Sujet(s)
Humains , Médecine factuelle , Statistiques comme sujet , Revues systématiques comme sujetRÉSUMÉ
Objetivo: Caracterizar os estudos de intervenção cadastrados por enfermeiros no Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos. Métodos: Estudo descritivo, com abordagem quantitativa, realizado mediante acesso virtual ao Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos, para busca dos estudos cadastrados na plataforma. Após leitura dos 3350 resumos disponíveis, os 320 cadastrados por enfermeiros foram selecionados para compor a amostra. Foi realizada a análise descritiva, no software R. Resultados: Foram encontrados estudos registrados entre 2010 e 2019, dos quais 49,7% localizavam-se na região Sudeste, 49,3% cadastrados por doutores, 46,3% filiados a universidades federais. A área da enfermagem mais estudada (18,8%) tratou-se de saúde do adulto, 72,9% possuíam dois braços, 53,1% com recrutamento concluído, 50,3% realizados com cegamento e o tipo de intervenções mais estudado (21,9%) foi a educativa. Conclusão: A maioria dos estudos de intervenção cadastrados por enfermeiros no Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos testaram intervenções educativas, em adultos, possuíram cegamento e foram randomizados. (AU)
Objective: To characterize the intervention studies registered by nurses in the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials. Methods: Descriptive study, with quantitative approach, carried out through virtual access to the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials, to search for the studies registered on the platform. After reading the 3350 abstracts available, the 320 registered by nurses were selected to make up the sample. Descriptive analysis was performed in the software R. Results: Studies registered between 2010 and 2019 were found, of which 49.7% were in the Southeast region, 49.3% registered by doctors, 46.3% affiliated to federal universities. The most studied nursing area (18.8%) it was adult health, 72.9% had two arms, 53.1% with completed recruitment, 50.3% performed blinding and the most studied type of interventions (21.9%) was the educational. Conclusion: Most intervention studies registered by nurses in the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials tested educational interventions in adults, blinded and randomized. (AU)
Objetivo: Caracterizar los estudios de intervención registrados por enfermeros en el Registro Brasileño de Ensayos Clínicos. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo, con enfoque cuantitativo, realizado a través del acceso virtual al Registro Brasileño de Ensayos Clínicos, para buscar estudios registrados en la plataforma. Después de leer los 3350 resúmenes disponibles, los 320 registrados por enfermeros fueron seleccionados para componer la muestra. Se realizó análisis descriptivo en el software R. Resultados: Se encontraron estudios registrados entre 2010 y 2019, de los cuales el 49,7% se ubicaron en la región Sudeste, el 49,3% fueron registrados por médicos, el 46,3% fueron afiliados a universidades federales. El área de enfermería más estudiada (18,8 %) fue la salud del adulto, el 72,9 % tenía dos brazos, el 53,1 % había completado el reclutamiento, el 50,3 % estaba cegada y el tipo de intervenciones más estudiadas (21,9 %) fue la educativa. Conclusión: La mayoría de los estudios de intervención registrados por enfermeros en el Registro Brasileño de Ensayos Clínicos probaron intervenciones educativas en adultos, fueron ciegos y aleatorizados. (AU)