Conflito de competência entre órgãos da saúde e da agricultura na inspeção e fiscalização de açougues no Estado de São Paulo / Conflict of jurisdiction between health and agriculture agencies in the inspection and supervision of butcheries in the state of Sao Paulo

O presente artigo abordou o conflito de competência existente entre os órgãos da saúde e da agricultura no tocante à inspeção e fiscalização de açougues no estado de São Paulo, com a apresentação dos elementos responsáveis por esse conflito, as atividades rotineiras nas quais ele se torna perceptível, seus efeitos e as soluções possíveis para que seja eliminado. Foram realizadas revisão bibliográfica e pesquisa da legislação existente sobre o assunto, além de levantamento jurisprudencial no Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de São Paulo. A análise do assunto permitiu concluir que o conflito existe devido à ausência de definições e delimitações legais para as atividades desempenhadas por estabelecimentos fiscalizados por órgãos da saúde e da agricultura. Os principais prejudicados são as autoridades sanitárias, que, atuando sob insegurança jurídica, têm sua atividade suscetível a questionamentos. A própria população sofre consequências diretas desse conflito, na medida em que as garantias constitucionais ao adequado processo fiscalizatório não são observadas. A solução envolve medidas como a criação de legislações infraconstitucionais que estabeleçam limites entre as atividades de açougues e de entrepostos e a reorganização das normas infraconstitucionais já existentes; a alteração da composição do Sistema Único de Saúde, permitindo um trabalho colaborativo entre os ministérios da Saúde e da Agricultura, além de delimitação de atribuições e responsabilidades próprias de cada órgão; a criação de serviços de inspeção municipal em todos municípios; e a incorporação de parte da atividade desempenhada pelo Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento à Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária.

This article addressed the existing conflict of jurisdiction between health and agriculture agencies regarding the inspection and supervision of butcheries in the state of São Paulo, with the presentation of the elements responsible for this conflict, the routine activities in which it becomes noticeable, its effects and the possible solutions for its elimination. Bibliographic review and research of existing legislation on the subject were carried out, as well as a jurisprudential survey at the Court of Justice of the State of São Paulo. It was possible to conclude that the conflict exists due to the absence of legal definitions and delimitations for the activities performed by establishments supervised by health and agriculture agencies. The main victims are the health authorities who, acting under legal uncertainty, have their activity susceptible to questions. The population itself suffers direct consequences from this conflict, insofar as the constitutional guarantees to the appropriate supervisory process are not observed. The solution involves measures such as the creation of infraconstitutional laws that establish limits between the activities of butcheries and warehouses and the reorganization of existing infraconstitutional norms; the change in the composition of the Brazilian Unified Health System, allowing collaborative work between the Ministries of Health and Agriculture, as well as the delimitation of the duties and responsibilities of each agency; the creation of municipal inspection services in all municipalities; and the incorporation of part of the activity performed by the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply to the National Health Surveillance Agency.

Etapas de cambio en alimentos con etiquetado frontal de advertencia / Stages of change in foods with front warning labeling

Los datos en Chile demuestran el efecto que causa la mala alimentación y sus consecuencias. Considerando los problemas alimentarios, el 26 de junio de 2016, la Ley 20.606, entró en vigencia. Determinar el estado de cambio en la intención de compra de alimentos con sello de advertencia en la tercera etapa de la ley. Estudio descriptivo transversal en población chilena, de ambos sexos, entre 18 y 59 años de edad, en usuarios frecuentes de internet. Los datos se obtuvieron a través de una encuesta creada y validada mediante el método de Lawshe, la cual contiene un total de 45 preguntas, en las que se plantea, ¿qué nivel de confianza siente el participante para realizar un cambio? y ¿Cuán importante es para el realizar ese cambio?. Se analizaron 545 encuestas a nivel nacional, el 59,8% corresponde a mujeres, del total de personas el 52,1% es mayor de 30 años de edad. Respecto a la compra de alimentos con sello según sexo, se observa que hay diferencias significativas en la compra de galletas, papas fritas y bebidas azucaradas, en todos los casos los hombres presentan una mayor resistencia al cambio que las mujeres. Pese a que todos los alimentos se encuentran en contemplación, hay diferencias significativas en el puntaje en galletas y bebidas azucaradas y papas fritas en los hombres, respecto a la edad, hay diferencias en todos los alimentos. Al comparar por estado nutricional se observan diferencias significativas en bebidas, galletas, papas fritas y chocolates, en obesidad. Los hombres presentan una mayor resistencia al cambio, por otro lado, se observa que la intención de compra de todos los alimentos se encuentra en contemplación sin embargo hay diferencias en todos los alimentos.

Data in Chile demonstrate the effect caused by poor diet and its consequences. Considering food problems, on June 26, 2016, Law 20,606 came into force. To determine the status of change in the intention to purchase food with a warning labels in the third stage of the law. Cross-sectional descriptive study in a Chilean population, of both sexes, between 18 and 59 years of age, in frequent Internet users. The data were obtained through a survey created and validated using the Lawshe method, which contains a total of 45 questions, in which it is asked, what level of confidence does the participant feel to make a change? And how important is it for making that change?. 545 surveys were analyzed at the national level, 59.8% correspond to women, of the total number of people 52.1% are over 30 years of age. Regarding the purchase of food stamped by sex, it is observed that there are significant differences in the purchase of cookies, French fries and sugary drinks, in all cases men present a greater resistance to change than women. Although all foods are in contemplation, there are significant differences in the score in cookies and sugary drinks and French fries in men, with respect to age, there are differences in all foods. When comparing by nutritional status, significant differences are observed in beverages, cookies, French fries and chocolates, in obesity. Men present greater resistance to change, on the other hand, it is observed that the intention to purchase all foods is in contemplation, however there are differences in all foods.