Comparación de resultados entre el retrasplante y el trasplante renal primario en el Hospital Hermanos Ameijeiras de 1984 a 2012 / Comparison of results between retransplantation and primary kidney transplantation on Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital from 1984 to 2012

Introducción: el retrasplante constituye la mejor opción terapéutica para los enfermos que pierden un primer trasplante renal y vuelven a diálisis, existen disímiles criterios en cuanto a sus resultados al compararlos con los trasplantes renales primarios. Objetivo: analizar el porcentaje de retrasplantes, revisar la supervivencia del injerto y del enfermo, el comportamiento de variables que pueden incidir en los resultados y compararlos con los de los enfermos que reciben un primer trasplante renal. Métodos: se realizó un estudio analítico, descriptivo, retrospectivo, de los trasplante renales realizados en el Hospital Hermanos Ameijeiras desde 1984 hasta diciembre de 2012; quedaron excluidos, los terceros trasplante, dobles (2 riñones a un mismo receptor), combinados (páncreas-riñón e hígado-riñón) y aquellos en los que no fue posible obtener la información requerida para la investigación. Se compararon (entre los grupos retrasplantes y primeros trasplantes) variables de índole general: edad de los receptores y donantes, sexo del receptor, enfermedad que ocasionó la insuficiencia renal, porcentaje de reactividad ante un panel de linfocito (PRA), compatibilidades HLA, tipo de donante (vivo o cadáver), tiempos de isquemia, presencia y duración de necrosis tubular aguda (donante cadáver), rechazo y supervivencia del injerto y el paciente. Resultados: los retrasplantes constituyeron el 5,4 por ciento de la muestra. No existieron diferencias entre edades, sexo, PRA, compatibilidades ni tipo de donante entre los segundos y primeros injertos. Los enfermos que llegaron a la insuficiencia renal por riñones poliquísticos nunca han recibido en nuestro centro un segundo trasplante. Resultó significativamente estadístico el uso de terapia cuádruple secuencial como inmunosupresión de inducción en los retrasplantes (55,9 por ciento vs. 9,7 por ciento de los primarios...

Introduction: retransplant constitutes the best therapeutic choice for patients who lose a first renal transplant and return to dialysis, existing dissimilar criteria as to its results when ranking them with renal primary transplant. Objective: to analyze the percentage of retransplantation, to revise graft and patient survival, to review the behavior of variables that can affect the results and to compare them with patients receiving a first renal transplant. Methods: an analytic, descriptive, retrospective study was accomplished, including all renal transplant performed at the Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital from 1984 to December of 2012. Third transplants, double transplants (two kidneys to the same receptor), combined transplants (pancreas-kidney and liver-kidney) and those where it was not possible to obtain the information required for this research were excluded. Variables of general nature were compared between retransplantation groups and first transplants, such as: age of recipient and donor, sex of the recipient, a disease that caused kidney failure, percentage of reactivity to a lymphocyte panel (PRA), HLA compatibility, donor type (living or dead), ischemia time, presence and duration of acute tubular necrosis (dead donor), rejection and graft and patient survival. Results:rRetransplant constituted only 5.4 percent of the sample (34 patients). There were no differences in age, sex, PRA, donor type or compatibilities between the second and first grafts. Patients who reached the renal failure due to polycystic kidneys have never had a second transplant in our institution. The use of sequential quadruple therapy as induction immunosuppression, retransplantation (55.9 percent vs. 9.7 percent of primary) was statistically significant...

Living-Donor Renal Transplantations, Analysis of Risk Fanctors Influencing the Outcome of 190 Cases

We have performed 190 renal transplantations from August 1990 to June 1996. No cadaveric donor was used and all except one were first grafts. We conducted a clinical analysis, especially concerning the factors affecting acute rejection and graft function at 1 year. The results were as follows : 1) The mean ages of donor and recipient were 35.3 years and 37.4 years respectively. The ratio of male to female was 1.4 : 1 and 1.5 : 1, respectively. 2) One hundred and six cases(55.8%) were living unrelated donors and eighty four cases(44.2%) were living related donors. 3) One hundred and sixty six potential recipients were given 3 donor specific transfusions(DST), started about 5 weeks prior to transplantation with cyclosporin coverage. Six of these patients(3.6%) developed sensitization by DST that precluded the subsequent transplantation and the remaining 160 patients received the kidney from the blood donors. Another 28 recipients were given DST 24 hours prior to operation. 4) Most of initial acute rejection episodes(71 episodes, 95%) appeared within the first month of post-transplantation. 5) We analyzed the possible factors affecting the incidence of acute rejection. Donor age and HLA incompatibility were significant statistically(p<0.05). 6) Multiple regression analysis showed that a number of acute rejection episodes(p<0.001) was the only independent risk factor for the graft function at 1 year. 7) Overall graft and patient survival rate were 97.2% and 98.6% at 1 year, 94.1% and 95.5% at 3 years.