Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway as an Independent Ventilatory and Intubating Device in Lateral Position: A Fibreoptic Study

Sudden airway loss during surgery in a laterally positionedpatient may have hazardous consequences. We studiedwhether the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) facilitatesfibreoptic guided tracheal intubation in patients positioned inthe lateral position. Anesthesia was induced with propofol,fentanyl, and rocuronium in 90 consenting patients of eithersex, weighing 50-70 Kg undergoing surgery. Patients wererandomized to three groups (n=30 each); Group 1 (Controlgroup) Supine position, or positioned on their right or left sides(Group 2 and Group 3 respectively) before induction of generalanesthesia. ILMA insertion and fibreoptic guided intubation wasperformed in that position. The grade of the glottic view, timerequired for intubation and number of adjusting maneuversused were recorded. Data were compared by ANOVA, multiple‘t’ test and chi(2) test. Demographic and airway measureswere similar in the three groups. The time required for ILMAinsertion (<30 secs) and success rate was similar in threegroups. The time to intubation was also similar ineach group (15.24±3.4719.68±17.29 secs, 19.35±11.83 secsin Groups 1, 2, 3 respectively; p = > 0.05), as was intubationsuccess (97.7%). Hence ILMA offers a frequent success rateand a clinically acceptable intubation time (<1 min) even in thelateral position.

Application of Intubation Laryngeal Mask in Laparoscopic Anesthesia for Elderly Patients with Hypertension / 中国微创外科杂志

Objective To investigate the application of intubation laryngeal mask in laparoscopic anesthesia for elderly patients with hypertension. Methods A total of 80 patients ( ASA Ⅱ -Ⅲ) over 70 years old undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal and gallbladder surgery from March 2014 to February 2015 were selected.They were randomly divided into the intubating laryngeal mask group ( ILMA group) or endotracheal tube group ( ET group) , with 40 patients in each group.After the intubation, the two groups were anesthetized with remifentanil by target-controlled infusion ( TCI ) and sevoflurane inhalation.The ILMA group was inserted matching laryngeal mask to control respiratory ventilation and deepened to the proper depth of anesthesia.An endotracheal tube were inserted through the mask 5 min later, and then the breath was controlled via transtracheal catheter to maintain anesthesia.The ET group was inserted tracheal intubation after induction, and then the breath was controlled until extubation after the recovery of the tracheal extubation after surgery.The heart rate (HR), blood pressure (SBP and DBP) and bispectral index (BIS) were recorded at time points of before induction (T0), laryngeal mask or endotracheal tube insertion (T1), after endotracheal tube insertion (T2), skin incision (T3), beginning tissue dissection or entry of laparoscope (T4), resection of organs or tissues (T5), and tracheal extubation ( T6 ) , respectively.In addition, the recovery time, the recovery of spontaneous breathing, complications during the recovery time, such as restlessness, nausea and vomiting, were observed and compared. Results There were significant differences in HR, SBP, DBP, BIS between the two groups and among different time points (P=0.000).At time points of before operation ( T0 -T2 ) and anesthesia maintaining stage ( T3 -T6 ) , the HR, SBP, DBP and BIS were stable in both groups.At the time points of after endotracheal intubation ( T2 ) and extubation ( T6 ) , the ET group had significantly increased HR, SBP, and DBP, which were higher than the ILMA group (P<0.05).At the time point of T6, the BIS values were significantly increased in the ET group than the ILMA group (P<0.05).On postoperative recovery quality, the time from anesthesia to spontaneous breathing recovery and from end of surgery to call to open eyes was significantly longer in the ET group than the LIMA group [(130.1 ±26.1) min vs. (96.4 ±24.5) min, t=5.94, P=0.000;(16.1 ±2.7) min vs.(5.5 ±2.2) min, t=19.07, P=0.000]. Conclusion For elderly patients with hypertension undergoing laparoscopic surgery, use of intubation laryngeal mask for anesthesia is more stable and has less adverse cardiovascular reactions, with good outcomes of anesthesia recovery.

A comparative study of overall efficacy and hemodynamic effects following blind oro-tracheal intubation with ILMA vs. conventional direct laryngoscopy guided intubation with Macintosh laryngoscope.

Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA) is a new device to guide blind oro-tracheal intubation thus offering a new approach for endotracheal intubation and is expected to produce less sympathetically driven haemodynamic stress response. The purpose of this study was to assess overall efficacy, haemodynamic advantage and complication rate with use of ILMA compared to conventional method of endotracheal intubation with use of Macintosh Laryngoscope (ML). Methods: This randomized controlled study was conducted on 60 adult patients comparable in age, sex, weight, MPC and ASA status scheduled for elective surgeries. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups of 30 each. Both the groups received similar balanced anaesthesia technique (Inj. fentanyl 2 μg/kg, propofol 2-2.5 mg/kg, rocuronium 1 mg/kg). Tracheal intubation was done using either ILMA or Macintosh laryngoscope. The intubation time, number of attempts required for successful intubation, haemodynamic changes and oro-pharyngo-laryngeal complications encountered during both the methods were recorded. Results: Time to intubation was comparatively longer in the ILMA group than laryngoscopy group (P <0.05). The success rate of intubation was 100% in both the groups. Overall haemodynamic changes in both the groups were statistically comparable (P >0.05) and ILMA appears to be offering no haemodynamic advantage over ML. The incidence of complications was rare and comparable amongst both the groups (P >0.05). Conclusions: Therefore in patients with normal airway blind intubation with ILMA is a successful and equally efficacious method without significant oro-pharyngo-laryngeal morbidity but offers no added haemodynamic advantage compared to conventional direct laryngoscopy with ML. Thus ILMA may act as a suitable alternative to ML for patients with normal airway.

Hemodynamic responses and upper airway morbidity following tracheal intubation in patients with hypertension: conventional laryngoscopy versus an intubating laryngeal mask airway

OBJECTIVES: We compared hemodynamic responses and upper airway morbidity following tracheal intubation via conventional laryngoscopy or intubating laryngeal mask airway in hypertensive patients. METHODS: Forty-two hypertensive patients received a conventional laryngoscopy or were intubated with a intubating laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesia was induced with propofol, fentanyl, and cis-atracurium. Measurements of systolic and diastolic blood pressures, heart rate, rate pressure product, and ST segment changes were made at baseline, preintubation, and every minute for the first 5 min following intubation. The number of intubation attempts, the duration of intubation, and airway complications were recorded. RESULTS: The intubation time was shorter in the conventional laryngoscopy group than in the intubating laryngeal mask airway group (16.33 ± 10.8 vs. 43.04±19.8 s, respectively) (p<0.001). The systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the intubating laryngeal mask airway group were higher than those in the conventional laryngoscopy group at 1 and 2 min following intubation (p<0.05). The rate pressure product values (heart rate x systolic blood pressure) at 1 and 2 min following intubation in the intubating laryngeal mask airway group (15970.90 ± 3750 and 13936.76 ± 2729, respectively) were higher than those in the conventional laryngoscopy group (13237.61 ± 3413 and 11937.52 ± 3160, respectively) (p<0.05). There were no differences in ST depression or elevation between the groups. The maximum ST changes compared with baseline values were not significant between the groups (conventional laryngoscopy group: 0.328 mm versus intubating laryngeal mask airway group: 0.357 mm; p = 0.754). The number and type of airway complications were similar between the groups. CONCLUSION: The intense and repeated oropharyngeal and tracheal stimulation resulting from intubating laryngeal mask airway induces greater pressor responses than does stimulation resulting from conventional laryngoscopy in hypertensive patients. As ST changes and upper airway morbidity are similar between the two techniques, conventional laryngoscopy, which is rapid and safe to perform, may be preferred in hypertensive patients with normal airways.

Unilateral vocal cord palsy occurred after difficult endotracheal intubation using intubating laryngeal mask airway: A case report / 대한마취과학회지

Airway management is important during general anesthesia. Difficulties with a direct laryngoscopy can be managed successfully in a routine manner using a laryngeal mask airway. A 65-year-old woman was scheduled to undergo gynecologic surgery. After injecting the intravenous induction agents and muscle relaxants, intubation was attempted with a direct laryngoscope. However, the vocal cords could not be observed with only the epiglottis being slightly visible. Although intubation was re-attempted by another anesthesiologist, it failed. Intubation was successfully performed via an intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) after additional 100% oxygen mask ventilation. We report a case of vocal cord palsy subsequent to tracheal extubation after endotracheal intubation via ILMA.

Airway Management of Patient with Ankylosing Spondylitis and Mental Retardation : A case report

Almost all anesthesiologists are encounter a difficult airway occasionally, which is probably the most important cause of anesthesia related morbidity and mortality. The Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA) is a modified laryngeal mask airway with the capability for guided tracheal intubation while maintaining ventilation. We report the successful use of this device in patient with ankylosing spondylitis, mental retardation and hearing disturbance. This case suggests that ILMA is a safe and useful method for airway management in anesthetic care of uncooperative patients.

Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway for Difficult Airway / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: Almost all anesthesiologists are encounter a difficult airway occasionally, which is probably the most important cause of anesthesia related morbidity and mortality. The intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA; FastarachTM; laryngeal mask company, Henley-on-Thames, UK) is a new device for tracheal intubation. It is an ideal rescue airway since it can be placed quickly and used as a conduit for endotracheal intubation, while ventilation is ongoing. This prospective study was underttaken from January, 1997 to December, 2004 to evaluate the appropriateness of the ILMA for anticipated or unanticipated difficult airways. METHODS: After institutional committee approval, seventy eight patients were enrolled in this study. The anticipated group compromised thirty five patients and the unanticipated group forty three. In the unanticipated group, anesthesia was induced with thiopental sodium and vecuronium and maintained with enflurane or isoflurane, whereas in the anticipated group, awake intubation with nerve block was done before intubation. The success of the technique (within five attempts), the number of attempts, the durations of the successful attempts, and adverse events (desaturation, bleeding) were recorded. RESULTS: The rate of successful tracheal intubation with ILMA was 92.7%. The numbers of attempts and the times to success were not significantly different between the two groups. Adverse events occurred significantly more frequently in the unanticipated group. Conclusion: The ILMA is a useful device for the management of patients with a difficult airway and may be a valuable alternative to direct laryngoscopy or fiberoptic intubation when neck movement is unfavorable or in those with an unanticipated difficult airway.

Comparative First Intubation Success Rates of Blind Orotracheal Intubation Using Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway with or without Handle Elevation / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: Elevation of intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) handle increase the efficacy of the seal by pressing the cuff more firmly into the periglottic tissues and many clinicians apply an upward force to ILMA handle during blind intubation. In this study, we compared the first intubation success rate through ILMA during intubation with or without handle elevation. METHODS: With informed consent, fifty adult patients of ASA physical status I or II were selected. After insertion of ILMA size 4, optimal ventilation was established by slightly rotating the device in the sagittal plane, using the metal handle, until the least resistance to bag ventilation is achieved. Ventilation grade and fiberoptic bronchoscopic view were evaluated at the proper position. Intubation using ILMA was limited to first attempt regardless of successful tracheal intubation. After intubated tube was removed, ILMA was slightly elevated away from the posterior pharyngeal wall using the metal handle, and ventilation grade with fiberoptic bronchoscopic view were evaluated, then intubation was proceeded. Success rates of both methods on the first attempt were calculated. RESULTS: Ventilation grade and fiberoptic bronchoscopic view had no significant differences under the intubation using ILMA with or without handle elevation. Success rates of intubation on the first attempt with and without handle elevation were 78% and 82%. Therefore both methods had no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Blind tracheal intubation using ILMA with handle elevation is not necessary to get higher intubation success rates on the first attempt. Finding proper ventilation position and technical experience are required for successful blind tracheal intubation using ILMA.

Comparison of Responses to Endotracheal Intubation Using an Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway according to the Insertion Time during Induction with Sevoflurane / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to compare responses to the insertion of an intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) and to the intubation of an endotracheal tube according to insertion time when used with sevoflurane and without muscle relaxant. METHODS: We used 50% N2O-O2-8% sevoflurane and a 10% topical lidocaine spray. Forty-eight patients were randomized into four groups according to insertion time (each, n = 12). The ILMA was inserted at 3, 4, 5, and 6 minutes after sevoflurane induction and intubation was performed at 1 minute after ILMA insertion. Responses to intubation, such as vital signs, jaw relaxation, coughing, biting, movements, and laryngospasm were compared according to ILMA insertion time. RESULTS: At 3 minutes, overall responses to insertion and intubation were worse than at 4, 5, and 6 minutes (P < 0.05). At 4, 5, and 6 minutes, responses to the insertion of the ILMA and the intubation of endotracheal tube were satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: Insertion of ILMA at 4 minutes after sevoflurane induction proved satisfactory, and this could be applied in clinical practice.

Submental Intubation with a Reinforced Tube for an Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA) / 대한마취과학회지

Nasotracheal intubation, when performed after craniomaxillofacial trauma, may result in the passage of the tube into the cranium, causing significant brain damage. Orotracheal intubation may be preferred, but interferes with the placement of intermaxillary fixation. To avoid these problems, a tracheostomy may be an alternative but it carries significant morbidity. The submental route for endotracheal intubation has been proposed as an alternative to a tracheostomy in the surgical management of craniomaxillofacial trauma. Ideally, this maneuver is performed by using a reinforced tube. Unfortunately, however, some reinforced tracheal tubes are manufactured with nondetachable connectors. Removing them forcefully may be possible, but they will then stay dangerously loose after reconnection. We report a case in which a standard oral Ring-Adair-Elwyn (RAE) tube and reinforced tube for ILMA was used so not to be loose after the reconnection.

A Successful Tracheostomy under General Anesthesia with Blind Intubation via ILMA in a Sitting Position / 대한마취과학회지

The intubating laryngeal masK airway is a newly available device designed to allow for blind endotracheal intubation and treatment of patients with difficult airways. Emergency tracheostomies are required for oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, and laryngeal tumors acutely obstructing the airway. Patients with an airway obstructive tumor maintain their airway by a very active inspiratory effort in a sitting position. In these patients, it may be impossible to position them for a tracheostomy with shoulder extension. We report a case where a patient was tracheostomized successfully under general anesthesia with blind intubation via ILMA insertion in a sitting position.

Intubating Layngeal Mask Airway in Awake Intubation / 대한마취과학회지

The incidence of difficult intubation varies from 1.5% to 13%, and failed intubation has been identified as one of the anesthesia-related causes of death or permanent brain damage. The Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA) is a new modified laryngeal mask airway with the capability for guided tracheal intubation while maintaining ventilation. The ILMA was designed to improve blind endotracheal intubation through a laryngeal mask airway. It does not require head and neck manipulations on insertion. The success rate of blind intubation using the ILMA was up to 99.3% in patients with or without airway problems. We experienced two cases of the difficult endotracheal intubation due to cervical spine 1 2 fractured 34 years old female patient and cervical spine 5 6 fractured 62 years old female patient were done successful awake airway management through the ILMA with superior laryngeal nerve block with pharyngeal and endotracheal topical spray of lidocaine. These cases suggest that awake tracheal intubations through the ILMA is a safe and useful method for airway management in anesthetic care of cervical spine fracture patients.

Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway in Difficult Intubation: A case report / 대한마취과학회지

The incidence of difficult laryngoscopy or intubation varies from 1.5% to 13%, and failed intubation has been identified as one of the anesthesia-related causes of death or permanent brain damage. The Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA) is a new modified laryngeal mask with the capability for guided tracheal intubation while maintaining ventilation. The ILMA was designed by Brain to improve blind endotracheal intubation through a laryngeal mask. We report the successful use of this device in two patients with difficult airway during induction of general anesthesia.

Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway in Difficult Intubation: A case report / 대한마취과학회지

The incidence of difficult laryngoscopy or intubation varies from 1.5% to 13%, and failed intubation has been identified as one of the anesthesia-related causes of death or permanent brain damage. The Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA) is a new modified laryngeal mask with the capability for guided tracheal intubation while maintaining ventilation. The ILMA was designed by Brain to improve blind endotracheal intubation through a laryngeal mask. We report the successful use of this device in two patients with difficult airway during induction of general anesthesia.