Effect Of Preheating On Surface Roughness And Microhardness Of A Nanohybrid Composite Resin - An In Vitro Study

Introduction: The success of dental composites in restorative dentistry stems from their good aesthetic properties andadequate durability. The clinical performance of composite resins is directly related to the degree of monomer conversion afterphoto polymerization. Placing composites at an elevated temperature reduce their viscosity and increase the efficiency ofpolymerization. Heating the composite prior to placement in the cavity increases monomer conversion rate and therefore theduration of the irradiation period may be reduced.Purpose of Study: Evaluate and compare effect of pre-heating on surface roughness and microhardness of nanohybrid compositeresin subjected to two different temperatures and two different durations using light emitting diode curing unit (LED LCU).Methods: Nanohybrid composite resin was tested at two temperatures (37°C and 55°C) and pre-heating of composite wasdone using incubator at two durations (10 and 20 minutes) respectively. Samples were injected into cylindrical Teflon molds andthe top surface of the specimens were polymerized using LED LCU for 40 s. After preservation for 24 h, specimens checkedfor surface roughness and Vickers hardness measurements. Statistical analysis were performed using one-way analysis ofvariance and Tukey post hoc test at a level of significance of P < 0.05 for both surface roughness and microhardness.Results: Pre-heating of composite affect on microhardness and did not influence on surface roughness.Conclusion: Pre-heating of resin composite increases microhardness and no significant effect on roughness.

Power density of light curing units through resin inlays fabricated with direct and indirect composites / 대한치과보존학회지

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to measure the power density of light curing units transmitted through resin inlays fabricated with direct composite (Filtek Z350, Filtek Supreme XT) and indirect composite (Sinfony). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A3 shade of Z350, A3B and A3E shades of Supreme XT, and A3, E3, and T1 shades of Sinfony were used to fabricate the resin inlays in 1.5 mm thickness. The power density of a halogen light curing unit (Optilux 360) and an LED light curing unit (Elipar S10) through the fabricated resin inlays was measured with a hand held dental radiometer (Cure Rite). To investigate the effect of each composite layer consisting the resin inlays on light transmission, resin specimens of each shade were fabricated in 0.5 mm thickness and power density was measured through the resin specimens. RESULTS: The power density through the resin inlays was lowest with the Z350 A3, followed by Supreme XT A3B and A3E. The power density was highest with Sinfony A3, E3, and T1 (p < 0.05). The power density through 0.5 mm thick resin specimens was lowest with dentin shades, Sinfony A3, Z350 A3, Supreme XT A3B, followed by enamel shades, Supreme XT A3E and Sinfony E3. The power density was highest with translucent shade, Sinfony T1 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Using indirect lab composites with dentin, enamel, and translucent shades rather than direct composites with one or two shades could be advantageous in transmitting curing lights through resin inlays.