The use of intraoperative mannitol during the laparoscopic nephrectomy in living kidney donor and the prevention of delayed graft function / Uso de manitol intraoperatorio durante la nefrectomía por laparoscopia en donante vivo de riñón y la prevención de función retardada del injerto

Background and objectives: The administration of mannitol during laparoscopic hand-assisted nephrectomy in the living donor has been controversial with various recommendations about it. This study aims to evaluate the effect of the intraoperative mannitol in the living kidney donor and the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF). Methods: This study was a retrospective observational study with living kidney transplant recipients and donors who underwent laparoscopic hand-assisted nephrectomy at Colombiana de Trasplantes from January 2015 to September 2019. We assessed the impact of mannitol administration in living donors on the main transplant outcomes such as DGF, urinary volume, acute rejection, and mortality at 3 months of follow-up. We performed a descriptive analysis of demographics and clinical variables in our cohort. Results: A total of 367 recipients were evaluated. The incidence of DGF was 5.9% without mannitol versus 6.2% with mannitol (p = 0.99). The acute rejection episodes (12.2% without mannitol versus 4.7% with mannitol) had a trend difference between the comparative groups, but it was still not significant in the bivariate analysis (p = 0.06). The mortality rate in the recipient was not significant (p = 0.69). The mean serum creatinine did not have significant differences at 1 and 3 months of follow-up comparing both groups. Conclusion: The use of mannitol in living donors does not have a significant impact on the incidence of DGF in kidney recipients. A trend of association between mannitol administration and reduced acute rejection episodes was observed, though it was not statistically significant.

Antecedentes y objetivo: La administración de manitol durante la nefrectomía laparoscópica en el donante vivo ha sido discutida con diversas recomendaciones. El objetivo es evaluar la administración de manitol intraoperatorio en el donante vivo de riñón y la incidencia de función retardada del injerto en el receptor. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo con receptores de riñón y donantes vivos que tuvieron nefrectomía laparoscópica en Colombiana de Trasplantes entre enero de 2015 a septiembre de 2019. Evaluamos el impacto de administrar manitol en los principales desenlaces del trasplante: función retardada del injerto, volumen urinario, rechazo agudo y mortalidad del receptor a los 3 meses post-trasplante. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo de las características demográficas y clínicas. Resultados: Se evaluaron 367 receptores con una incidencia de función retardada del injerto de 5.9% sin manitol versus 6.2% con manitol (p = 0,99), el rechazo agudo (12,2% sin manitol versus 4,7% con manitol) tuvo una tendencia de diferencia entre ambos grupos no significativa (p = 0,06) y la mortalidad del receptor tampoco mostró diferencias significativas (p = 0,69). La media de creatinina sérica al mes y 3 meses no tuvo diferencias significativas en los grupos. Conclusión: El uso de manitol en los donantes vivos de riñón no impactó significativamente la incidencia de función retardada del injerto en los receptores de trasplante. Se encontró una tendencia de asociación en la administración de manitol intraoperatorio y la reducción de los episodios de rechazo agudo al tercer mes post-trasplante en los receptores. No obstante, esta tendencia no tuvo la suficiente relevancia estadística.

A Analysis of evaluation for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation by Academic and Ethics Committee for Organ Transplantation / 中国医学伦理学

Objective: To give the living-donor and recipient medical evaluation and moral evaluation pretransplant by Academic and Ethics Committee for Organ Transplantation (AECOT), ensure the transplantation proceed smoothly and the feasibility for moral principles. Methods:AECOT was formed and gave the living-donor and recipient medical evaluation, additional moral evaluation to their family, evaluated the possibility for transplantation, ensured the long-dated safety for living-donor and recognition for ethics, ensured the transplantation proceed successfully. Results: 18 cases were evaluated by AECOT, two cases had the operation refused because of the II-diabetes for one living-donor and the other living-donor refused evaluation, one case had the operation delaied because of the overweight for the living-donor. The rest 15 cases were accepted operation smoothly,both donor and recipient recovered well post transplant. Conclusion:Academic and Ethics Committee for Organ Transplantation(AECOT) is a essential agency for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation.