Analysis of Positive Results in Mediace Rapid Plasma Reagin and Treponema pallidum Latex Agglutination at a University Hospital / 임상검사와정도관리

BACKGROUND: We analyzed the positive rates of Mediace Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) (Sekisui, Japan) and Mediace Treponema pallidum Latex Agglutination (TPLA) (Sekisui) assays. Positive results were compared to those of immunochromatography assay (ICA) and fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption (FTA-ABS) tests. METHODS: We used samples of patients visited at a university hospital from April 2010 to May 2011. The rates of positive results were calculated with 36,343 RPR results and 5,934 TPLA results. In addition, 237 positive samples with Mediace RPR or TPLA were re-tested with ICA and FTA-ABS. Mediace RPR and TPLA tests were performed with Toshiba 200-FR Neo (Toshiba, Japan). RESULTS: The rates of positive results were 0.47% (169/36,343) and 3.52% (209/5,934) with RPR and TPLA, respectively. Among the 237 sera that tested positive with RPR or TPLA, 76 were RPR(+)/TPLA(+), 28 were RPR(+)/TPLA(-), and 133 were RPR(-)/TPLA(+). When compared to the ICA results, 86.84% (66/76) of the RPR(+)/TPLA(+) sera were ICA(+), 3.57% (1/28) of the RPR(+)/TPLA(-) sera were ICA(+), and 54.89% (73/133) of the RPR(-)/TPLA(+) sera were ICA(+). Only 67.11% of the TPLA(+) sera demonstrated positive FTA-ABS results. However, 100% of the TPLA(-) sera yielded negative FTA-ABS results. ICA and FTA-ABS had a 96.59% positive agreement rate and an 80.68% negative agreement rate. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that Mediace TPLA has a low positive agreement rate with FTA-ABS. Although Mediace RPR and TPLA have advantages associated with automated methods, positive results should be confirmed with other treponemal tests, due to the high false positive rates.

Evaluation of Performance and False Positivity of Mediace RPR Test that Uses a Chemistry Autoanalyzer / 대한진단검사의학회지

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the performance and false positive rate of Mediace RPR test (Sekisui, Japan), a newly introduced nontreponemal test using a chemistry autoanalyzer. METHODS: The sensitivity of Mediace RPR test was analyzed using sera from 50 patients with syphilis in different stages (8 primary, 7 secondary, and 35 latent), 14 sera positive with fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption (FTA-ABS) IgM, and 74 sera positive with conventional rapid plasma regain (RPR) card test (Asan, Korea) and also positive with Treponema pallidum hemagglutination (TPHA) test or FTA-ABS IgG test. The specificity was analyzed on 108 healthy blood donors. We also performed RPR card test on 302 sera that had been tested positive with Mediace RPR test and also performed TPHA or FTA-ABS IgG test to analyze the false positive rate of Mediace RPR test. A cutoff value of 0.5 R.U. (RPR unit) was used for Mediace RPR test. RESULTS: Mediace RPR test on syphilitic sera of different stages (primary, secondary, and latent stages) and FTA-ABS IgM positive sera showed a sensitivity of 100%, 100%, 82.9% and 100%, respectively. Among the 74 sera positive with conventional RPR card test and TPHA or FTA-ABS IgG test, 55 were positive with Mediace test. The specificity of Mediace RPR test on blood donors was 97.2%. Among the 302 sera positive with Mediace RPR test, 137 sera (45.4%) were negative by RPR card and TPHA/FTA-ABS IgG tests. CONCLUSIONS: Although the sensitivities of Mediace RPR were good for primary and secondary syphilis, due to its high negative rate of Mediace RPR over the conventional RPR positive samples, further studies are necessary whether it can replace conventional nontreponemal test for screening purpose. Moreover, in view of the high false positive rate, positive results by Mediace RPR test should be confirmed with treponemal tests.

Analysis of Positive Results in Mediace Rapid Plasma Reagin and Treponema pallidum Latex Agglutination as the Automated Syphilis Test / 대한진단검사의학회지

BACKGROUND: We compared the results of automated and quantitative methods for the diagnosis of syphilis, Mediace Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) and Mediace Treponema pallidum Latex Agglutination (TPLA) (Sekisui Chemical Co., Ltd, Japan) with those of conventional methods. METHODS: Sera from 3,896 persons who had health checkups between December 2005 and November 2006 were included in the evaluation of positive rates and biological false positives (BFP) for Mediace RPR and TPLA. In addition, 134 patients' sera positive for automated Mediace RPR or TPLA were tested for VDRL and TPHA. Discrepancies between TPLA and TPHA results were confirmed by the RecomBlot Treponemal IgG/IgM (Mikrogen GmbH, Germany). Automated Mediace RPR and TPLA were performed using the Hitachi 7600 chemistry autoanalyzer (Hitachi, Japan). Samples with positive Mediace RPR and negative TPLA results were defined as BFP. RESULTS: Positive rate of automated Mediace RPR was 0.23% (9/3,896). BFP of the Mediace RPR was 0.18%. Positive rate of automated TPLA was 1.62% (37/2,284). Among the 134 patients' sera, 33 (24.6%) showed a discrepancy between conventional VDRL and automated Mediace RPR results: Among 31 Mediace RPR(+)/VDRL(-) sera, 13 were positive and 18 were negative for TPLA. The remaining 2 sera of discrepancy with Mediace RPR(-)/VDRL(+) were all positive for TPLA. There were seven sera that showed a discrepancy between automated TPLA and TPHA results: Two sera with Mediace RPR(+)/TPLA(-)/TPHA(+) showed negative recomBlot Treponemal IgG/IgM results, and among five sera with TPLA(+)/TPHA(-), three demonstrated IgG or IgM by recomBlot Treponemal IgG/IgM. CONCLUSIONS: The results of comparison data demonstrated that automated TPLA results had a high concordance with recomBlot Treponemal IgG/IgM results. Moreover, there are additional advantages of automated methods such as quantitative detection, low infection risk, and no influence by human handling.

Serologic Test for Syphilis by Mediace RPR Test for Chemistry Autoanalyzer / 임상검사와정도관리

BACKGROUND: Mediace RPR test for chemistry autoanalyzer, a nontreponemal serologic test for syphilis, was recently introduced in Korea. We evaluated the performance of Mediace RPR test. METHODS: For the evaluation of precision, within-run and total coefficient variations were analyzed. Two hundred and one sera were tested by Mediace RPR test to investigate the distribution of Mediace RPR titers in healthy subjects. Mediace RPR test was compared with RPR card test using 126 sera. RESULTS: Total coefficient variations for positive control, negative control and pooled sera were 9.1%, 46.6% and 35.3%, respectively. The results of Mediace RPR test in healthy subjects showed 0.44+/-0.28 (mean+/-standard deviation) RPR unit (RU), and the positive rate was 3.5% (7/201). The agreement between Mediace RPR test and RPR card test was 73%. In some of the sera with a result of greater than 4.0 RU, Mediace RPR test showed markedly lower results than that of RPR card quantitative test. CONCLUSION: Mediace RPR test has the advantages that it is useful for screening large number of samples and the results are objective. Mediace RPR test can be used as a quantitative test in sera with low titers. Dilution is needed to determine high titers in sera. Adjusting cutoff for the setting of individual hospital is maybe helpful.