Résumé
This study aimed to establish a new technology for health insurance reimbursement evidence-based decision-making framework on the basis of EVIDEM. Literature review,focus group discussion and qualitative inter-view were used to construct the preliminary decision-making framework,and expert consultation was adopted to deter-mine the necessity and weight of the criteria. The established evidence-based decision-making framework consists of guidelines of normative universal and contextual aspects. The normative aspect included following criteria, need for intervention (i.e. disease severity, size of affected population, benefit type of technology, unmet needs of reim-bursed technology),comparative outcomes of technology (i.e. comparative effectiveness,comparative safety/tolera-bility,comparative patient-perceived/patient-reported outcomes), and economic consequences of technology (i.e. cost,results of economic evaluation). The contextual aspect reflects the mission and mandate of medical insurance, population priorities and the accessibility,common goal and specific interests, political context, and affordability of medical insurance.
Résumé
<b>Background:</b> This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between disease type and healthcare-seeking behavior in patients in order to assess the role of primary care in rural areas of Japan.<br><b>Methods:</b> National Health Insurance receipt data were collected for outpatients from four towns in Hokkaido, Japan. Disease names were encoded using the International Classification of Primary Care-2 (ICPC-2) coding system. Patient data were divided into two categories: those visiting medical facilities in their own towns and those visiting medical facilities in other towns.<br><b>Results:</b> The percentage of patients who visited medical facilities outside their own town ranged from 42.9% to 72.7%; the mean value for all four towns was 54.6%. The three most frequent ICPC-2 codes according to the reimbursement receipts were K86 (hypertension, uncomplicated), T93 (lipid disorder), and T90 (diabetes, noninsulin dependent), and patients with T90 visited facilities in other towns more than those with K86 and T93. Patients with diseases of the eye, such as F91 (refractive error), F92 (cataract), and F71 (allergic conjunctivitis), and those with psychological disorders, such as P76 (depressive disorder), tended to visit facilities outside their towns rather than in their own towns.<br><b>Conclusions:</b> Data regarding patients who visit medical facilities in their own towns may provide information on the role of primary care in that particular town. The analysis of medical reimbursement receipts from a particular area provides useful information about disease distribution in addition to an overview of the healthcare needs of the entire community in that area.
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to be evaluated the adequacy on DRG classification in Obstetric group and analyzed the difference for medical benefit payment from the insurance and total medical reimbursement according to complication and age in vaginal delivery group and Cesarean section group. METHODS: This study has been analyzed for medical benefit payment from the insurance and total medical reimbursement of patients from University of hospital since Feburary 1999 to December 2000 and the data from Health Insurance Review Agency since Feburary 2001 to July 2001. RESULTS: Since these cases were not reported even 1 case in Korea, there were 113 cases needed to be deleted in DRG classification disease group. In the evaluation of disease severity for DRG classification disease group, there were 11 cases should be added to severe complicating diagnosis, 5 cases should be removed from severe complicating diagnosis, and 6 cases should be added to moderate complicating diagnosis in vaginal delivery and Cesarean section group. Medical benefit payment from the insurance and total medical reimbursement in the group with having severe complication were significantly higher than in the group without complication in Cesarean section group. Medical benefit payment from the insurance and total medical reimbursement in the group with having severe complication in primigravida vaginal delivery group and the group with having severe complication in multigravida vaginal delivery group were significantly higher in the group without complication in primigravida vaginal delivery group and the group without complication in multigravida vaginal delivery group, separately. CONCLUSION: Severity classification system-severe complication, multiple complication, moderate complication, non-complication-should be included in obstetric DRG classification system.