Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 1 de 1
Filtre
1.
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine ; : 629-637, 2015.
Article Dans Anglais | WPRIM | ID: wpr-216628

Résumé

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In assigning patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to subgroups according to the updated guidelines of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease, discrepancies have been noted between the COPD assessment test (CAT) criteria and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) criteria. We investigated the determinants of symptom and risk groups and sought to identify a better CAT criterion. METHODS: This retrospective study included COPD patients seen between June 20, 2012, and December 5, 2012. The CAT score that can accurately predict an mMRC grade > or = 2 versus or = 15 predicted an mMRC grade > or = 2 more accurately than the current CAT score criterion. During follow-up, patients with CAT scores of 10 to 14 did not have a different risk of exacerbation versus those with CAT scores or = 15 is a better indicator for the 'more symptoms group' in the management of COPD patients.


Sujets)
Sujet âgé , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Algorithmes , Aire sous la courbe , Techniques d'aide à la décision , Arbres de décision , Poumon/physiopathologie , Valeur prédictive des tests , Broncho-pneumopathie chronique obstructive/classification , Courbe ROC , Analyse de régression , Reproductibilité des résultats , République de Corée , Études rétrospectives , Facteurs de risque , Indice de gravité de la maladie
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
Détails de la recherche