RÉSUMÉ
The positioning of pods in common bean directly affects grain losses in mechanized harvesting. However, only few studies have assessed facttors that can affect pods positioning. The objective of this work was to determine the effect of plant density, nitrogen fertilization, and fertilization depth on the distribution of pods of the common bean. The field experiments were carried out in two cropping seasons, 2017 and 2018, during the winter period in the Cerrado region. The experimental design was randomized blocks in a 4x2 factorial scheme, with four replications. The treatments consisted of the combination of four sowing densities (5, 10, 15, and 20 plants m-1) with two depths of fertilizer application (6 and 12 cm). The results allowed inferring that the depth of the fertilization does not affect the distribution of pods in the common bean. Plant density does not affect common bean grain yield. More than a quarter of the common bean pods of the BRS FC104 are positioned close to the ground, below 100 mm, in the area where harvester machines operate. Nitrogen fertilization and plant density affect the distribution of pods in common bean plants. At higher doses of N (90 kg ha-1), plant density should be increased. On the other hand, at lower doses (45 kg ha-1), plant density must be reduced. It is concluded that the sowing density can be an efficient strategy to provide the highest positioning of pods in the upper part of the common bean plants, reducing harvest loss.
RÉSUMÉ
Urea is the most used N fertilizer for upland rice, however, a great percentage of N loss can occur with the use of this fertilizer. The use of products that provide reduction of N loss for urea fertilizers can contribute to increase N use efficiency. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of N rates applied in the form of coated urea in the content and accumulation of N in dry biomass, apparent recovery of nitrogen and grain yield of upland rice. The experimental design was a randomized complete blocks arranged in a 4 x 3 + 1 factorial scheme. The treatments consisted of four sources of N fertilizer [1. Common urea; 2. Polymer-coated urea for slow release of N (PCU); 3. urea with the urease inhibitor N-(n-Butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT); and 4. urea coated with copper sulfate and boric acid as urease inhibitors (UCCB)], with three fertilization rates (30, 60 and 90 kg ha-1 of N). In addition, we included a control treatment without N application. Coated urea did not provide increases in rice grain yield in relation to common urea. The increasing amount of N resulted in significant increases in rice grain yield (from 3217 to 5548 kg ha-1, 2010/11, and from 3392 to 4560 kg ha-1, 2011/12). The apparent nitrogen recovery rate decreased with the increase in N applied doses.
A ureia é o fertilizante nitrogenado mais utilizado para o arroz de terras altas, no entanto, esse fertilizante tem grande percentual de perda de N. O uso de produtos que proporcionam redução da perda de N em fertilizantes com ureia pode contribuir para aumentar a eficiência de uso do nitrogênio. O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar o efeito de doses de N aplicadas na forma de ureia encapsulada no teor e acúmulo de N na biomassa seca, recuperação aparente de nitrogênio e produtividade de grãos de arroz de terras altas. O delineamento experimental foi em blocos ao acaso no esquema fatorial 4 x 3 + 1. Os tratamentos consistiram de quatro fontes de N fertilizante [1. ureia tradicional; 2. Polímero de ureia revestida para liberação lenta de N (PCU); 3. ureia com o inibidor de urease N- (n-butil) triamida tiofosfórico (NBPT); e 4. ureia revestida com sulfato de cobre e ácido bórico como inibidores de urease (UCCB)], com três doses de fertilizante (30, 60 e 90 kg ha-1 de N). Além disso, incluímos uma testemunha sem aplicação de N. Ureia revestida não forneceu aumentos no rendimento de grãos de arroz em relação à ureia comum. O aumento da quantidade de N resultou em aumentos significativos no rendimento de grãos de arroz (de 3217 para 5548 kg ha-1, 2010/11, e de 3392 para 4560 kg ha-1, 2011/12). A taxa de recuperação aparente de nitrogênio diminuiu com o aumento das doses aplicadas de N.