Negative pressure irrigation presents mineralizing potential in dogs' immature teeth with periapical lesion

Abstract The objective of this in vivo study was to assess the effect of the root canal irrigation by negative and positive apical pressure on the expression of molecules that are an indicative of cell differentiation with mineralizing phenotype in teeth of dogs with incomplete rhizogenesis and induced periapical lesion. A total of 30 teeth (60 roots) were distributed into 3 groups (n=20): EndoVac®, Conventional and Control. After 90 days, the routine histotechnical procedures were performed and the sections were submitted to immunohistochemical technique for the staining of osteopontin (OPN), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and the RUNX2 transcription factor in the apical and periapical regions of the roots. A semi-quantitative analysis of the positive immunostaining was performed and the intensity of the expression was classified in absent (0), mild (1), moderate (2), or intense (3). Scores data were statistically analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test and Dunn post-test, and the significance level was set at 5%. RUNX2 immunostaining revealed that in the negative pressure group there was a significantly stronger (p<0.05) immunostaining in comparison to the control group. Regarding the OPN expression, it was not possible to detect a statistically significant difference between the groups (p>0.05). After analyzing ALP immunostaining, a statistically significant difference was observed between the groups (p<0.05), and the negative pressure group showed a markedly stronger mark immunostaining than the control group. The results of the present in vivo study allowed concluding that negative apical pressure irrigation presents mineralizing potential in immature teeth with apical periodontitis.

Resumo O objetivo do presente estudo in vivo foi avaliar o efeito da irrigação do canal radicular por pressão apical negativa e por pressão positiva na expressão de moléculas que são indicativas de diferenciação celular com fenótipo mineralizador em dentes de cães com rizogênese incompleta e lesão periapical. Um total de 30 dentes (60 raízes) foi distribuído em 3 grupos (n=20): EndoVac, Convencional e Controle. Após 30 dias, foram realizados os procedimentos histotécnicos de rotina e os cortes foram submetidos à técnica de imunohistoquímica para marcação de Osteopontina (OPN), Fosfatase Alcalina (ALP) e para o fator de transcrição RUNX2 nas regiões apical e periapical das raízes. Foi realizada uma análise semi-quantitativa da imunomarcação positiva e a intensidade da expressão foi classificada em ausente (0), leve (1), moderada (2) ou intensa (3). Os dados por escores foram analisados estatisticamente pelo teste não-paramétrico de Kruskal-Wallis e pelo pós-teste de Dunn, e o nível de significância adotado foi de 5%. A imunumarcação para RUNX2 revelou que no grupo pessão negativa houve marcação significativamente mais intensa (p<0,05), em comparação ao grupo controle. Com relação à expressão de OPN, não foi possível observer diferença estatisticamente significante entre os grupos (p>0,05). Após análise da imunomarcação para ALP, foi observado diferença estatisticamente significante entre os grupos (p<0,05), e o grupo pressão negativa demonstrou uma marcação siginificativamente mais intensa do que o grupo controle. Os resultados do presente estudo in vivo permitiram concluir que a irrigação por pressão apical negativa apresenta potencial mineralizador em dentes com ápice aberto e lesão periapical.

Radiographic and immunohistochemical evaluation of root canal treatment using different irrigation systems

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiographic periapical repair and the synthesis of inflammatory mediators after endodontic treatment in a single session, using different irrigation protocols, in teeth with apical periodontitis. Experimental apical periodontitis were induced in dog's teeth randomly assigned into 4 groups: G1 - Irrigation by Negative Apical Pressure (n= 20); G2 - Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (n= 20), G3 - Positive Pressure Irrigation (n= 20); G4 - apical periodontitis without treatment (n= 20). After 180 days, the animals were euthanized, the tissues removed and submitted to histotechnical processing for immunohistochemical analysis of osteopontin (OPN), tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a) and interleukin 1-a (IL-1a). Radiographic analysis was performed using the Periapical Index (PAI), obtained prior to and 180 days following endodontic treatment. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Fisher's Exact test or Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's post-test (a = 5%). Radiographically, after endodontic treatment, apical periodontitis persisted in 35% of G1 specimens, 40% of G2 and 40% of G3 (p>0.05), although a PAI reduction was observed (p<0.05). By immunohistochemical evaluation, endodontic treatment resulted in lower synthesis of TNF-a and OPN in periapical region, compared to apical periodontitis without treatment (p<0.05). Production of IL-1 was not modulated by endodontic treatment (p>0.05). Periapical healing was observed in approximately 60% of the cases after endodontic treatment performed in a single session with lower synthesis of TNF-a and OPN in the periapical region, regardless of the irrigation protocol used.

Resumo O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o reparo periapical e a síntese de mediadores inflamatórios após tratamento endodôntico em dentes de cães com lesão periapical, em sessão única, utilizando diferentes protocolos de irrigação. Lesões periapicais foram induzidas experimentalmente em dentes de cães e aleatoriamente divididas em 4 grupos: G1 - Irrigação por Pressão Apical Negativa (n = 20); G2 - Irrigação Ultrassônica Passiva (n = 20), G3 - Irrigação por Pressão Positiva (n = 20); G4 - Lesão periapical sem tratamento (n = 20). Após 180 dias, os animais foram eutanasiados, as peças removidas e submetidas ao processamento histotécnico para análise imunohistoquímica para osteopontina (OPN), fator de necrose tumoral-a (TNF-a) e interleucina 1-a (IL-1a). A análise radiográfica do reparo das lesões periapicais foi realizada por meio do Índice Periapical, obtido antes e 180 dias após o tratamento endodôntico. Os resultados obtidos foram submetidos à análise estatística por meio dos testes de sinais de Wilcoxon, Exato de Fisher ou Kruskal-Wallis seguido pelo pós-teste de Dunn (a = 5%). O exame radiográfico após o tratamento endodôntico, mostrou a persistência de áreas radiolúcidas periapicais e descontinuidade da lâmina dura em 35% dos espécimes do G1, 40% do G2 e 40% do G3, embora uma redução no PAI tenha sido observada (p<0,05). Pela análise imuno-histoquímica, o tratamento endodôntico resultou na menor síntese de TNF-a e de OPN na região periapical, comparativamente à lesão periapical sem tratamento (p<0,05). A produção de IL-1a não foi modulada pelo tratamento endodôntico (p>0,05). Reparo da lesão periapical foi observado em cerca de 60% dos casos após tratamento endodôntico realizado em sessão única e menor síntese de TNF-a e de OPN na região periapical, independente do protocolo de irrigação utilizado.

Application of closed negative pressure irrigation and suction device in the treatment of high perianal abscess / 中华胃肠外科杂志

Objective@#To explore the efficacy of closed negative pressure irrigation and suction device (Patent number: Z200780013509.8) in the treatment of high perianal abscess.@*Methods@#From January 2015 to December 2016, ≥18-year-old patients with primary high perianal abscess who were treated at our department were prospectively enrolled. Exclusion criteria: (1) recurrent perianal abscess; (2) complicated with anal fistula formation; (3) preoperative, intraoperative or postoperative physical therapy, and curettage treatment, negative pressure irrigation; (4) Crohn′s disease-related perianal abscess; (5) with immunosuppressive status, such as transplant recipients; (6) co-existence of malignant tumors, such as leukemia; (7) with diabetes; (8) those who could not receive long-term follow-up and were not suitable to participate in this study. According to the random number table method, the patients were randomly divided into negative pressure irrigation and suction group and routine drainage group. All patients were clearly diagnosed and the location and size of the perianal abscess were marked before surgery. These two groups were treated as follows: (1) Negative pressure irrigation and suction group: the skin was incised at a diameter of 1-2 cm at the site where the abscess fluctuated most obviously. After the abscess was removed, a closed negative pressure irrigation and suction device was installed and the pressure of -200 to -100 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) was maintained to keep the abscess cavity collapsed. Generally, the irrigation was stopped 5 days later or when the drainage was clear. The closed vacuum suction was maintained for 2 additional days, before the wound was sutured. (2) Conventional drainage group: conventional incision and drainage was carried out. The skin was cut at a diameter of 8 to 10 cm at the site of abscess with most obvious fluctuation. After the abscess was removed, normal saline gauze was used for dressing. Dressing was changed regularly until the wound healed. The efficacy, operative time, intraoperative bleeding, incision length, frequency of dressing change, pain index (visual analogue score, VAS score), postoperative healing time, complications, recurrence rate of perianal abscess, anal fistula formation rate were observed. The t test and χ2 test were used for comparison between the 2 groups.@*Results@#There were both 40 patients in the negative pressure irrigation and suction group and the conventional drainage group. There were 28 males and 12 females in negative pressure irrigation and suction group with a mean age of (38.3±12.0) years and mean disease course of (6.6±2.1) days. The abscess in pelvic-rectal space accounted for 50.0% (20/40) and the mean diameter of abscess was (8.0±3.7) cm. There were 26 males and 14 females in the conventional drainage group with a mean age of (37.1±11.8) years and mean disease course of (6.4±2.5) days. The abscess in pelvic-rectal space accounted for 55.0% (22/40) and the diameter of abscess was (8.2±3.5) cm. The differences in baseline data between two groups were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). Both groups successfully completed the operation. There was no significant difference in operative time between two groups (P>0.05). As compared to conventional drainage group, intraoperative blood loss in negative pressure irrigation and suction group was less [(12.1±5.5) ml vs. (18.3±4.4) ml, t=5.606, P<0.001], incision length was shorter [(2.3±0.8) cm vs. (7.6±1.7) cm, t=17.741, P<0.001], postoperative VAS pain scores at 1-, 3-, 7-, and 14-day after operation were lower [3.7±1.4 vs. 7.6±1.8, t=10.816, P<0.001; 3.0±1.3 vs. 6.8±1.6, t=11.657, P<0.001; 2.7±0.9 vs. 5.1±1.1, t=10.679, P<0.001; 1.2±0.3 vs. 1.6±0.4, t=5.060, P=0.019], the dressing change within 7 days after operation was less (3.5±1.2 vs. 12.6±2.7, t=19.478, P<0.001), postoperative healing time was shorter [(10.4±3.0) d vs. (13.5±3.8) d, t=4.049, P<0.001] and postoperative complication rate was lower [17.5% (7/40) vs. 2.5% (1/40), χ2=5.000, P=0.025]. During follow-up of 12 to 36 (24±5) months, the recurrence rate of perianal abscess within 1 year after operation and anal fistula formation rate in negative pressure irrigation and suction group were lower than those in conventional drainage group [5.0% (2/40) vs. 20.0% (8/40), χ2=4.114, P=0.042 and 2.5% (1/40) vs. 17.5% (7/40), χ2=5.000, P=0.025, respectirely]. The one-time cure rate of negative pressure irrigation and suction group and conventional drainage group was 92.5% (37/40) and 62.5%(25/40), respectirely (χ2=10.323, P=0.001).@*Conclusions@#The application of the negative pressure irrigation and suction device in the treatment of high perianal abscess can improve the efficiency of one-time cure, reduce postoperative pain, accelerate healing time, decrease the morbidity of postoperative complication and the rates of abscess recurrence and anal fistula formation, indicating an improvement of the treatment.

Continuous negative pressure irrigation and endoscopic debridement in treating patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis / 中华胰腺病杂志

Objective To observe the clinical outcomes and safety of continuous negative pressure irrigation (NPI) and endoscopic necrosectomy(ED) for treating infected pancreatic necrosis(IPN). Methods A retrospective review of the data of 163 severe acute pancreatitis(SAP) patients with IPN who were treated by four-step drainage from January 2012 to December 2013 at the SAP therapy center of Nanjing General Hospital was performed. All patients were divided into 7 groups including PCD alone, PCD+NPI, PCD+NPI+ED, PCD+ON, PCD +NPI +ON, PCD +ED +ON and PCD +NPI +ED +ON group based on the drainage strategy of percutaneous catheter drainage(PCD),NPI, ED and open necrosectomy(ON), and the feasibility and safety were analyzed. Results All the patients underwent PCD therapy. Each patient underwent a median of 3 drainage procedures and the median total drainage duration was 11 days. No significant procedure-related complication was observed. Around 40% of the patients recovered after receiving PCD alone. Thirty-four patients(20.9%) underwent ON. The mean hospitalization duration was 38 days and the mean ICU stay was 19 days. There were 25 cases with new-onset organ functional failure,26 patients with sepsis,32 patients with gastric and intestinal fistula,34 patients with intra-abdominal bleeding,8 patients with portal vein thrombosis and 3 patients with gastric outlet obstruction. 28 patients(17.2%) died. Conclusions This four-step approach is effective in treating IPN when compared with other step-up strategies. NPI and ED could offer distinct clinical efficacy without adding no extra risk to patients.

Apical Negative Pressure irrigation presents tissue compatibility in immature teeth

Abstract Aim: To compare the apical negative pressure irrigation (ANP) with conventional irrigation in the teeth of immature dogs with apical periodontitis. Methods: Fifty-two immature pre-molar root canals were randomly assigned into 4 groups: ANP (n=15); conventional irrigation (n=17); healthy teeth (control) (n = 10); and teeth with untreated apical periodontitis (control) (n=10). After induction of apical periodontitis, teeth were instrumented using EndoVac® (apical negative pressure irrigation) or conventional irrigation. The animals were euthanized after 90 days. The sections were stained by HE and analyzed under conventional and fluorescence microscopy. TRAP histoenzymology was also performed. Statistical analyses were performed with the significance level set at 5%. Results: There was difference in the histopathological parameters between ANP and conventional groups (p<0.05). The ANP group showed a predominance of low magnitude inflammatory infiltrate, a smaller periodontal ligament, and lower mineralized tissue resorption. There were no differences in the periapical lesion extensions between the ANP and conventional groups (p>0.05). However, a lower number of osteoclasts was observed in the ANP group (p<0.05). Conclusion: The EndoVac® irrigation system presented better biological results and more advanced repair process in immature teeth with apical periodontitis than the conventional irrigation system, confirming the hypothesis.

Evaluación de la extrusión del agente irrigante de acuerdo a la técnica de irrigación en dientes humanos, ex vivo / Irrigant extrusion according to irrigation technique inhuman teeth, ex vivo

El agente irrigante debería alcanzar la totalidad del conducto radicular, inclusive las zonas más apicales, para mejor la limpieza y desinfección. Sin embargo existe el riesgo de la extrusión del mismo a los tejidos periapicales. El presente estudio con diseño experimental tuvo el objetivo de evaluar la extrusión apical del agente irrigante endodóntico de acuerdo a la técnica de irrigación durante la irrigación final en dientes naturales, ex vivo. Se utilizaron 46 dientes anterosuperiores naturales extraídos con conducto único y las raíces se sumergieron en una gelatina conductora incolora. Una aguja de irrigación/aspiración fue colocada a 2 mm de la longitud de trabajo y se irrigaron los conductos con una solución de contraste a 4 ml/min durante 60 s. En 18 dientes se utilizó la técnica de irrigación por jeringa y en los 18 restantes se utilizó la técnica por presión negativa. Los controles positivos y negativos estaban compuestos por 5 dientes cada uno. Se evaluaron presencia y área de extrusión. La prueba Chi2 encontró una asociación estadísticamente significativa (p <0,001) entre la presencia de extrusión y la técnica de irrigación. El área mediana de extrusión provocada por irrigación por jeringa (0,645 mm2) fue estadísticamente mayor a la provocada por la irrigación por presión negativa (0 mm2) (U Mann Whitney, p <0,001). Se concluyó que la irrigación por presión negativa produce menos extrusión de la solución irrigante, no sólo en frecuencia sino también en área de extrusión comparado con la irrigación por jeringa.

Root canal irrigants should be able reach the entire root canal system, including the mostapical portions, in order to achieve better cleaning and disinfection. However, there exists arisk of irrigant extrusion to the perirradicular area. The present study had an experimentaldesign with the purpose of evaluating irrigant apical extrusion of the endodontic irrigantaccording to the irrigating technique during final irrigation y extracted human teeth, ex vivo.Forty six anterior upper single canaled teeth were used and the roots were embedded into aconducting transparent gel. An irrigating/aspirating needle was placed 2 mm from workinglength and irrigation was performed with a contrast solution at 4 ml/min during 60 s.Eighteen teeth were used for syringe irrigation and negative pressure irrigation each Additionally, 5 teeth were used for positive and negative controls, each. The presence andextrusion area were evaluated. The Chi2 test found a statistically significant asociation (p <0,001) between extrusion and irrigation technique. The median area of extrusion by syringeirrigation (0,645 mm2) was statistically greater than that by negative pressure irrigation (0mm2) (Mann Whitney U, p <0,001). In conclusion, the frequency and extent of extrusioncaused by negative pressure irrigation was less compared to syringe irrigation.