RÉSUMÉ
Introducción: los efectos adversos severos son la causa principal de las interrupciones en las sesiones de radioterapia, lo cual repercute negativamente en el beneficio terapéutico esperado de estas intervenciones. Por tanto, la participación del estomatólogo en el diseño y ejecución de los protocolos de tratamiento estomatológico en pacientes con cáncer es tan importante como lo es el esquema de la terapia oncoespecífica. El control de las condiciones bucales desfavorables previo al comienzo del tratamiento constituye un factor de protección y condiciona la continuidad y el éxito terapéutico. Objetivos: identificar los eventos adversos a consecuencia del tratamiento radioionizante y determinar la relación entre los eventos adversos y las condiciones bucales preexistentes en pacientes geriátricos con cáncer de cabeza y cuello. Métodos: se realizó un estudio descriptivo, prospectivo y longitudinal en 72 pacientes geriátricos con cáncer de cabeza y cuello tributarios de radioterapia. Se evaluó el estado de salud bucal previo al inicio del tratamiento y durante este, basado en la guía de criterios comunes de toxicidad. Las variables estudiadas fueron edad, género, sitio topográfico, etapa clínica, estado de salud bucal, severidad de los efectos adversos e interrupciones de la radioterapia. El procesamiento de los datos se realizó utilizando el programa SPSS 11.0 y Epidat. Resultados: el 67 por ciento de los pacientes estaba comprendido en el grupo etario de 60-69 años, el 70 por ciento eran hombres. El 67 por ciento de todos los pacientes examinados tenían una condición bucal desfavorable y de ellos el 56 por ciento tuvo que interrumpir el tratamiento radioterapéutico. A partir de la sesión de radioterapia número 20 correspondiente a 40 Gy, todos los pacientes presentaron al menos un efecto adverso. Los principales eventos adversos fueron disgeusia, xerostomía y radiomucositis. Se demostró una asociación significativa entre los efectos adversos por radioterapia y el estado desfavorable de las condiciones bucales previo al inicio del tratamiento. Conclusiones: los resultados indican que la evaluación bucal estomatológica antes, durante y después de la terapia oncoespecífica debe constituir una práctica habitual en la atención de pacientes con cáncer de cabeza y cuello, pues la interrupción del tratamiento radiante por el agravamiento de los efectos adversos conspira contra la efectividad de esta terapéutica(AU)
Introduction: severe adverse effects are the main cause for interrupting radiotherapy sessions, a fact that has a negative repercussion in the therapeutically benefit expected from theses interventions. Therefore, the dental surgeon's involvement in designing and practicing these dental management protocols in patients with cancer is so important as the oncospecific therapies scheme. The control of unfavorable oral conditions before treatment is a protection factor and conditions therapeutic continuation and success. Objectives: to identify adverse events as a result of radioionic treatment and determine the relationship between adverse events and pre-existing oral conditions in geriatric patients with head and neck cancer. Methods: adescriptive, prospective and longitudinal study was carried out in 72 geriatric patients with head and neck cancer and who were receiving radiotherapy. The oral health status was evaluated right before and during treatment, based on the guidelines of common toxicity criteria. The variables studied were age, gender, topographic site, clinical stage, oral health status, severity of adverse effects and interruptions of radiotherapy. Data processing was performed using the programs SPSS 11.0 and Epidat. Results: 67 percent of the patients were included in the age group of 60-69 years, 70 percent were men. 67 percent of all examined patients had an oral condition that was unfavorable and, out of these, 56 percent had to interrupt the radiotherapeutic treatment. From the radiotherapy session number 20 on, corresponding to 40 Gy, all the patients presented at least one adverse effect. The main adverse events were dysgeusia, xerostomia and radiomucositis. A significant association was proved between the adverse effects of radiotherapy and the unfavorable oral conditions prior to the start of treatment. Conclusions: the results indicate that oral assessment in dentistry before, during and after oncoespecific therapy should be a common practice in the care of patients with head and neck cancer, since the interruption of radiotherapy due to the worsening of adverse effects negatively influence the effectiveness of this therapy(AU)
Sujet(s)
Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Sujet âgé , Tumeurs de la tête et du cou/traitement médicamenteux , Santé buccodentaire/statistiques et données numériques , Manifestations buccales , Radiothérapie/effets indésirables , Épidémiologie Descriptive , Études longitudinales , Études prospectives , Résultat thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
The purposes of this study were to investigate the oral health care conditions of patients who have Leprous disease, which is an infectious disease(Dental caries: DMF rate and DMFT rate, and Periodontal conditions: CPITN0, CPITN1 CPITN2 CPITN3 ) and the satisfaction of use of denture fabrication related to general, functional and esthetic factors among dental patients for pre-Prothodontic Oro-maxillofacial minor surgury in National sorokdo hospital. The objects for this study were 754patients(male: 453, female: 301, 60-69ages: 340, 70-79ages: 414)treated in the oral health center among Leprous disease patients with gingivitis and periodontal disease, residents in the Sorokdo from 2003, January to 2005, September. 1. The results of Dental caries investigated that the number of 60-80year-old patients group that DMF rate was 99.2% of them, DMFT rate 59.2% 2. The results of periodontal conditios investigated that the number of 60-69year-old patients group were Community Periodontal treatment need index(CPITN)0: 15, CPITN1: 2, CPITN2: 66, CPITN3: 257, and 70-79year-old patients group were CPITN0: 27, CPITN1: 1, CPITN2: 116, CPITN3: 271 (Community Periodontal treatment need index(CPITN)0 of patients who have Leprous disease means anodontia states) 3. Dental fabrication patients for pre-Prothodontic Oro-maxillofacial minor surgury have operated Lower lip reconstruction, Hypergingivotomy, Flap, Alveoloplasty, Tours ostotomy and Apicoectomny
Sujet(s)
Femelle , Humains , Alvéoloplastie , Anodontie , Caries dentaires , Appareils de prothèse dentaire , Gingivite , Lèpre , Lèvre , Santé buccodentaire , Maladies parodontalesRÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of oral care either with normal saline or with tantum solution on the oral state of the patients in intensive care unit as well as the frequency of bacteria occurrence inside their oral cavities. METHOD: The study was performed from March thru May of 2003 on the nonequivalent control group non-synchronized quasi-experimental design. Forty subjects were selected for each group. The data were analyzed using the SPSS 10.0 Win. The pre-experimental homogeneity and post-experimental differences between the two groups were analyzed with t-test. RESULT: There was a significant difference in the oral cavity state between the experimental group that had used normal saline and the control group that had used tantum solution. CONCLUSION: Based on the results described above, it is considered that normal saline is more effective than the tantum solution for the oral care of the patients in intensive care unit.