Résumé
Objective To analyze the incidence and severity of drooling in children with cerebral palsy and explore its correlation with oral dyskinesia,dysphagia and gross motor function.Methods A hundred children with cerebral palsy treated in Qingdao Women's and Children's Hospital between July 2013 and 2016 and 50 healthy children examined in the health examination center were assessed using the drooling severity scale,oral motor assessment,a dysphagia disorders survey (DDS) and the gross motor function classification system (GMFCS).The relationship between drooling severity,oral dyskinesia,dysphagia and their gross motor function was analyzed.Results Of the 100 children with cerebral palsy,32％ displayed drooling (at levels Ⅱ through Ⅴ),which was significantly higher than among the healthy controls.Another sixty-eight displayed level Ⅰ drooling.The severity of drooling was significantly different among children with different cerebral palsies.The drooling of children with spastic quadriplegia,dyskinesia or mixed-type cerebral palsy was the most severe,followed by those with ataxia and spastic diplegia whose drooling was often mild.No hemiplegic child drooled at level Ⅱ.Drooling severity was negatively correlated with the oral motor score,but positively correlated with the average DDS and GMFCS scores.Conclusions About one third of cerebral palsy children suffer from drooling.Their drooling severity is closely associated with the type of the cerebral palsy,oral dyskinesia,dysphagia and GMFCS levels.
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical usefulness of the Schedule for Oral-Motor Assessment (SOMA) in children with dysphagia by comparing findings of SOMA with those of the videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS). METHOD: Both SOMA and VFSS were performed in 33 children with dysphagia (21 boys and 12 girls; mean age 17.3+/-12.1 months) who were referred for oropharyngeal evaluation. Ratings of oral-motor functions indicated by SOMA were based upon the cutting score of each specific texture of food (puree, semi-solids, solids, cracker, liquid-bottle, and liquid-cup). Abnormalities of either the oral phase, or the pharyngeal phase as indicated by VFSS were assessed by a physician and a speech-language pathologist. RESULTS: There was significant consistency between the findings of SOMA and the oral phase evaluation by VFSS (Kappa=0.419, p=0.023). SOMA reached 87.5% sensitivity, 66.6% specificity, and 95.4% positive predictive value when compared with the oral phase of the VFSS. We were able to evaluate oral-motor function by using SOMA in 6 children who were unable to complete the oral phase evaluation by VFSS, due to fear and crying during the study. The findings of SOMA failed to show any consistency with the pharyngeal phase evaluation by VFSS (Kappa=-0.105, p=0.509). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that SOMA is a reliable method for evaluation of oral-motor function in children with dysphagia. In particular, SOMA is recommended for children that were unable to complete the oral phase evaluation by VFSS due to poor cooperation.