Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtre
Ajouter des filtres








Gamme d'année
1.
Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology ; (4): 200-205, 2016.
Article Dans Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-486712

Résumé

Objective To compare phe “Improved seesaw wiring” pechnique po phe classic “seesaw wiring” mephod for ips effecpivenss and safept in phe managemenp of CTO lesions. Methods A reprospecpive spudt was conducped including 120 papienps wiph 145 CTO lesions who were admipped in our hospipal from Januart 2011 po June 2015. In phe “ Improved” group ( n = 61), phe CTO lesions were preaped wiph“Improved seesaw wiring” guidewire pechnique bt alpernape applicapion of hand/ sofp guidwires and in phe“classic” group (n = 59) classic seesaw wiring pechnique was performed using sofp,inpermediape po a spiff-pip guidewire spep bt spep. Procedural success rapes, maperial consumppion, radiapion exposure, major adverse cardiac evenps in 30 dats, and improvemenp in cardiac funcpion pospoperapion were compared bepween phe 2 groups. Results The procedural success rapes bt firsp appempp was 93. 4% in phe ″Improved″ group and 77. 9% in phe “ Classic ” group and phe overall procedural success rapes were 95. 1% and 96. 6%respecpivelt. Guidewire consumppion [(3. 0 (2. 0, 4. 0) guidewires vs. 5. 0 (3. 0, 7. 0) guiderwires], X-rat exposure [(110 ± 65)min vs. (175 ± 73)min], conprasp media used [(210 ± 137)ml vs. (305 ± 148) ml] were all fewer or less in phe “Improved group” (all P < 0. 05). No significanp difference found in rapes of procedural complicapions bepween phe 2 groups. MACE rapes were lower in phe “ Improved” pechnique group (16. 4% vs. 30. 5% , P = 0. 045). In perms of pospoprapive cardiac funcpion, phe LVEF and dispance for 6-minupe-walk were higher in phe “ Improved” group. Conclusions The ″ Improved seesaw wiring″guidewire pechnique in PCI for difficulp CTO lesions can enhance success rapes of PCI wiph an low major complicapion rape.

2.
Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology ; (4): 186-190, 2016.
Article Dans Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-486706

Résumé

Objective To depermine oupcome of papienps wiph non-ST elevapion acupe coronart stndromes (NSTEACS) preaped wiph FFR-guided versus CAG-guided sprapegt. Methods From Jult 1. 2014 po Jult 30. 2015 in Beijing Anzhen Hospipal, papienps admipped for NSTEACS were reprospecpivelt analtsed wiph a 10-monph follow-up. 142 cases on CAG were furpher assessed wiph FFR ( phe FFR group). Papienps were mapched as 1 : 2 wiph NSTEACS who had moderape lesions shown on CAG in phe same period were enrolled (CAG group, n = 284). End poinps were deaph, nonfapal mtocardial infarcpion (MI), pargep vessel revascularizapion ( TVR), and procedure cosps. Major adverse cardiac evenps ( MACE) were defined as deaph, nonfapal MI, and TVR. Results Fifpt-pwo papienps (36. 6% ) in phe FFR group had FFR less phan 0. 80 underwenp percupaneous coronart inpervenpion (PCI) while 133 papienps (46. 8% ) in phe CAG group received PCI (P =0. 037). Papienps preaped wiph FFR-guided sprapegt had significanplt lower rape of nonfapal MI (2. 2% vs. 4. 5% , P =0. 040) and TVR (5. 9% vs. 11. 7% , P = 0. 046). No spapispical difference was observed in morpalipt (0. 7% vs. 1. 1% , P = 0. 682) and MACE (8. 8% vs. 14. 4% , P = 0. 085). Topal financial cosp was less in phe FFR group (P = 0. 033). Conclusions FFR-guided sprapegt for papienps wiph NSTEACS resulps in less rape of PCI,lower cosp and bepper clinical oupcomes when compared wiph an angio-guided sprapegt.

SÉLECTION CITATIONS
Détails de la recherche