The Change of Portal Hemodynamics before and after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt according to Variceal Type: Gastric and Esophageal varix

PURPOSE: To investigate the changes occurring in portal hemodynamics in patients with esophageal and gastric varices, according to variceal type, before and after TIPS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1994 and June 1999, we evaluated 22 of 44 patients who had undergone TIPS and endoscopy on admission. In these 22, hepatic venous and main portal venous pressure were measured. On the basis of endoscpic findings, the esophageal and gastric varices were classified as one of three types. Changes in portal hemodynamics in relation to the diameter of the portal vein, mean portosystemic gradient before and after TIPS, delta MPSG, and the presence of hepatic encephalopathy and gastrorenal shunt were all evaluated. RESULTS: Endoscopy indicated that there were ten Type-I cases, nine Type-II, and three Type-III. The diameter of the main portal vein was 14.95 +/-1.79 mm in Type I cases, and 13.35 +/-1.59 mm in Type II. Before TIPS, main portal venous pressure was 31.40 +/-6.79 mmHg (Type I) and 22.80 +/-4.26 mmHg (Type II), and the mean portosystemic gradient was 16.10 +/-7.0 mmHg (Type I), and 11.20 +/-5.36 mmHg (Type II). After TIPS, the pressure readings were 25.70 +/-7.60 mmHg (Type I) and 17.80 +/-6.52 mmHg (Type II), while those relating to were 10.80 +/-4.94 mmHg (Type I) and 5.25 +/-3.67 mmHg (Type II). delta MPSG was 6.04 +/-2.98 mmHg (Type I) and 5.91 +/-3.98 mmHg (Type II). Angiography revealed that the gastrorenal shunt was Type I in 10% of cases, Type II in 77%, and Type III in 33%. Hepatic encephalopathy after TIPS occured in three Type-I cases, three-Type- II, and two Type-III. CONCLUSION: The diameter of the main portal vein was significantly smaller, and portal venous pressure and mean portosystemic gradient before and after TIPS significantly lower in patients with dominant gastric varices than in those with dominant esophageal varices (p<0.05). Gastrorenal shunt was more frequent among patients with dominant gastric varices. No difference in the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy after TIPS was noted between those with dominant gastric varices and those with the esophageal variety.

Postprandial Hepatic Volume Change: Spiral CT Evaluation in Case of Liver Cirrhosis

PURPOSE: To investigate the usefulness of evaluating liver cirrhosis through the measurement of liver volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a control group(20 normal subjects) and 20 cirrhotic patients, variations in liver volume before and after a meal were obtained. A case-control study was conducted between the two groups. RESULTS: In the control group, the range of increased liver volume after the meal was 67-186ml. Mean increased liver volume was 119.3ml, the range of percentage increase was 6-12% and the mean percentage increase was 9.89%. In cirrhotic patients, the range of increased liver volume after the meal was 1-20ml. Mean increased liver volume was 6.9ml, the range of percentage increase was 0-1.9% and the mean percentage increase was 0.65%. Compared with the control group, cirrhotic patients showed a much smaller increase in liver volume (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Difference in variation of liver volume between a control group and cirrhotic patients before and after a meal can be used for the evaluation of liver cirrhosis.

Embolization of Seve re Arterioportal Shunts in the Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Safety and Influence on Patient Survival

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and the influence of embolization of severe arterioportal shunts, and the effect of the procedure on the survival rate of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma combined with portal vein tumor thrombosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study involved a total of 54 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in whom hepatic arteriography revealed severe arterioportal shunt. From among this total, 34 patients (embolization group) underwent chemoinfusion after shunt embolization, while 19 (control group) underwent chemoinfusion only. The embolic materials included PVA particles and/or Gelfoam pieces. The frequency of postembolization symptoms (Chi-squared test) and changes in laboratory values (paired t-test) were compared between the two groups, and shunt improvement was also evaluated. Patient survival was tested using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Fever and RUQ pain were more frequent in the embolization group (p<0.001). The complications of embolization included severe postembolization syndrome (n=1), acute hepatic failure (n=2), hepatic infarction (n=1), and sepsis (n=1). There were no significant changes in laboratory values. Among the 28 patients (24 of embolization group and four of control group) who underwent follow-up angiography, arterioportal shunt became less severe or disappeared in ten of the embolization group. For the embolization and control groups, the mean survival interval was 29.5 +/-5.4 weeks and 10.3 +/-3.1 weeks (p=0.0002), respectively. The best results were seen in the PVA particle group (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: The embolization of severe arterioportal shunts is relatively safe and increases patient survival rate.