Comparitive Analysis of Outcome of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation II (PFNA-II) and Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) in the Management of Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur

Background: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with intertrochanteric fractures treated with PFNA-II versus DHS. Material & Methods:50 adult patients with inter-trochanteric fractures, >20 years old, were randomly distributed into the PFNA-II and DHS groups. DHS with side-plate and proximal femoral nail A-II of appropriate size was used. The patients were regularly followed up till 1 year post-operatively. The clinical, radiological and functional evaluations were done at regular intervals. The peri-operative, early and delayed complications were recorded, and the final outcome of either group was evaluated using the Harris Hip Score. Results:In the DHS group, the mean Harris Hip Score was slightly lower than that of the PFNA-II group at six month follow-up. However, at the 1 year follow-up, both the groups achieved similar Harris Hip Scores. Conclusion:PFNA-II provides a significantly shorter operative time with a smaller incision that leads to lesser blood loss and wound-related complications. However, the incidence of procedural errors was significantly higher in PFNA-II when compared with DHS as it is a technically more demanding procedure that leads to more implant failures and consequent re-operations.

Helical Blade versus Lag Screw for Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fracture

PURPOSE: To evaluate the radiographic and functional outcomes between who had unstable intertrochanteric fracture, treated with the ITST (lag screw design) and the PFNA (helical blade design). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We selected each 17 and 13 patients of unstable intertrochanteric fracture which were treated with ITST or PFNA from April 2005 to December 2008. We evaluated the radiographic results by follow-up radiography and the clinical outcomes with the mobility score of Parker and Palmer, Social function scoring system. RESULTS: The mean sliding distance of cervical screw with ITST nails was not shown significant differences than with using PFNA nails. The other factors were not statistically different. Decrease of mobility score of Parker and Palmer, Social function score were similar. 2 cases of cutting out was noted with ITST nails and 1 case of cutting out was noted with PFNA nails. CONCLUSION: Unlike the existed biomechanical reposts, there are no differences that are clinical and radiological results in treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fracture using the ITST nails and PFNA nails.