Résumé
Objective To assess the feasibility of secondary check by LinaTech TiGRT treatment planning systems.Methods Choosing the Linatech TiGRT treatment planning system,researched and developed by Linatech company,as the third-party check tools.First,using Linatech TPS for recomputing treatment plans for geometrical phantoms designed in TG-119 and patients.after computation,compared the point dose with the measured data of phantoms (Using chameber No.2571 to measure point dose) and original plans.Using PTW verisoft with a criteria of 3% dose difference and 5 mm distance to agreement to assess the dose distribution on center level.After then,you can assess the accuracy of treatment plans.Results Tiny volume changes were found in ROI,especially in small size phantoms orcuspidal regions.For comparing measured data with recomputed plans and original plans,the dose data were found basically identical in TG-119 phantoms.And for patients,the differences between recomputed plans and AAA original plans or AXB original plans were smaller in breast cancer,but they were even bigger innasopharynx cancer,all patient cases showed a gamma passing rate more than 90%.The gamma passing rate of AAA original plans and AXB original plans were 95.6% and 97.53% for breast cancer,and 94.67% and 96.83% for nasopharynx cancer.Conclusions The method of utilizing the LinaTech TiGRT treatment planning system as a third-party check tools to assess the accuracy of plans is feasible,and the validation process is convenient,but some functions still need to improve and the scope of differences still need more patient cases to determine.
Résumé
Objective To test the accuracy of a three-dimensional dose verification system CompassR,which reconstructing dose distribution based on measurements and independent dose calculation,and to evaluate the feasibility of its application in clinical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) quality assure.Methods A set of square-wave chart patterns of 2 cm,1 cm and 0.5 cm gaps was designed and 11 completed IMRT lung plans were selected for the test.EDR2 film and the ionization chamber were used for test and verifying of plane dose distribution and some special points dose of CompassR.The IMRT phantom plans were verified by CompassR with three-dimension based on anatomical information.Parameters including the volume γ pass rate and the average dose deviation were tested using dose volume histograms.Results In square-wave chart patterns test,the dose distribution reconstructed and calculated by CompassR coincided with the measurement using film.The γ pass rates (3％/3 mm,2％/2 mm) exceeded 90％.When the width of field is 0.5 cm,the γ pass rate was a little lower on account of the penumbra zone.Compared to the dose distribution profile which was measured by film,the maximum deviations of the dose distribution profile which was reconstructed and calculated by CompassR were 3.21％ and 2.70％.The absolute dose deviation of specific point in the IMRT plans was less than 3％,the maximum deviation occurred in the lung.Compared to film,the averageγpass rates on the isocenter plain in IMRT plan were (94.65 + 1.93)％ (3％/3 mm) which was reconstructed by CompassR.In three-dimensional dose verification,the volume γ pass rates of targets and risk organs were not less than 90％,and the deviation of average dose was less than 1％.Conclusions Accuracy of the tested system satisfies the demand of IMRT dose verification.CompassR could provide information of volumetric dosimetry and anatomical location of dose error,which is benefit for evaluating the clinical value of verification result.
Résumé
Objective To study the image quality control system to ensure that equipment meet clinical needs.Methods It was scanning the Catphan504 phantom with models of high quality head,standard dose head and pelvis,we could get the results of CT numbers linearity,uniformity,spatial resolution,contrast resolution.Using T test to compare different scanning technique results.Results The standard dose head scanning technique was better than the pelvis scanning technique in CT numbers linearity test,and gets the best result in uniformity test.The result of CT numbers uniformity was higher in the standard dose head scanning than the high quality head and the pelvis scanning (9.7 ±3.9 vs.17.9 ±5.3,P =0.00 and 9.5 ± 4.0 vs.31.1 ± 5.7,P =0.00).The result of contrast resolution was higher in the pelvis scanning than the high quality head and the pelvis scanning (5.6 ± 0.1 vs.1.3 ± 0.5,P =0.00 and 6.0 ± 1.0 vs.1.3 ± 0.5,P =0.00).The result of spatial linear distance was very accurate,the range was 4.98 -5.06 cm.Conclusions The results of spatial linearity test are stable and accuracy,but CT numbers linearity and uniformity test are affected by the scanning technique significantly for device.To spatial resolution test and contrast resolution test,we need to set the standard and tolerance according to each linear accelerator specialty.
Résumé
Objective Performing a daily quality assure (QA) program to get variation and error range of on board imager (OBI) system,so that the OBI system can meet the needs of clinical treatment.Methods The daily QA program including: mechanical accuracy,2D/2D Shift calculations accuracy,couch motion accuracy.Results The max deviation was-0.7 mm in lcft-right (LR) dircction and 0.8 mm in superior-inferior (S1) direction in Linac& OBI isocenter accuracy check.The max deviations in 4 blades (x1,x2,y2,y1) position accuracy check were:-2.1 mm,2.2 mm,± 1.7 mm,-2.1 mm.In OBI mechanical arms position accuracy check,31％ standard data was 85.2 cm with 0 mm deviation; 69％ standard data was 85.1 cm with 1 mm deviation.In LR,SI and anterior-posterior direction,2D/2D shift calculations accuracy was 0.46 mm,1.35 mm,-0.04 mm and couch motion accuracy was-0.1 mm,0.3 mm,0.2 mm,respectively.Conclusions By performing the daily QA program,it could be found whether OBI works properly and satisfies the clinical use.The physicist can pay more attention to the parameters which change frequently,and adjust the frequency of the parameters which are stable,so that working efficiently.
Résumé
Objective To develop an accurate 2D dose reconstruction model using electronic portal imaging device (EPID).2D dosimetric verifications of volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy (VIMAT)were done using the model.And the results were compared to other dosimeters.Methods The EPID-based dose reconstruction model was using convolve,deconvolve and correction function.The dose profiles which were obtained by the ion chamber were used to determine the model parameters.A total of 12 VIMAT plans for the treatment of anatomical sites of various complexities were chosen.The results obtained from EPID were compared to other dosimeters and treatment planning system (TPS).The ion chamber was used to measure the central point absolute doses.Other dosimeters were used to measure the plane dose distributions.All dosimeters measured the dose at 10 cm depth.The results were analyzed using γevaluation method.Results Regarding absolute central point doses,the ion chamber results were within 1.5％ of the EPID results.For the comparison to Seven29 and Matrixx,the average γ pass rates with 2％and 2 mm criteria were 98.9％ and 99.8％ respectively.For the dose distributions measured by EPID and calculated by TPS,the γ pass rates with 3％ and 3 mm criteria were 99.9％.Conclusions The presented results which were obtained from the comparison of measured and calculated doses show the reliability of our EPID-based dose reconstruction model.With the model,EPID can be a reliable and fast tool for IMRT plan dosimetric verification.The model expanded to the 3D dosimetric verification in the uniform phantom will be considered as the next work.
Résumé
ObjectiveTo study the CT values of certain phantoms scanned by various CT scanners with dissimilar parameters.Methods The CT values of tissue equivalent inserts was measured in the TM164 and CIRS-062 phantom scanned by TOSHIBA AQUILIONTM,SIEMENS SOMATOMTMSENSATIONTM 64 and SIEMENS SOMATOMTM SENSATIONTM OPEN with different voltages,currents and slice thicknesses and then the corresponding CT-to-density curves was compared. Results There are no significant differences of CT values with various currents and slice thicknesses and also for low atom number materials scanned by different scanners with various tube voltages.The CT values of high atom number materials have obvious differences scanned with tube voltage,the maximum is about 400 HU.There are also significant differences between CT-density curves of two phantoms in the range from soft tissues to dense bone,the maximum is up to 500 HU.ConclusionsCT-density curves were highly affected by materials of phantoms,scanners and tube voltages.It is necessary to measure the curve with a comfortable phantom and certain scanner to assure the accuracy for dose calculation for treatment planning system.