Algunas claves para escribir correctamente un artículo científico / Some key factors in medical writing

The purpose of scientific research is to disseminate their results in a publication. Scientists, clinicians, graduate and postgraduate students are judged and are primarily known for their publications. A scientific experiment whilst their results may be outstanding does not end until those results are published. Thus, the scientists not only have to "do" science but also "write" science. A poor wording could prevent or delay the publication of an excellent scientific work. The purpose of this article is to help scientists and students to prepare manuscripts that are likely to be accepted for publication and to be perfectly understood when issued. As the requirements journal vary widely among disciplines, and even within a single discipline, it is not possible to make recommendations that are universally acceptable. Therefore, this article will get its importance, insofar as it is taken as a guide for those professionals who wish to publish their studies in national and international journals.

El objetivo de la investigación científica es divulgar sus resultados en una publicación. Hombres y mujeres de ciencia, médicos clínicos, estudiantes graduados y de postgrado son juzgados principalmente y se los conoce por sus publicaciones. Un experimento científico, por espectaculares que sean sus resultados, no termina hasta que esos resultados se publican. Así pues, el científico no sólo tiene que "hacer" ciencia sino también "escribir" ciencia. Una mala redacción puede impedir o retrasar la publicación de un trabajo excelente. El propósito de este artículo es ayudar a científicos y estudiantes a preparar manuscritos que tengan posibilidades de ser aceptado para su publicación y de ser perfectamente entendidos cuando se publiquen. Como los requisitos exigidos por las revistas varían mucho según las disciplinas, e incluso dentro de una misma disciplina, no es posible hacer recomendaciones que sean universalmente aceptables. Por lo tanto, el presente artículo obtendrá su importancia, en la medida que sea tomado como una guía por aquellos profesionales que deseen publicar sus estudios en diferentes revistas nacionales e internacionales.

HYPERACUTE REJECTION OF RENAL ALLOGRAFTS: CLINICAL ANALYSIS OF 12 CASES / 第二军医大学学报

Out of 321 cases of renal transplantation, 12 had hyperacute rejection(3.6%) after operation.Among them transplanted kidneys in 4 caseswere immediately remo-ved during operation, donor kidneys in 7 cases were removed 3-20d postoperation, and rejection in 1 case was controlled after suitable treatment,however donor kidney became atrophied gradually without being removed.Immunosuppressive drugs were discontinued and dialysis v/as restored in tjnv: in all the 12 patients.None of them died of rejection.Clinical diagnosis of hyperacute rejection was confirmed pathologically.Mechanisms, inducing factors, diagnosis and differential diagnosis, and treatment of hyperacute rejection are discussed.