Implications of five-year outcomes of PERIGON trial for bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement / 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志

@#For patients with aortic valve disease who require replacement of their native valve, surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) has been the standard of care. Due to the hemorrhage and thromboembolic risks of long-term anticoagulation therapy for mechanical prosthesis, bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR) has a trend to be used in younger patients, which raising the concern for the durability of bioprosthetic valves. The newly published 5-year outcomes of PERIGON trial, with no structural valve deterioration, again demonstrated the favorable durability of the new generation bioprosthetic valves, further providing the evidence of using bioprosthetic AVR in younger patients. At the meantime, the rapid progress of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has brought a new treatment option. For younger patients with low risks, choosing SAVR or TAVI becomes a critical decision. This paper reviews the outcomes of PERIGON trial and its implications to the clinical practice and research of bioprosthetic AVR.

Reflections on the era of valvular intervention—The perspective of surgeons / 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志

@#In recent years, the number of interventions for valvular heart disease has been increasing day by day, and it has become a hot topic in the field of cardiovascular surgery. Given the aging global population and trends in the prevalence of valvular disease and the broadening of indications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), a breakthrough of 130 000 TAVR procedures is expected by 2026. In the new technology development period, the development potential and technical advantages of heart valve interventional therapy should be faced squarely. This paper focuses on key issues such as comparison of outcomes after TAVR versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), prosthetic valve endocarditis after TAVR, and broadening of indications for TAVR, as well as recommendations on how surgeons face the era of TAVR. We hope that this article will help and attract the attention of cardiac surgeons.

Implications of five-year outcomes of COMMENCE (SAVR) trial for aortic valve surgery in China / 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志

@#The advent of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has brought up a new treatment option for patients with severe aortic valve disease. However, with the continuous expansion of surgical indications, problems such as structural valve deterioration caused by biological prosthesis have become increasingly prominent. In the newly announced 5-year follow-up results of COMMENCE (SAVR) trial, the aortic bioprosthesis using the new RESILIA biotissue material demonstrated extraordinary clinical safety, efficacy and durability with zero structural valve deterioration and excellent hemodynamic evaluation results. As a result, patients with valvular heart disease have more diverse therapeutic options. However, the choice between surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and TAVR, biological prosthesis and mechanical prosthesis, etc, has become more and more prominent, which brings more difficulties to clinicians. This paper reviews the research background, 5-year follow-up results of COMMENCE trial and the implications for aortic valve surgery in China.

Reemplazo valvular aórtico por cateterismo. Estado actual / Aortic valvular replacement by catheterism. Current state

Resumen La estenosis aórtica grave es una enfermedad común cuya prevalencia crece con el envejecimiento de la población. El reemplazo valvular aórtico quirúrgico (SAVR) ha sido la única alternativa efectiva hasta la aparición del reemplazo valvular aórtico por cateterismo (TAVR o TAVI). Este procedimiento se usó inicialmente para pacientes inoperables en quienes dos ensayos clínicos aleatorios y varios registros mostraron su superioridad sobre el tratamiento médico conservador. Dos ensayos clínicos adicionales en pacientes que, a pesar de ser considerados operables, tenían alto riesgo quirúrgico, demostraron la no inferioridad de TAVR versus reemplazo quirúrgico. Investigaciones posteriores probaron también su efectividad en pacientes de riesgo intermedio y bajo. Algunas complicaciones, como las relacionadas al acceso vascular, el accidente cerebro vascular, la necesidad de marcapasos definitivo y la regurgitación periprotésica, han ido disminuyendo con la mejoría de la tecnología, la curva de aprendizaje y la estrategia mínimamente invasiva actual. Queda pendiente determinar la durabilidad para establecer cuál será el papel de TAVR en la práctica clínica.

Abstract Severe aortic stenosis is a common disease whose prevalence is steadily growing with population ageing. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) has been the only effective alternative until the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR or TAVI). This procedure was initially used for non-surgical candidate patients where two randomized clinical trials and several registries showed superiority over conservative medical treatment. Furthermore, two additional clinical trials including high surgical risk patients proved the non-inferiority of TAVR versus surgical replacement. Similar findings regarding effectiveness were observed in other clinical trials including intermediate and low risk patients. Technical and procedural improvements, including learning curve and the current minimally invasive strategy have decreased periprocedural and mid-term complications such as those related with vascular access, stroke, the need for permanent pacemaker implantation and paravalvular leak. All things considered, durability is a pending question to establish which would be the role of TAVR in current and future practice.