Is propofol safe when administered to cirrhotic patients during sedative endoscopy?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In patients with liver cirrhosis, drugs acting on the central nervous system can lead to hepatic encephalopathy and the effects may be prolonged. Recently, misuse of propofol has been reported and the associated risk of death have become an issue. Propofol is commonly used during sedative endoscopy; therefore, its safety in high-risk groups must be further investigated. We performed a pilot study of the safety and efficacy of propofol during endoscopy in Korean patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed under sedation with propofol along with careful monitoring in 20 patients with liver cirrhosis and 20 control subjects. The presence or development of hepatic encephalopathy was assessed using the number connection test and neurologic examination. RESULTS: Neither respiratory depression nor clinically significant hypotension were observed. Immediate postanesthetic recovery at 5 and 10 minutes after the procedure was delayed in the cirrhotic patients compared with the control group; however, at 30 minutes, the postanesthetic recovery was similar in both groups. Baseline psychomotor performance was more impaired in cirrhotic patients, but propofol was not associated with deteriorated psychomotor function even in cirrhotic patients with a minimal hepatic encephalopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Sedation with propofol was well tolerated in cirrhotic patients. No newly developed hepatic encephalopathy was observed.

The Effect of Fixed Dose of Flumazenil on Recovery after Sedative Endoscopy by Midazolam / 대한소화기내시경학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Midazolam is widely used as a form of conscious sedation during endoscopy because of its rapid onset and safety. However, its relatively long half-life and paradoxical reactions are still a concern for doctors and patients. Flumazenil is a competitive benzodiazepine antagonist that acts to reverse the sedative and hypnotic effects of midazolam but its role and adequate dose have not been fully documented. This study evaluated the effect of a fixed dose of flumazenil on the recovery from sedative endoscopy by midazolam. METHODS: First study: 100 patients who received 0.05 mg/kg midazolam for conscious sedation were randomized into two groups: intravenous 0.25 mg flumazenil and a placebo. All patients were assessed using OAA/S (Observers Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale) scale (responsiveness, speech, facial expression and ptosis of eyelid) before the endoscopy, immediately after the procedure and every 5 minutes thereafter. The recovery time was defined as the time at which the OAA/S scale reached the pre-endoscopy level. Second study: In 40 patients, the OAA/S scale was assessed only after full recovery without any exogenous stimuli. The total dose of midazolam and the procedure time were assessed. RESULTS: The flumazenil group demonstrated a significantly shorter recovery time than the placebo group (p<0.0001). These results were not affected by age, gender, total midazolam dose and procedure time. There was a larger difference in the recovery time between the two groups in the second study than in the first. CONCLUSIONS: A fixed low dose flumazenil significantly reduced the recovery time after sedative endoscopy by midazolam. Flumazenil will be helpful for the early return to daily activities and for preventing post sedative complication.

The Effect of Fixed Dose of Flumazenil on Recovery after Sedative Endoscopy by Midazolam / 대한소화기내시경학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Midazolam is widely used as a form of conscious sedation during endoscopy because of its rapid onset and safety. However, its relatively long half-life and paradoxical reactions are still a concern for doctors and patients. Flumazenil is a competitive benzodiazepine antagonist that acts to reverse the sedative and hypnotic effects of midazolam but its role and adequate dose have not been fully documented. This study evaluated the effect of a fixed dose of flumazenil on the recovery from sedative endoscopy by midazolam. METHODS: First study: 100 patients who received 0.05 mg/kg midazolam for conscious sedation were randomized into two groups: intravenous 0.25 mg flumazenil and a placebo. All patients were assessed using OAA/S (Observers Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale) scale (responsiveness, speech, facial expression and ptosis of eyelid) before the endoscopy, immediately after the procedure and every 5 minutes thereafter. The recovery time was defined as the time at which the OAA/S scale reached the pre-endoscopy level. Second study: In 40 patients, the OAA/S scale was assessed only after full recovery without any exogenous stimuli. The total dose of midazolam and the procedure time were assessed. RESULTS: The flumazenil group demonstrated a significantly shorter recovery time than the placebo group (p<0.0001). These results were not affected by age, gender, total midazolam dose and procedure time. There was a larger difference in the recovery time between the two groups in the second study than in the first. CONCLUSIONS: A fixed low dose flumazenil significantly reduced the recovery time after sedative endoscopy by midazolam. Flumazenil will be helpful for the early return to daily activities and for preventing post sedative complication.