Comparison of Outcomes Between All-Inside SingleBundle and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study

@#Introduction: ACL rupture is the most common type of knee injury. The All-inside ACL reconstruction procedure features some distinguished components including closed-socket tunnels with less bone expulsion, double suspensory fixation, and smaller incisions. We aimed to compare the outcomes between the All-inside Single-bundle and the Double-bundle ACL reconstruction techniques. Materials and methods: This study was a retrospective study which analysed the patient-reported and the clinical outcomes on patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between January and December 2020 at Dr Kariadi General Hospital Semarang, Indonesia. We compared the patientreported and the clinical outcomes at 6- and 12-month follow-ups between the All-inside Single-bundle and the Double-bundle groups. The patient-reported outcomes were determined using the IKDC and Tegner-Lysholm scores while the clinical outcomes included the measurement of Thigh Circumference, Single Hop test, Anterior Drawer test, Lachman test, Range of motion, and the patient’s level of return to sport. Results: A total of 24 subjects were divided into two groups, namely the All-inside Single-bundle and the Double-bundle groups, consisting of 12 subjects in each group. Most of the subjects were male in both groups, including 9 (75%) subjects in the All-inside Single-bundle group, and 11 (91.67%) subjects in the Double-bundle group. The mean age of the subjects were 25.75±7.57 years old in the Allinside Single-bundle group, and 24.5±6.87 years old in the Double-bundle group. In terms of the side of the knee that suffered the most injuries in both groups were the right knees. The result of the patient-reported outcomes using IKDC and Tegner-Lysholm scores showed no statistically significant differences in both groups at 6- and 12-month follow-ups (p=0.864; p=0.293 and p=0.589; p=0.233, respectively). The results of clinical assessments at 6- and 12-month follow-ups also showed no statistically significant differences in both groups. Conclusion: Our study showed no significant differences in the patient-reported and the clinical outcomes between the All-inside Single-bundle and the Double-bundle ACL reconstruction techniques at 6- and 12-month follow-ups.

Intraoperative Graft Isometry in Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE: Little is known about the isometry of anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tunnel positions in vivo although it is closely related to graft tension throughout the range of motion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate intraoperative graft isometry in anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Graft length changes were assessed before bio-screw fixation in the tibial tunnel by pulling the graft with tensions of 20 lbs and 30 lbs in full extension at flexion angles of 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°. RESULTS: At the flexion angle of 30°, 20 lbs and 30 lbs of tension showed −0.4 mm and −0.6 mm length changes, respectively. The greater the flexion angle of the knee, the shorter the graft length in the joint. At the flexion angles of 90° and 120°, there was significant difference in the graft length change between 20 lbs and 30 lbs of tension. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction was non-isometric. The graft length was the longest in full extension. The tension of graft became loose in flexion. At the flexion angles of 90° and 120°, there was significant difference in the graft length change between 20 lbs and 30 lbs of tension.

Anatomical Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Medial Portal Technique.

Background: The traditional transtibial approach can limit anatomical placement of the femoral tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, Placement of an ACL graft within the anatomical femoral and tibial attachment sites is critical to the successful clinical outcome of ACL reconstruction. Surgical Technique: The medial portal technique was used for anatomic single bundle (SB) ACL reconstruction. Methods: Between November 2013 and October 2015, 30 ACL reconstructions were performed using the medial portal technique. All the patients were followed for a minimum of 06 months post-operatively. Clinical evaluation was done using the Lysholm score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) grade. Results: The mean Lysholm and the IKDC grade showed improvement at last follow up. None of the patients had a positive pivot shift test, anterior drawer test and Lachman test at final follow-up. Conclusion: The medial portal technique for anatomical SB ACL reconstruction is a simple technique showing good clinical results.

Radiographic Study of the Modified Femoral Tunnels of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction / 中国运动医学杂志

Objective To modify anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)reconstruction to achieve better structure;to measure the tunnel's position and shape using three-dimensional computed tomography (CT)so as to show the change of the femoral bony tunnel.Methods Forty-five patients were diagnosed with an ACL tear and subsequently underwent the modified ACL reconstruction,using a minor-diameter drill to drill the femoral tunnel and then expand it to oval-shaped tunnel with the raspatory between July 2014 and 2015.All procedures were conducted by the same experienced surgeon (Ao Yf.).In all patients,CT was performed at one week after the ACL reconstruction to evaluate the femoral tunnel's positioning,then the CT-images were imported into the image processing software MIMICS to reconstruct the femoral bony tunnel to measure the tunnel's diameters of the section and the shape.The tunnel's position was evaluated using the quadrant method.Results In all the 45 patients,the graft could pass the tunnel.And no posterior tunnel wall blowout,neurological or vascular deficit was documented during the operation.According to the different methods of modification (6 to 7,6 to 8 and 7 to 8),the long diameters of the sections of the femoral bony tunnels were 8.34-± 0.52 mm,10.65 ± 0.72mm,9.27-± 0.11 mm,without significant difference from the theoretical value (8.16 mm,10.66 mm and 9.14 mm).However,the short diameters of the sections were 6.57--0.12 mm,6.74-± 0.13 mm,and 7.52 ± 0.05 mm,showing significant difference from the theoretical value (6mm,6mm and 7 mm).The average centre of the femoral tunnel was located at 26.4 ± 4.8％ of the femoral length and at 30.1 ± 5.6％ of the femoral height.Conclusion In this modified ACL reconstruction,a minor-diameter drill is used to drill the femoral tunnel and then expand it to oval-shaped tunnel with the raspatory,The graft was matched well with the bony tunnel intraoperatively.The three-dimensional CT shows that the femoral tunnels are well located within the anatomical ACL footprint,and its entrance is closer to the natural state.

Effect of single bundle anatomic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with the hamstring autograft through anteromedial approach / 中国内镜杂志

Objective To investigate the effect of single bundle anatomic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) with the hamstring autograft through anteromedial approach. Methods From January 2012 to Jan-uary 2014, 39 patients with ACL tore had been treated with single bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction with the hamstring autograft. In this group, 20 males and 19 females, 16 cases of the left knee and 23 cases of the right knee;including 27 cases of sports injuries, 5 cases of traffic accident injury and 7 cases of fall injury.8 cases were acute injury the others were old injury. 22 cases were had the meniscus injury. All patients were treated with single bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction with the hamstring autograft. The femoral tunnel was establish through the anteromedial approach. The medial meniscus suture was performed in 10 cases, partial resection in 2 cases, lateral meniscus su-ture in 9 cases, partial resection in 1 cases. The hamstring autograft was fixed with the RIGFIX system in the femoral tunnel and the BIOSURE SYNC in the tibia tunnel. The Lysholm score was used to evaluate the recovery of knee function, and the MRI score was used to evaluate the integraty of the grafts. Results All cases were followedup for 15 to 39 months with an average of 21.5 months. All cases had no vascular nerve injury, joint stiffness, infec-tion and other complications. All cases had good stability after 1 year and recover to normal sports after six months and intense sports after half past a year postoperation. The anterior drawer test and the Pivot shift tests were negative in all patients. The Lacheman test wasⅠin 1 patient and others were negative. The mean Lysholm score was (93.85± 4.33) which significantly increased compared with preoperative scores which was (36.84 ± 5.60) after 15 months (P <0.05). The MRI showed good maturity and normal morphology of the ACL autograft, the MRI score was (9.80 ±1.70) after 1 year postoperation. Conclusion The arthroscopic single bundle individual anatomic ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft through anteromedial approach is effective, simple to perform and gives a graft the same as nor-mal anatomy. The grafts revascularization is good and effectively restore the stability of the knee.

Anatomical Single-bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Freehand Transtibial Technique

PURPOSE: In anatomical single-bundle (SB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, the traditional transtibial approach can limit anatomical placement of the femoral tunnel. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: We present a novel three-point freehand technique that allows for anatomic SB ACL reconstruction with the transtibial technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2012 and December 2012, 55 ACL reconstructions were performed using the three-point freehand technique. All the patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months post-operatively. Clinical evaluation was done using the Lysholm score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) grade. All patients were analyzed by 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) at 1 week after surgery. RESULTS: The mean Lysholm score improved from 68.2+/-12.7 points preoperatively to 89.2+/-8.2 points at final follow-up. At final follow-up, the IKDC grade was normal in 42 patients and nearly normal in 13 patients. None of the patients had a positive pivot shift test, anterior drawer test and Lachman test at final follow-up. The anatomical position of the femoral tunnel was confirmed on 3D CT scans. CONCLUSIONS: The three-point freehand technique for SB transtibial ACL reconstruction is a simple, anatomic technique showing good clinical results.

Kinematic Analysis of Five Different Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques

Several anatomical anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction techniques have been proposed to restore normal joint kinematics. However, the relative superiorities of these techniques with one another and traditional single-bundle reconstructions are unclear. Kinematic responses of five previously reported reconstruction techniques (single-bundle reconstruction using a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft [SBR-BPTB], single-bundle reconstruction using a hamstring tendon graft [SBR-HST], single-tunnel double-bundle reconstruction using a hamstring tendon graft [STDBR-HST], anatomical single-tunnel reconstruction using a hamstring tendon graft [ASTR-HST], and a double-tunnel double-bundle reconstruction using a hamstring tendon graft [DBR-HST]) were systematically analyzed. The knee kinematics were determined under anterior tibial load (134 N) and simulated quadriceps load (400 N) at 0degrees, 15degrees, 30degrees, 60degrees, and 90degrees of flexion using a robotic testing system. Anterior joint stability under anterior tibial load was qualified as normal for ASTR-HST and DBR-HST and nearly normal for SBR-BPTB, SBR-HST, and STDBR-HST as per the International Knee Documentation Committee knee examination form categorization. The analysis of this study also demonstrated that SBR-BPTB, STDBR-HST, ASTR-HST, and DBR-HST restored the anterior joint stability to normal condition while the SBR-HST resulted in a nearly normal anterior joint stability under the action of simulated quadriceps load. The medial-lateral translations were restored to normal level by all the reconstructions. The internal tibial rotations under the simulated muscle load were over-constrained by all the reconstruction techniques, and more so by the DBR-HST. All five ACL reconstruction techniques could provide either normal or nearly normal anterior joint stability; however, the techniques over-constrained internal tibial rotation under the simulated quadriceps load.

Reconstrucción de ligamento cruzado anterior. Comparación de técnica transtibial versus técnica simple banda anatómica versus doble banda. Evaluación clínica y por resonancia magnética / Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Comparison between transtibial vs. anatomic single bundle vs. double bundle technique. Clinical and MRI evaluation

Introducción: El objetivo de nuestro estudio fue realizar una comparación retrospectiva clínica y con RMI, entre tres técnicas quirúrgicas de reconstrucción de LCA y compararlas con el LCA nativo. Nuestra hipótesis fue que desde portal medial se consigue mayor semejanza anatómica y que este resultado mejora la estabilidad articular objetiva y subjetiva. Material y métodos: comparación retrospectiva de 3 grupos de pacientes varones (20 pacientes por grupo), operados entre diciembre 2006 y diciembre 2007 por el mismo cirujano; seguimiento promedio de 5 años y 7 meses (rango 5 a 6 años). Grupo TT: reconstrucción con técnica monotúnel transtibial. Grupo SBA: reconstrucción con técnica anatómica simple banda. Grupo DBA: reconstrucción con técnica doble banda-doble túnel anatómica. Todos evaluados con score de Lysholm, IKDC, test de Lachman medido con artrómetro, test de pivot shift y RMI. Resultados: la reconstrucción de LCA con técnica SBA y DBA es muy precisa para alcanzar los puntos anatómicos de inserción y la inclinación del LCA comparándola con la técnica TT. No hubo diferencias significativas entre los 3 grupos a los 5 años de seguimiento en el score de Lysholm, en el IKDC; tampoco las hubo en el rango de movilidad, Lachman y pivot shift, siendo estos últimos menos marcados en el grupo de DBA y de SBA. Conclusión: las reconstrucciones con SBA y DBA son más anatómicas demostradas por RMI posoperatoria, sin embargo dicha ventaja teórica, no tiene expresión clínica significativa. Nivel de evidencia: III. Tipo de estudio: comparativo retrospectivo.

Purpose: To do a retrospective clinical and with MRI comparison between three surgical techniques of ACL reconstruction compared with the native ACL. We hypothesized that more anatomical similarity is achieved from medial portal and that this result improves objective and subjective joint stability. Methods: retrospective comparison of 3 groups of male patients that received surgery from December 2006 to December 2007, all performed by the same surgeon; average follow up 5 years and 7 months (range 5 to 6 years). TT group: 20 patients with conventional (transtibial) single bundle reconstruction; ASB group: 20 patients with anatomic single-bundle reconstruction; ADB group: 20 patients with anatomic double-bundle reconstruction. The outcomes were evaluated by an independent blinded observer using the Lysholm score, IKDC, Lachman test performed with KT1000 arthrometer, pivot-shift test and MRI to determine ACL graft obliquity and femoral and tibial insertion. Results: ASB and ADB reconstruction demonstrated a more anatomical graft placement and angulation in comparison with TT technique. There were no significant differences between the 3 groups at 5 years after surgery in the Lysholm score, IKDC; neither in Range Of Motion, Lachman test and pivot-shift test. Nevertheless, patients of ASB and ADB had better outcomes in the pivot shift and Lachman test. Conclusions: the postoperative MRI showed that ASB and ADB reconstructions are more anatomical; however, this theoretical advantage is not clinically relevant. Level of Evidence: III. Type of study: retrospective comparative.

Volume and Contact Surface Area Analysis of Bony Tunnels in Single and Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Autograft Tendons: In Vivo Three-Dimensional Imaging Analysis

BACKGROUND: Regarding reconstruction surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), there is still a debate whether to perform a single bundle (SB) or double bundle (DB) reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare the volume and surface area of femoral and tibial tunnels during transtibial SB versus transportal DB ACL reconstruction. METHODS: A consecutive series of 26 patients who underwent trantibial SB ACL reconstruction and 27 patients with transportal DB ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft from January 2010 to October 2010 were included in this study. Three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) was taken within one week after operation. The CT bone images were segmented with use of Mimics software v14.0. The obtained digital images were then imported in the commercial package Geomagic Studio v10.0 and SketchUp Pro v8.0 for processing. The femoral and tibial tunnel lengths, diameters, volumes and surface areas were evaluated. A comparison between the two groups was performed using the independent-samples t-test. A p-value less than the significance value of 5% (p < 0.05) was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Regarding femur tunnels, a significant difference was not found between the tunnel volume for SB technique (1,496.51 +/- 396.72 mm3) and the total tunnel volume for DB technique (1,593.81 +/- 469.42 mm3; p = 0.366). However, the total surface area for femoral tunnels was larger in DB technique (919.65 +/- 201.79 mm2) compared to SB technique (810.02 +/- 117.98 mm2; p = 0.004). For tibia tunnels, there was a significant difference between tunnel volume for the SB technique (2,070.43 +/- 565.07 mm3) and the total tunnel volume for the DB technique (2,681.93 +/- 668.09 mm3; p < or = 0.001). The tibial tunnel surface area for the SB technique (958.84 +/- 147.50 mm2) was smaller than the total tunnel surface area for the DB technique (1,493.31 +/- 220.79 mm2; p < or = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the total femoral tunnel volume was similar between two techniques, the total surface area was larger in the DB technique. For the tibia, both total tunnel volume and the surface area were larger in DB technique.

In Vivo Three-Dimensional Imaging Analysis of Femoral and Tibial Tunnel Locations in Single and Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions

BACKGROUND: Anatomic footprint restoration of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is recommended during reconstruction surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze the femoral and tibial tunnel positions of transtibial single bundle (SB) and transportal double bundle (DB) ACL reconstruction using three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT). METHODS: In this study, 26 patients who underwent transtibial SB ACL reconstruction and 27 patients with transportal DB ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft. 3D-CTs were taken within 1 week after the operation. The obtained digital images were then imported into the commercial package Geomagic Studio v10.0. The femoral tunnel positions were evaluated using the quadrant method. The mean, standard deviation, standard error, minimum, maximum, and 95% confidence interval values were determined for each measurement. RESULTS: The femoral tunnel for the SB technique was located 35.07% +/- 5.33% in depth and 16.62% +/- 4.99% in height. The anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) tunnel of DB technique was located 30.48% +/- 5.02% in depth, 17.12% +/- 5.84% in height and 34.76% +/- 5.87% in depth, 45.55% +/- 6.88% in height, respectively. The tibial tunnel with the SB technique was located 45.43% +/- 4.81% from the anterior margin and 47.62% +/- 2.51% from the medial tibial articular margin. The AM and PL tunnel of the DB technique was located 33.76% +/- 7.83% from the anterior margin, 45.56% +/- 2.71% from the medial tibial articular margin and 53.19% +/- 3.74% from the anterior margin, 46.00% +/- 2.48% from the medial tibial articular margin, respectively. The tibial tunnel position with the transtibial SB technique was located between the AM and PL tunnel positions formed with the transportal DB technique. CONCLUSIONS: Using the 3D-CT measuring method, the location of the tibia tunnel was between the AM and PL footprints, but the center of the femoral tunnel was at more shallow position from the AM bundle footprint when ACL reconstruction was performed by the transtibial SB technique.

Anatomical versus Non-Anatomical Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study of Comparison of Knee Stability

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the initial stability of anatomical and non-anatomical single bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and to determine which would better restore intact knee kinematics. Our hypothesis was that the initial stability of anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction would be superior to that of non-anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction. METHODS: Anterior tibial translation (ATT) and internal rotation of the tibia were measured with a computer navigation system in seven pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric knees under two testing conditions (manual maximum anterior force, and a manual maximum anterior force combined with an internal rotational force). Tests were performed at 0, 30, 60, and 90 degrees of flexion with the ACL intact, the ACL transected, and after reconstruction of one side of a pair with either anatomical or non-anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction. RESULTS: Under manual maximal anterior force, both reconstruction techniques showed no significant difference of ATT when compared to ACL intact knee state at 30degrees of knee flexion (p > 0.05). Under the combined anterior and internal rotatory force, non-anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction showed significant difference of ATT compared to those in ACL intact group (p 0.05). Internal rotation of the tibia showed no significant difference in the ACL intact, the ACL transected, non-anatomical reconstructed and anatomical reconstructed knees. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction restored the initial stability closer to the native ACL under combined anterior and internal rotational forces when compared to non-anatomical ACL single bundle reconstruction.

Comparison of Tunnel Enlargement between Single and Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the tunnel enlargement in patients who had undergone a double-bundle (DB) or single-bundle (SB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, and to determine the correlation between the extent of bone tunnel enlargement and the clinical results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 224 primary ACL reconstructions performed from January 2004 to May 2008 we examined in this study 38 patients who underwent a SB-ACL reconstruction and 30 patients underwent a DB-ACL reconstruction. They were followed up over 1 year. The evaluation methods were the Lachman test, pivot-shift test and KT-1000 measurement for knee stability and the Lysholm score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) ratings for the functional results. Tunnel enlargement was measured at the sclerotic ridge of the most widest area on the anteroposterior and lateral radiographs in longitudinal and vertical axis of the tunnel. RESULTS: The tunnel enlargement on the femoral side was similar in the DB-ACL group and the SB-ACL group. On the other hand, on the tibial side, the tunnel enlargement was less in the DB-ACL group than in the SB-ACL group (p=0.001, ICC: 0.94). The two groups showed different functional results and extent of stability recovery. The KT-1000 arthrometer revealed 1.1 mm and 93% of negative in the pivot-shift test for the DB-ACL group, which induced an improved tendency compared to the SB-ACL group. No correlation was found between the tunnel enlargement and clinical results. CONCLUSION: A DB-ACL reconstruction results in less tunnel enlargement on the tibial side than a SB-ACL reconstruction. There was no correlation between the tunnel enlargement and clinical results.

A Comparison of Arthroscopically Assisted Single and Double Bundle Tibial Inlay Reconstruction for Isolated Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the clinical results of arthroscopically assisted single and double bundle tibial inlay reconstructions of an isolated posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury. METHODS: This study reviewed the data for 14 patients who underwent a single bundle tibial inlay PCL reconstruction (Group A) and 16 patients who underwent a double bundle tibial inlay PCL reconstruction (Group B) between August 1999 and August 2002. The mean follow-up period in groups A and B was 90.5 months and 64 months, respectively. RESULTS: The Lysholm knee scores in groups A and B increased from an average of 43.3 +/- 7.04 and 44.7 +/- 5.02 preoperatively to 88.1 +/- 7.32 and 88.7 +/- 9.11 points at the final follow-up, respectively. In group A, stress radiography using a Telos device showed that the preoperative mean side-to-side differences (SSDs) of 9.5 +/- 1.60 mm at 30degrees of flexion and 9.8 +/- 1.70 mm at 90degrees of flexion were improved to 2.8 +/- 1.19 mm and 3.0 +/- 1.1 mm, respectively. In group B, the preoperative SSDs of 10.4 +/- 1.50 mm at 30degrees of flexion and 10.7 +/- 1.60 mm at 90degrees of flexion improved to 2.7 +/- 1.15 mm and 2.6 +/- 0.49 mm, respectively. There was no significant difference in the clinical scores and radiologic findings between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Single bundle and double bundle PCL reconstructions using the tibial inlay technique give satisfactory clinical results in patients with an isolated PCL injury, and there are no significant differences in the clinical and radiological results between the two techniques. These results suggest that it is unnecessary to perform the more technically challenging double bundle reconstruction using the tibial inlay technique in an isolated PCL injury.

Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is generally accepted as the most reliable method of re-establishing knee kinematics so as to prevent various symptoms related to the instability and subsequent injuries to the knee. Double bundle ACL reconstruction has emerged as a potential solution for single bundle reconstruction, as the latter can restore anteroposterior stability, but it had limitations for improving the rotational stability. However, double bundle reconstruction is a more complex surgical procedure and it remain unclear whether double bundle reconstruction has better results than single bundle reconstruction on long term follow-up. Recent studies have demonstrated that a femoral tunnel could be created independently of the tibial tunnel and in a more anatomic position by using the anteromedial portal technique, so that that there is better restoration of the rotational stability as well as anterior stability than that with performing the transtibial technique.

Rotary Instability after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Single BTB Tendon / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: To analyze both the functional restoration and recovery of rotational and anterior-posterior stability after a single bundle ACL reconstruction using a BTB tendon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 52 patients were evaluated with an average follow up period of 32 months. A Lachman test, KT-2000 arthrometer, and Pivot shift test were performed to analyze the AP and rotational stability of the patients. The IKDC and Lysholm score was then used to evaluate the clinical results of the patients. The correlation between femoral tunnel angle and recovery of rotational stability was evaluated to determine the association between the two variables. This study also evaluated how the recovery of rotational stability affects the functional recovery of the patients. RESULTS: At the final follow up, the results indicated significant improvement according to the negative Lachman tests in 40 cases (76%), with an average of 2.92 mm anterior translation in the KT-2000 arthrometer and negative Pivot shift tests in 41 cases (79%)(p<0.05). The Lysholm and IKDC scores also showed significant improvement (p<0.05). Throughout the study, Group A was designated as those with <5 mm anterior translation and a negative Pivot shift test whereas Group B had positive test results. In Group A, the results showed 35 normal (85%), and 6 near normal (15%) cases in the IKDC score system, whereas Group B showed 2 normal (25%) and 5 near normal (62.5%) cases. Group A had an average of 89.3 in the Lysholm score system whereas Group B had a score of 60.5. On the knee tunnel view, Group A showed an average femoral tunnel angle of 49.2degrees, whereas Group B showed 63.5degrees. CONCLUSION: Decreasing the inclination of the BTB tendon using a transtibial femoral tunnel angle at either 10'30 or 1'30 will result in an excellent clinical outcome by achieving both anterior and rotational stability when operating a single bundle ACL reconstruction.

Arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament with preservation of the remnants / 中国矫形外科杂志

[Objective]To evaluate the technique and outcome of arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) with preservation of the remnents.[Method]From June 2005 to May 2006, 28 knees with ACL tear in 28 patients were verified with arthroscopy in this department.Of them,8 knee were combined with lateral meniscus tear and 6 combined with medial meniscus tear. All the damaged ACLs were reconstructed with single bundle of autogenous quadrupled hamstring tendons under arthroscopy without remove of the remnants of ACL. Bioabsorbable interference screw was used for direct anatomic fixation of the reconstructed ligament.[Result]No severe complication occurred in early stage after operation in the 28 patients.All of them were followed up for 12 to 24 months with an average of 18 months. Lysholm score was remarkablely improved from 46～80 (mean 60.75?9.54) preoperatively to 85～100 (mean 95.89?6.24) at the latest follow up (P