Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrer
Plus de filtres








Gamme d'année
1.
Chinese Journal of Radiology ; (12): 421-425, 2018.
Article de Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-707951

RÉSUMÉ

Objective To explore the value of small surface coil combined with three-dimensional double-echo steady-state with water excitation (3D-DESS-WE) sequence in displaying mandibular nerves and their branches. Methods The maxillofacial regions of 52 volunteers were scanned unilaterally by a small surface coil combined with 3D-DESS-WE sequence. According to the Gray's anatomy atlas,MPR and CPR was done according to the anatomic position of mandibular nerve and the branches,the signal characteristics of the nerves and neighboring structures were analyzed. The displaying rate of the mandibular nerves and their branches were evaluated.The image quality and display of the nerve were subjectively scored. The signal intensity(SI) of the nerve and adjacent lateral pterygoid muscle were measured. The signal intensity ratio(SIR) of mandibular nerve/lateral pterygoid muscle (SIRN/M) was calculated. Results Compared with the muscles, the nerve showed iso-signal intensity. The subjective scores for all small coil 3D-DESS-WE images were 3.02 ± 0.82. The displaying rates of V3 trunk,anterior trunk,buccal nerve, posterior trunk,inferior alveolar nerve and lingual nerve were all 100%. V3 posterior trunk,inferior alveolar nerve and lingual nerve showed the best quality scores,which were all about 3 points,and the SIRN/M were about 1. The auricular temporal nerve and masseter muscle nerve were also basically satisfied. The displaying rate of mylohyoid muscle nerve,medial pterygoid nerve and lateral pterygoid nerve was low. Conclusion Small surface coil combine with 3D-DESS-WE sequence performed high-quality in mandibular nerves and their branches MR imaging using MPR,CPR post-processing technology,which are suitable for clinical application.

2.
Chinese Journal of Radiology ; (12): 641-645, 2015.
Article de Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-478858

RÉSUMÉ

Objective To explore the value of small surface coil combine with three-dimensional fast imaging with steady state precession and fat-suppression (3D-FISP-FS) sequence in displaying intra-parotid facial nerves segment and parotid ducts.Methods The parotid regions of 18 healthy volunteers who were excluded any parotid diseases were scanned by head&neck coil (36 sides) and 4 cm small surface coil (32 sides) combined with 3D-FISP-FS sequence prospectively. The obtained original images were treated through MIP, MPR and CPR, The MRI signal characteristics of parotid region structure, the subjective score of image quality, the signal intensity ratio (SIR) of facial nerve/parotid tissue (SIR N) and parotid duct/parotid tissue (SIRD) was calculated, and the displaying rates of the facial nerves and parotid ducts were observed. Wilcoxon matched-samples signed rank sum test was used to compare the scores of head&neck coil and small coil 3D-FISP-FS sequence images, paired t test was used to compare SIRN, SIRD of the two groups, Chi-square test was used to compare of the displaying rate of the facial nerves and parotid ducts in two groups. Results Eighteen volunteers were successfully performed MRI scan of parotid gland. On 3D-FISP-FS sequence images, the parotid gland was showed slightly low signal intensity, muscle tissue was showed medium signal intensity, the vessels were showed slightly high or high signal, parotid segment of facial nerve was showed tortuous line-like high signal intensity, and parotid duct was showed curve high signal intensity, lymph nodes were showed kidney shaped, oval or spindle shaped high signal intensity structures. The subjective scores for head and neck coil and coil images were (2.0 ± 0.9) and (1.5 ± 0.7) respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=-2.714, P=0.007), image quality of small coil group was better than that of head and neck coil group. The SIRN of the two groups was 1.7±0.8 and 2.1± 1.2 respectively, and the SIRD was 1.8±0.7 and 2.5±1.7 respectively, which showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (t value was 2.978, 2.427 respectively, P value was 0.006, 0.031 respectively).All facial nerve trunks could be displayed by head and neck coil and small coil. On head and neck coil images, 25 sides of temporofacial truck, 15 sides of cervicofacial truck, 17 sides of temporofacial branches, 11 sides of cervicofacial branches, 16 sides of the parotid duct could be displayed. On small coil images, 30 sides of temporofacial truck, 28 sides of cervicofacial truck, 26 sides of temporofacial branches, 23 sides of cervicofacial branches, 27 sides of the parotid duct could be displayed, which showed a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Conclusion Small surface coil performed better in parotid MR imaging with 3D-FISP-FS sequence than that of head and neck coil, which can simultaneous clearly display the trunk and branches of the intra-parotid facial nerves and parotid ducts.

SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE