Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 3 de 3
Filtre
Ajouter des filtres








Gamme d'année
1.
Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 26(3): 380-389, July-Sept. 2022. tab, graf
Article Dans Anglais | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1405132

Résumé

Abstract Introduction Prenatal exposure to the Zika virus can impair neurodevelopment and cause auditory damage. Objective To analyze the frequency-following response (FFR) and the auditory behavior (with the LittlEars® questionnaire) of children with and without prenatal exposure to Zika virus infection. Methods A total of 30 children participated in the present study, divided into 3 groups: 10 children with microcephaly and prenatal exposure to the Zika virus; 10 normocephalic children with prenatal exposure to the Zika virus; and 10 children with no evidence of prenatal exposure to the virus. The FFR test was performed with the /da/ syllable. The LittlEars® questionnaire was used with parents/guardians. Results For the FFR measurements, there was no difference between the groups. The children with exposure to the Zika virus presented a final score in the questionnaire below what is expected from children with normal hearing. A significant difference was observed for the final, semantic, and expressive scores between the group with microcephaly and the other groups. A strong negative correlation was seen between the LittlEars® questionnaire final score and the FFR measurements for the group with microcephaly when compared with the other groups. Conclusion Children exposed to the Zika virus, with and without microcephaly, presented FFR patterns similar to what was seen in children with no evidence of virus exposure. However, they showed signs of immature auditory behavior, suggesting auditory development delay.

2.
Chinese Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery ; (12): 225-229, 2016.
Article Dans Chinois | WPRIM | ID: wpr-493923

Résumé

[ABSTRACT]OBJECTIVETo investigate the relationships between electrophysiological characteristic of speech evoked auditory brainstem response and Mandarin phonetically balanced maximum, so as to provide more clues for the mechanism of speech cognitive behavior. METHODSThe speech discrimination scores were obtained by Mandarin phonemic-balanced monosyllable lists via speech audiometric software in forty-one ears of normal hearing adults. Their s-ABRs were recorded with speech syllables da with the intensity of phonetically balanced maximum (PBmax). The electrophysiological characteristic of s-ABR, as well as the relationships between PBmax and s-ABR parameters including latency in time domain, fundamental frequency (F0) and first formant (F1) in frequency domain were analyzed statistically.RESULTS While divided the subjects into three groups by PBmax1= 100%, 100%

3.
Clinics ; 66(2): 293-298, 2011. tab
Article Dans Anglais | LILACS | ID: lil-581517

Résumé

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether neurophysiological auditory brainstem responses to clicks and repeated speech stimuli differ between typically developing children and children with phonological disorders. INTRODUCTION: Phonological disorders are language impairments resulting from inadequate use of adult phonological language rules and are among the most common speech and language disorders in children (prevalence: 8 - 9 percent). Our hypothesis is that children with phonological disorders have basic differences in the way that their brains encode acoustic signals at brainstem level when compared to normal counterparts. METHODS: We recorded click and speech evoked auditory brainstem responses in 18 typically developing children (control group) and in 18 children who were clinically diagnosed with phonological disorders (research group). The age range of the children was from 7-11 years. RESULTS: The research group exhibited significantly longer latency responses to click stimuli (waves I, III and V) and speech stimuli (waves V and A) when compared to the control group. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that the abnormal encoding of speech sounds may be a biological marker of phonological disorders. However, these results cannot define the biological origins of phonological problems. We also observed that speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses had a higher specificity/sensitivity for identifying phonological disorders than click-evoked auditory brainstem responses. CONCLUSIONS: Early stages of the auditory pathway processing of an acoustic stimulus are not similar in typically developing children and those with phonological disorders. These findings suggest that there are brainstem auditory pathway abnormalities in children with phonological disorders.


Sujets)
Enfant , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Stimulation acoustique/méthodes , Voies auditives/physiologie , Potentiels évoqués auditifs du tronc cérébral/physiologie , Troubles de la parole/physiopathologie , Analyse de variance , Études cas-témoins , Électroencéphalographie , Études prospectives
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
Détails de la recherche