RÉSUMÉ
Objective To evaluate the implementation, application, problems, and suggestions associated with the WS 262-2017 Specification for Testing of Quality Control in γ-Ray Sources Afterloading Brachytherapy among radiation workers in Jiangsu Province, China, and to provide a scientific basis for further revision and implementation of this standard. Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted among employees of public and private institutions involved in radiation health technology services, radiation health supervision, and medical services in Jiangsu Province who carried out afterloading testing, supervision, and treatment. The survey primarily focused on the implementation status, technical content, and implementation effect of WS 262-2017, and the results were summarized and analyzed. Results A total of 185 valid questionnaires were collected, and 73.5% of the respondents were aware of the standard. Among the respondents who were aware of the standard, 29.4% did not participate in relevant training, and 41.2% did not use or infrequently used the standard. Moreover, 94.1% of survey respondents considered the standard to be scientifically robust and free of issues, 88.6% responded that the main technical content of the standard was highly operable, and 97.8% agreed that the main content of the standard was coordinated and consistent with relevant regulatory standards. In addition, 88.6%, 90.8%, and 87.0% of survey respondents reported that this standard provided significant assistance and played an important role in optimizing radiation protection, quality control and testing of radiation therapy equipment, and improving professional skills for technical personnel. Conclusion Radiation workers in Jiangsu Province have a high awareness rate of WS 262-2017 and believe that this standard is scientifically rigorous and plays an important role. There is no need for revision, but relevant departments should strengthen the promotion and training concerning the standard.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective To investigate the awareness of the Radiation Shielding Requirements for Radiotherapy Room–Part 2: Radiotherapy Room of Electron Linear Accelerators (GBZ/T 201.2—2011) among relevant practitioners in medical institutions as well as its implementation and application situation and collect relevant problems and suggestions for an evaluation of the scientificalness, standardization, and timeliness of the standard, and to provide a scientific basis for the further revision and implementation of the standard. Methods An online questionnaire survey was conducted among relevant employees in medical institutions providing medical linear accelerator radiotherapy across 22 provinces of China, which investigated the awareness, training, application, and revision suggestions related to GBZ/T 201.2—2011. The questionnaires were collected and analyzed. Results A total of 340 relevant practitioners filled out the questionnaire. Of the participants, 66.80% were physicists; 79.11% had an awareness of the standard; 56.18% ever participated in the standard-related training; but the survey results showed that the practitioners did not have a good knowledge of the standard’s content, and the training and promotion were not enough; 83.24% thought that the standard had been widely used; 17.60% thought that the standard needed to be revised; 76.76% thought that there was a need to add calculation examples; 88.82% thought that neutron shielding needed to be considered for the 10 MV X-ray accelerator room. Conclusion The standard has been widely known in the field of radiotherapy protection. With the development of radiotherapy technology, the standard should be revised to add calculation examples and consider neutron shielding in the 10 MV X-ray accelerator room. The standard is highly technical and difficult to grasp, so the promotion and implementation goals should be appropriate for different personnel groups, the training for employees at key posts should be strengthened, and the methods recommended in the standard should be uniformly used throughout the country.
RÉSUMÉ
The purpose of this study was to analyze the appraising frame and the accreditation system of universities in both Korea and the United Sates, as well as developing a standard plan to appraise 4 year nursing education institutions in Korea. Research design of this study was descriptive comparative research. The results of the research can be divided into six fields, educational purposes, educational courses, students, faculty, facility equipments and administration finance in Korea. Then the results were further categorized into seven fields : mission and governance, faculty, students, curriculum and instruction, resources, educational effectiveness and integrity. Thus Korean appraising frames were suggested to have eight fields of standard. The fields are philosophy and purposes of educational institution, educational courses and instruction, students, faculty, facility equipments, adminstration finance, educational effectiveness and integrity.